overseas recruitment practices in india
play

OVERSEAS RECRUITMENT PRACTICES IN INDIA Dr S Irudaya Rajan Dr V J - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

OVERSEAS RECRUITMENT PRACTICES IN INDIA Dr S Irudaya Rajan Dr V J Varghese Dr M S Jayakumar Research Unit on International Migration Centre For Development Studies (CDS), Thiruvananthapuram Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs (MOIA),


  1. OVERSEAS RECRUITMENT PRACTICES IN INDIA Dr S Irudaya Rajan Dr V J Varghese Dr M S Jayakumar Research Unit on International Migration Centre For Development Studies (CDS), Thiruvananthapuram Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs (MOIA), Government of India

  2. INTRODUCTION � India, one of the largest manpower- exporting countries – about 10 million or 1 percent of India’s population � It tops the list of recipient countries of migrant remittances with $ 27 billion in 2007 – 3 percent of GNP � Kerala State in India – 1.8 million � Remittances – 20% of the SDP

  3. OBJECTIVES • Understand the intricacies of overseas recruitment practices • Analyze the emigration process through various channels such as recruitment agencies and others • Provide policy recommendations to improve the recruitment system.

  4. STAKEHOLDERS • The study based on the survey done at the national level from intending migrants, recruitment agencies and Protectors of Emigrants in 8 locations which are hubs of the recruitment activities and the process of emigration clearance. • Foreign employers, Foreign recruitment agencies, Workers in the Workers Camps in Gulf, Indian Missions were interviewed without the structured questionnaire. • Special Survey among emigrant households and return migrants in the state of Kerala .

  5. Section 22 of the The Emigration Act 1983 • “No citizen of India shall emigrate unless he obtains under this chapter from the protector of emigrants authorization in the prescribed manner” • However, thirteen categories of persons have been exempted from this requirement (below 18 years, above 50 years, completed 10 years of schooling) • Emigration Check Not Required (ECNR) Passport holders – “Any” country • Emigration Check Required (ECR) passport holders – “Exempted” for ECNR countries • ECNR countries - 174 • ECR countries – 18 countries (Gulf, Malaysia, Jordan, Libya, Iraq is banned ) – Exemption Granted

  6. The Emigration Act 1983 on Overseas Recruitment • Registered Recruitment Agencies (RRA) • The Protector General of Emigrants • Three categories of RRA – 1835 as of 2007 • < 300 persons: Rs. 3 lakh • 301-1000 persons: Rs.5 lakhs • > 1000 persons: Rs. 10 lakhs • Service charges: Rs. 5000 (skilled worker, Rs. 3000 (semi-skilled workers), Rs. 2000 (unskilled workers and Rs 10000 (other than the above

  7. Workers Emigrated and Suspension Granted, 1985-2007 (in millions) 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 year Workers Emigrated Suspension granted

  8. Destination of Indian Emigrants, 1988-2007 (Percent) 120 100 80 million 60 40 20 0 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 year % to Gulf % to UAE % to SAUDI

  9. Emigrants by States in India, 1993-2007 (percent) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 year % of South India % of Kerala % of Tamil Nadu

  10. Location of POE offices and Trends in Migration, 2001-07 80 70 60 50 % of POE 40 30 20 10 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Year % of POE

  11. Emigrants in Gulf: India and Pakistan, 2002 4000000 3500000 3000000 2500000 2000000 1500000 1000000 500000 0 UAE Saudi Qatar Oman Kuwait Bahrain Total Arabia Countries India Pakistan

  12. Recognition of Weakness • Union Minister of Overseas Indian Affairs, Government of India and other officials connections with the Ministry • “ the system that the Government had put in place to regulate and streamline the emigration process itself has resulted in corruption and in the formation of a nexus between government officials and recruitment agencies leading to increasing exploitation of the poor”

  13. Findings from the Intended Migrants Survey • Channels of Migration: friends and relatives = 79%, foreign employer = 7.3, Government agency = 0.5; RA = 13.5 • Cost of Migration = about 1200 US $ • Sources of Finance: one-third from the money lenders • Awareness: Contract, working conditions and other information on Gulf (limited knowledge)

  14. Findings from the Emigrants Survey • Cost of Migration: 1200 US $ for friends and relatives and 2000 US $ for RAs • Channel and the sources of finance remains the same • Various payments of migration: Visa fee, recruitment charges, interviews (practical tests), medical test, insurance, emigration clearance and air faire • Salaries in Gulf: three out of 5 receives equal to 200 US $ and one of out of 10 above 500 US $

  15. Findings from the Return Emigrants Survey • Channel of Migration: Individual agents and travel agents – new channels • Problems faced in the Gulf: taking away passport, signing of new contract with low wages, modified work and living conditions and return airfare and other employment benefits such as overtime and leave salaries. • Reasons for return: one in three due to low remuneration and poor working conditions. • One groups being exploited and other groups come in (replacement by region or country)

  16. Findings from Recruitment Agencies • Not transparent • Buy visas from foreign employers and foreign recruitment agencies • Receive services charges from both foreign employers and emigrants • Closely work with individual agents • Closely work with protectors of emigrants

  17. Notes from Gulf • Non-payment of salaries • Salary levels are very low – 100 US $ • Foreign employers pay services charges to RA in India • Foreign employers just provide visas and ask them to send workers • Foreign employers ask money for visas from RA

  18. Notes from Gulf (collusion) • Between foreign recruitment agencies and Indian recruitment agencies • Between foreign employers and recruitment agencies • Between foreign employers and individual agents • Between return emigrants and foreign employers • “Ghost” companies and rampant free visa and visit visas.

  19. Required Policy Changes • POE offices have no credible mechanisms except the attestation by the Indian Embassy – Should be reviewed • MEA – Passport Control and Indian Embassy; MHA: Bureau of Emigration, MOIA: POE – Need more coordination • MOIA should establish its own offices to handle the labor issues in the countries of destination

  20. Required Policy Changes • Removal of ECR passports • Compulsory Pre-departure Training • Negotiation of Minimum wages in Gulf • Introduce a new system in which RA receive service charges only from the foreign employer (no money from intended emigrants)- Zero cost of migration • Increase in the Registration fee for RA • Collaboration of sending countries

Recommend


More recommend