hugues mailleux
play

Hugues Mailleux Medical Physics Department Institut Paoli-Calmettes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hugues Mailleux Medical Physics Department Institut Paoli-Calmettes Marseille France Sunday 17 July 2016 AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. Material 3. Optimization process 4. Results 5. Comments 6. Conclusion 7. Thanks INTRODUCTION o


  1. Hugues Mailleux Medical Physics Department Institut Paoli-Calmettes Marseille France Sunday 17 July 2016

  2. AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. Material 3. Optimization process 4. Results 5. Comments 6. Conclusion 7. Thanks

  3. INTRODUCTION o Plan Competition: opportunity to evaluate our current treatment technique for left sided breast  VMAT with 2 partial arcs  First patient treated in september 2014

  4. TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM o RayStation (RaySearch) r.5.0  Dose calculation for photon beams • Collapsed cone convolution superposition algorithm • GPU: Fluence + Convolution  Plan Optimization • Standard inverse planning • Clinical goals

  5. TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM o Clinical goals

  6. ACCELERATOR o Versa HD (Elekta)  Standard 6 MV  MLC Agility

  7. OPTIMIZATION PROCESS 1. Beam geometry

  8. ISOCENTER POSITION o Not guided by dosimetric considerations but by technical constraints: Constraint n ° 1: CBCT o  The isocenter must be placed to avoid collisions

  9. ISOCENTER POSITION o Constraint n ° 2: CBCT  The isocenter must be placed to get the entire breast inside the field of view

  10. ISOCENTER POSITION o Constraint n ° 3: Jaws and MLC maximum opening  The isocenter must be placed to cover the entire PTV

  11. BEAM GEOMETRY o No couch rotation o Gantry  Arc 1: 170 ° → ~ 300 °  Arc 2: ~ 300 ° → 170 ° o Collimator :  Arc 1: 5 °  Arc 2: 355 ° o Grid size:  Plan Competition: 1,5 mm  Current practice: 3 mm o Gantry spacing between 2 CP: 4 °

  12. OPTIMIZATION PROCESS 1. Beam geometry 2. Create additional structures

  13. ADDITIONAL OPTIMIZATION STRUCTURES

  14. ADDITIONAL OPTIMIZATION STRUCTURES

  15. ADDITIONAL OPTIMIZATION STRUCTURES

  16. OPTIMIZATION PROCESS 1. Beam geometry 2. Create additional structures 3. Initial objectives

  17. OPTIMIZATION PROCESS o Initial objectives

  18. OPTIMIZATION PROCESS o Initial objectives

  19. OPTIMIZATION PROCESS 1. Beam geometry 2. Create additional structures 3. Initial objectives PTV criteria OK ?

  20. INITIAL OBJECTIVES o Uniform dose and prescription  Usually: 50 Gy to median dose (ICRU 84)  in this case: 51,5 Gy to median dose

  21. INITIAL OBJECTIVES

  22. OPTIMIZATION PROCESS 1. Beam geometry 2. Create additional structures 3. Initial objectives PTV criteria OK ? 4. Add OAR objectives (weight = 1)

  23. OAR CRITERIA o 2 types of criteria for OAR:  maximum dose • Rigth breast • Spinal cord  Parallel organs • Heart • Left lung • Rigth lung

  24. MAXIMUM DOSE CRITERIA o Maximum dose: o Rigth breast o Spinal cord

  25. MAXIMUM DOSE : OAR OBJECTIVES o Additonal structures  Breast rigth + 2 mm  Spinal cord + 2 mm

  26. PARALLEL OAR CRITERIA o Parallel OAR o Heart o Left Lung

  27. PARALLEL OAR CRITERIA o Parallel type OAR dosimetric criteria o Rigth Lung:

  28. PARALLEL OAR OBJECTIVES o Only one objectif by OAR o Initial weight: 1

  29. OPTIMIZATION PROCESS 3. Initial objectives (PTV, ring) 4. Add OAR objectives (weight = 1) 5. Fine-tune parallel OAR objectives 6. increase the weight of the OAR objectives clinical goals OK ? End

  30. HOW TO PUT THE MAXIMUM DOSE INSIDE DE CTV-LUMPECTOMY o Additional structure:  PTV – (CTV-LUMPECTOMY)  Add objectives:

  31. RESULTS

  32. RESULTS Better !

  33. DELIVERY TIME o Delivery time:  Arc 1: 1’13”  Arc 2: 1’18”

  34. PATIENT-SPECIFIC QA

  35. PATIENT-SPECIFIC QA

  36. COMMENTS: INTERFRACTION MOVEMENT

  37. COMMENTS: INTERFRACTION MOVEMENT o How to take this into account ?  For fixed fields: skin flash  VMAT ?

  38. COMMENTS: INTERFRACTION MOVEMENT o Virtual bolus

  39. COMMENTS: INTERFRACTION MOVEMENT o Optimization: 2 step process 1) With virtual bolus: Optimization on the PTV OUTSIDE 2) After having removed the virtual bolus: Optimization on the PTV without modifying the shape of the segments

  40. COMMENTS: INTERFRACTION MOVEMENT

  41. COMMENTS o In our current technique, we use additional objectives for:  Larynx  Thyroid  esophagus

  42. CONCLUSION o Some (humble) recommendations:  Well-defined methodology • learning curve • homogeneity of practices  As simple as possible: • 2 arcs • No couch rotation • As few objectives as possible for optimization  Use of Virtual bolus

  43. THANKS  Ahmad Nobah  Radiation Oncologists  Medical Physics team  RaySearch  My Family

Recommend


More recommend