key strengths of star af ii
play

Key Strengths of STAR AF II Exclusively persistent AF (80% in - PDF document

8/16/2016 Disclosures Moderate Support (research) Biosense Webster Is Durable PVI Enough for Ablation of Persistent AF? Bayer Inc CHRS 2016, San Francisco Boehringer Ingelheim Medtronic Inc Advisory Board, Speakers fees


  1. 8/16/2016 Disclosures • Moderate Support (research) • Biosense Webster Is Durable PVI Enough for Ablation of Persistent AF? • Bayer Inc CHRS 2016, San Francisco • Boehringer Ingelheim • Medtronic Inc • Advisory Board, Speakers fees Atul Verma, MD FRCPC FHRS • Bayer Inc Director, Heart Rhythm Program • Biosense Webster Southlake Regional Health Centre • Boehringer Ingelheim Newmarket, Ontario, Canada Chair, Heart Rhythm Working Group, Cardiovascular Care Network • Medtronic Inc Associate Professor, University of Toronto • St Jude Medical Inc Adjunct Professor, McGill University Key Strengths of STAR AF II • Exclusively persistent AF (80% in continuous AF > 6 months) • Large clinical study (589 patients in 48 centers) • Rigorous follow ‐ up (18 months, Holters, at least weekly TTM for entire 18 months) • Arms chosen based on most common techniques of ablation for persistent AF: PVI, PVI+CFE, and PVI+LINES (1) 1 Calkins et al, Consensus Guidelines Catheter Ablation, Heart Rhythm 2012 1

  2. 8/16/2016 Purpose Methods – Ablation Strategy ** Complete elimination of CFE • To compare the efficacy of three different AF ablation (not defragmentation) until termination strategies in patients with persistent AF*: or all CFE regions eliminated. (1) Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone CFE strategy (2) PVI plus complex fractionated electrograms (PVI+CFE) (3) PVI plus linear ablation (PVI+Lines). Linear strategy ** Pre ‐ specified pacing manoeuvres to determine linear block * Defined as AF episode lasting > 7 days but less than 3 years Results ‐ Ablation characteristics Results ‐ Primary Outcome Documented AF > 30 seconds after one procedure with or without AAD • 79% of patients presented to EP lab in spontaneous AF p=0.15 • Successful PV isolation obtained in 97% of all patients (all groups) • CFE were eliminated in 80% of patients 59% – 11% not ablated because AF non ‐ inducible after PVI 48% – 9% all CFE could not be eliminated 44% • Both lines with block achieved in 74% of patients – Roof line only 93% – Mitral line only 75% 2

  3. 8/16/2016 Percentage of Patients with PV AF Burden Reduction Recovery at Repeat Procedure 100 86 84 83 Patients with >1 recovered PV (%) 90 77 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 PVI PVI+CFE PVI+Lines Total Burden calculation based on maximum of burden calculated from all follow ‐ up Holters or # of weeks with at least one TTM of AF or number of days in AF from CRF * 80% of PVI+Lines pts also had gap in one or more lines, 63% of PVI+CFE had more CFE to ablate Freedom from AF/AT after 1 procedure Freedom from AF/AT after 1 procedure based on linear block achieved based on all CFE ablated 3

  4. 8/16/2016 13 14 CHASE AF Trial – Volger et al, JACC 2015 CHASE AF Trial • Randomized comparison of full stepwise approach (PVI+CFE+LINES) vs PVI alone + cardioversion for patients with persistent AF • All patients received PVI first – any patient terminating after PVI alone was excluded • The stepwise patients received: • 100% got LA defragmentation • 81% got CS defragmentation • 91% got RA defragmentation • 36% got linear ablation for AT 15 16 CHASE AF - Results Meta-Analysis – PVI or PVI+ for PeAF Scott et al, Europace 2016 ** Still no difference when multiple procedures taken into account 4

  5. 8/16/2016 17 18 Meta-Analysis – PVI+CFAE vs PVI Meta-Analysis – PVI+LALA vs PVI 19 20 Cryoballoon for Persistent AF Cryoballoon for Persistent AF • 100 patients undergoing ablation with Artic Front Advance balloon Over mean follow-up of technology with 11 +/- 6 months, persistent AF 67% of patients were in sinus rhythm • Follow-up at 1,3,6, and 12 months • 7 day Holter at 3 and 6 months and 24 hour Holter at 12 months Koektuerk et al, Circ EP 2015 5

