3 rd community meeting
play

3 rd Community Meeting March 26, 2015 Provi viding ding Feedb - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Riversid ide e Drive e Complete Streets Project 3 rd Community Meeting March 26, 2015 Provi viding ding Feedb dbac ack Sign-In with contact information for future updates Complete questionnaire provided tonight Complete


  1. Riversid ide e Drive e Complete Streets Project 3 rd Community Meeting March 26, 2015

  2. Provi viding ding Feedb dbac ack • Sign-In with contact information for future updates • Complete questionnaire provided tonight • Complete comment card to request time to speak or ask a question following the presentation

  3. Purpose ose of the Proj ojec ect • Improve safety and accessibility for residents traveling by bicycle or by foot to reach the riverfront and its attractions.

  4. Reason asons for the Pilot t Proj oject • Assess feasibility of alternative roadway configuration • Measure impacts to automobile traffic flows • Consider design alternatives presented by public feedback and comments

  5. Eva valuatin luating the Pilo lot t Proj ojec ect • Maintain the same roadway configuration as Memphis In May for 12-18 months • Traffic data analysis designed to inform on the feasibility • Public comments and feedback used to refine design options and address concerns not evident in traffic data

  6. DATA COL OLLECTIO CTION & A ANALYSIS IS

  7. Summ mmar ary of Traffic fic Data ta • Traffic volumes along Riverside Drive remain constant during the pilot phase. No significant shifting of traffic volumes to parallel streets in downtown • Traffic speeds reduced slightly compared to measures before pilot implementation, but remain well above the posted speed limit • Recorded crash incidents are higher during the pilot phase than in previous periods of time

  8. Traf affic ic Volum lumes es Riverside: Between Georgia & Beale Year Measured 13,356 2013 AADT 14,010 Fall 2014 13,166 Winter 2015 SOURCE: CITY OF MEMPHIS DIVISION OF ENGINEERING, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INTERSECTION & RADAR COUNTS

  9. Traf affic ic Speeds eds Vehicle Speed (85th%) YEAR REGULATORY MEASURED 2006 40mph 47mph June 2014 (Pilot) 35mph 44mph Sept 2014 (Pilot) 35mph 38mph Jan 2015 (Pilot) 35mph 44mph SOURCE: CITY OF MEMPHIS DIVISION OF ENGINEERING, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INTERSECTION & RADAR COUNTS

  10. Crash ash Inciden dents ts REPOR ORTED CRASH ASH HISTOR ORY QTY. 2013 13 2014 2015 15 JAN 1 1 8 FEB 1 2 0 MAR 0 2 3 APR 2 2 MAY 2 0 JUNE 1 6 JULY 2 1 AUG 2 0 SEPT 1 3 OCT 2 3 NOV 2 1 DEC 2 4 TOTAL 18 18 25 25 SOURCE: MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT (MPD), Crash Reports 2013-2015

  11. SHAPIN ING G DE DESIGN GN THROUGH OUGH PUBLIC LIC FEEDB DBACK

  12. Design ign Optio ions s Consider sidered ed “Go back to the recommendation of Mr. Speck!” “This is a fabulous pilot project.” “A better idea is to create a dedicated bike “One bike lane on each side is the only alternative that makes any sense.” path in the park.”

  13. On PARK RKING ING “Southerners hate parallel parking.” • Multiple recommendations received on the best way to handle accessibility of parking “I urge you not to remove the existing near Tom Lee Park and Beale Street Landing parking lots associated with Tom Lee Park and Beale Street Landing.” • There were some supporters of Mr. Speck’s recommendation that all surface parking lots “The parking lot at Tom Lee Park is should be closed and moved to on-street used extensively. Any alternative parallel parking eliminating this parking lot would be a death blow to these park users! • Many more comments were received, however, that emphasized the high level of “Any scenario that closes the parking current use at these parking lots, and the difficulty in function and design that on- lot, or reduces it's size, would surely street parking would pose along Riverside make the Park less accessible to the Drive citizens of Memphis.” • Final design considerations do not propose the “I support reducing surface parking in closure of parking lots at Tom Lee Park or Tom Lee Park and Beale Street Beale St. Landing Landing.”