  6. 8/16/2016 21 Does this prove that PVI is enough for persistent Cryoballoon for Persistent AF AF? • 393 patients undergoing • NO. ablation with Artic Front • Success rates are still low – about 60% in all of these Advance balloon studies technology • Many of these patients required more than one procedure • Only 62 (16%) had • We can and should be able to do better persistent AF • Better patient selection? • Success in 61.3% • Need to identify novel targets for ablation more effective • Persistent AF was one of than CFAE or linear ablation three multivariable predictors of recurrence Irfan et al, Europace 2015 24 AcQMap™ High Resolution Imaging and AcQMap of Pre-PVI AF Mapping System 48 LSPV Engineered • Pre-PVI map showed an even LSPV • Ultrasound anatomy reconstruction electrodes mix of focal breakthrough and RSPV RSPV LAA • Up to 115,000 points collected per LAA confined zones of irregular- LIPV minute 48 rotational conduction anterior RIPV Ultrasound • 3D surface is algorithmically transducers to the right PV antrum and reconstructed from ultrasound point between the inferior aspect of set MV right and left PV antrums. • Dipole density mapping LSPV LSPV LSPV RSPV RSPV LAA LAA RSPV LAA • Intracardiac unipolar voltage sampled • “Irregular rotational” refers at 150,000/sec LIPV LIPV LIPV to multidirectional spiral • Forward and inverse algorithms RIPV RIPV RIPV conduction around a applied to derive dipole density confined zone. • Multiple map types to view and assess activation patterns Identify and locate Image guided ablation arrhythmic mechanisms strategy Brief Summary: Please review the Instructions for Use prior to using these devices for a complete listing of indications, contraindications, AcQMap is not for sale in the United States warnings, precautions, potential adverse events and directions for use. 6

  7. 8/16/2016 26 NOVEL ALGORITHM OF DOMINANT FREQUENCY & ELECTROGRAM PATTERNS TO IDENTIFY FOCAL SOURCES AND ROTATIONAL PATTERNS DURING HUMAN PERSISTENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION TOUCH AF Trial – Verma et al, pending AtulVerma, MD, FHRS, Thomas Deneke, MD, PhD, Yariv A. Amos, Msc, Roy Urman, BSc, Philipp Halbfass, MD, Karin M. Netwich, MD, Erik Wissner, MD, FHRS, Karl- Heinz Kuck, MD, FHRS and Roland, TilzMD. SOUTHLAKE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada; HEART CENTER BAD NEUSTADT, Bad Neustadt, Germany; BIOSENSE WEBSTER , Haifa, Israel; ASKLEPIOS KLINIK ST. GEORG , Hamburg, Germany ABSTRACT RESULTS Focal Source Number of focal sources found • Contact force sensing for ablation of persistent AF in analysis of 121 maps Automated methods may identify areas of The CARTOFINDER™ system identified • Allowed wide antral PVI and roof line only interest during ablation of persistent atrial 34±14% of the basket EGMs were adequate fibrillation (AF). We sought to determine if an for analysis when positioned in the left atrium algorithm based on dominant frequency (DF) (LA) and 60±15% were adequate in the right and electrogram (EGM) patterns during atrium (RA). • Randomized operators to CF-guided vs CF-blinded persistent AF could be used to identify focal 20 patients were analyzed, rotational sources and rotational patterns . activations were identified by the experts in approach 27/70 (39%) of the LA maps and 24/51 (47%) of the RA maps. Focal sources were identified in 47/70 (67%) of the LA maps and METHODS 46/51 (90%) of the RA maps. Number of rotational activation wave front found • Final analysis not yet complete, BUT….. in analysis of 121 maps . Maps of persistent AF were acquired using a multi-electrode basket catheter. The CARTOFINDER™ Algorithm sensitivity and specificity CARTOFINDER™ algorithm filters all Rotational Activation Pattern with respect to human expert identification unipolar EGMs for quality, reduces far-field Foci Sensitivity/Specificity 89% / 77% ventricular artifacts and annotates the timing RAP Sensitivity / of the activation wave front. DF analysis was • Average contact force was 15 grams for both arms 82% / 70% Specificity performed and the pattern was classified as homogenous (<0.5 Hz) or heterogeneous Rotational activations covered 67±8% of the local CL with a mean of 3.0±2.7 rotations. (>0.5 Hz) & stable (regular/no variation over • Overall success rate was 78% with fewer than 20% of CONCLUSIONS 30 sec) or unstable (random variation). The Rotational wave front patterns were related algorithm can identify QS EGM patterns and to areas of homogeneous-stable DF “regular” sequential atrial activation spatiotemporal stability (variance 0.46± patients requiring second procedure A CARTOFINDER™ algorithm based on gradients occupying >50% of the cycle 0.17Hz) and with sequential EGM activation DF, LAT and EGM patterns correlated well gradients . Focal sources were related to length (CL) suggesting rotational wave with visually confirmed regions of interest fronts. All 4D activation maps were reviewed areas of heterogeneous-stable DF during human persistent AF. These spatiotemporal stability (variance by two blinded independent adjudicators to patterns could prospectively identify visually identify focal sources and rotational 0.58±0.30Hz) and with a consistent QS EGM regions of interest with a reasonably high pattern. DF temporal stability between RAPs wave fronts & only those agreed upon by predictive value. both reviewers were included for analysis. and sources was statistically significantly different (unpaired t test, p<0.000001) Conclusions • PVI seems to be the cornerstone for any ablation procedure for persistent AF • Success rates with PVI alone seem to be stuck around 60% • Many will require more than one procedure • Mapping AF may help us to realize novel targets for ablation and improve success rates 7

Recommend


More recommend