  14. On THE MEDIA IAN “Traffic is too fast with no median to • Concerns were raised about the perceived divide traffic…Re -divide north/south danger of two-way traffic existing solely on the east side of the existing landscaped traffic.” median “One bike lane on each side is the only alternative that makes any sense.” • Multiple recommendations were received about how to situate the traffic lanes and “When leaving my River Tower bike lanes around the median that would best serve all roadway users residence, it is difficult to see south bound traffic. When the street was • The current division of automobile traffic on divided you could clearly see the south one side of the median and bicycle & and north bound.” pedestrian traffic on the other side were most popular with those that indicated they “Keep [bike lanes] on the west side of were using the new bike/ped lanes Riverside.” • Final design considerations return automobile “The fact that [the bike lanes] are traffic divided between the landscaped separated by a median enhances median safety and is a wonderful idea.”

  15. On CONG NGES ESTIO TION N & CRA RASHES HES “I believe adding designated left turn • Feedback indicated that congestion did lanes at intersections would benefit become a concern during certain periods of the day or as a result of specific greatly…” circumstance “…long delays waiting for cars to turn • Turning vehicles (into Tom Lee Park) or at into the Tom Lee parking lot...” any of the cross streets (Beale, Georgia, Carolina) all experienced backups during “…cruisers tying up the only through heavy peak periods of automobile travel lane… • Crashes that occurred between Beale and “Turning into park cause full traffic Georgia left no room for automobiles to stop. Wrecks cause full traffic stop. move around the crash site and proceed ahead. This situation causes congestion until “…there is no where for cars to go emergency responders can make the scene around a wreck .” and remove the barriers to travel • Final design considerations will address the addition of turn lanes at key intersections and provide clear access in case of crash

  16. On PEDES ESTR TRIAN IAN ACCES CESS “…the lack of use by pedestrians is • Concerns were raised about the difficulty of extremely low even on weekends.” crossing Riverside Drive as a pedestrian due to relocating automobile traffic to east side “No one uses the pedestrian lane. You of landscaped median can go out on any given day and find • people running/walking/biking on the Even though the crossing distance was half of its original configuration, pedestrians sidewalk through the park. People noted that the frequency of automobiles left choose to use that instead.” little time for breaks in traffic, resulting in increased time waiting to cross “I think it is a really good idea to give pedestrians a chance to pause • Few pedestrians used the designated between the lanes…it would make me pedestrian lane finding the park trails more less nervous to have to try to gauge attractive and preferred for use both directions at the same time to cross with my two dogs. • Final design considerations return automobile traffic divided between the landscaped median and do not contain any designated pedestrian space within the roadway width

  17. On BEALE LE STREET REET “…recommend a turn signal to be • Transition to the pilot configuration at the installed for south bound traffic Beale Street intersection was a cause of concern for all roadway users turning [east] onto Beale Street .” “Need a crosswalk at Beale Street like • Crash incidents at this intersection increased during the pilot phase as drivers sought to the one on the south end of Riverside .” jockey for position within the transition area “I would like to see the bike lane • Despite its origin as a pilot configuration, extended to the Welcome Center.” many users urged for future improvements that would enhance its connectivity and access for bicycle and pedestrian use • Final design considerations will include continuation of all lanes and access north to Jefferson Ave/Bass Pro Drive.

  18. On I-55, On , CARO ROLIN LINA, , & GEOR ORGIA IA “…turning left from Georgia and • Concerns related to turning vehicles, Carolina onto 55 is a nightmare during pedestrian crossings, and traffic speeds at this intersection existed prior to the pilot rush hour .” configuration “..motorists coming off the interstate • Multiple users provided feedback related to with traffic immediately narrowing to the continuation of these problems under one lane (thus backing up traffic on the pilot despite increased measures to the interstate during busy times )…” bring visibility to the I-55 transition area “Access to I -55 from Georgia or • Under the current conditions, there are not Carolina are nearly impossible due to enough vehicles to warrant a traffic signal, the traffic change .” but the conditions will continue to change as TDOT begins work on the Crump/I-55 “I believe there should be some interchange. solution for traffic coming off 55 • Final design considerations will seek to entering residential traffic at minimize the negative impacts to travel at Georgia..” these intersections while TDOT’s Crump/I -55 interchange project in constructed

Recommend


More recommend