bergman kernels on punctured riemann surfaces hugues
play

Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces Hugues Auvray joint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces Hugues Auvray joint work with X. Ma and G. Marinescu December 16, 2019 2019 Taipei Conference on Complex Geometry Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 1 / 17


  1. Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces Hugues Auvray — joint work with X. Ma and G. Marinescu — December 16, 2019 2019 Taipei Conference on Complex Geometry Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 1 / 17

  2. Content Bergman kernels on complete manifolds 1 Landscape General results Punctured Riemann surfaces 2 Setting Application of Theorem 0 Results Proofs 3 Corollary 4 Theorem 1 Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 2 / 17

  3. I-Bergman kernels on complete manifolds a) Landscape ◮ Start with an hermitian holomorphic line bundle ( L , h ) over a complete ahler manifold ( X n , ω X ) K¨ ( h might not polarize ω X ). ◮ Consider, for p ≥ 1 , the Hilbert space L p σ ∈ L 2 ( X , L p ) � ∂ H 0 (2) ( X , L p ) = � � � σ = 0 (here and below, L p is a shortcut for ( L ⊗ p , h p ) ). It might be of infinite dimension when X is non-compact. ◮ To these data, associate the Bergman kernels ( y ) ∗ ∈ L p s ( p ) ( x ) ⊗ s ( p ) � x ⊗ ( L p y ) ∗ B p : ( x , y ) �− → ℓ ℓ ℓ ≥ 0 for some (any) orthonormal basis ( s ( p ) ) ℓ ≥ 0 of H 0 (2) ( X , L p ) . More particularly, ℓ ℓ ≥ 0 | s ( p ) ( x ) | 2 look at the density functions B p ( x ) = B p ( x , x ) = � h p ≥ 0 . ℓ | σ ( x ) | 2 h p ◮ Alternatively: B p ( x ) = sup . � σ � 2 σ ∈ H 0 (2) , p ,σ � =0 L 2 Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 3 / 17

  4. I-Bergman kernels on complete manifolds b) B p asymptotics: general results Theorem 0 (Ma-Marinescu, 2007) With previous notations, assume that: i) (” uniform ampleness” ) there exists ε > 0 such that: iR h = loc − i ∂∂ log( | σ | 2 h ) ≥ εω X on X ; ii) (” bounded geometry” ) Ric( ω X ) ≥ − C ω X on X , for some C ≥ 0 . Then: for all j ≥ 0 , there exists b j ∈ C ∞ ( X ) such that: ∀ K ⋐ X , ∀ k , m ≥ 0 , ∃ Q = Q ( K , k , m , ε, C , n ) , ∀ p ≥ 1 , k � b j p − j � � p − n B p ( x ) − � C m ( K ) ≤ Qp − k − 1 . � � � j =0 More precisely, b 0 = ω n 2 π R h ) and i X (with ω h = h ω n b 1 = b 0 � � scal( ω h ) − 2∆ ω h log b 0 . 8 π Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 4 / 17

  5. I-b) B p asymptotics: general results A few remarks: ⊲ Long history; many names associated to this result: Tian (1990, k = 0 , m = 2 ), Bouche (1990), Catlin-Zelditch (1999-98, compact X ), ... ⊲ Quantization of Kodaira embedding theorem / scalar curvature in K¨ ahler geometry. ⊲ The proof requires two steps: 1- localization on B p ; 2- computations of the asymptotics with geometric data brought to C n (scaling techniques). ⊲ This statement does not say what happens to the Bergman density functions on neighbourhoods of infinity... Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 5 / 17

  6. II-Punctured Riemann surfaces a) Setting ” The most elementary class of complete non-compact K¨ ahler manifolds.” ◮ Take: • Σ = ¯ Σ � D , where D = { a 1 , . . . , a N } is the puncture divisor inside a compact Riemann surface ¯ Σ , and ω Σ a smooth K¨ ahler form on Σ ; • an hermitian line bundle ( L | Σ , h ) , with L holomorphic on ¯ Σ . ◮ Suppose moreover that there are trivializations ∼ − − → C z j × D r L | V j ( 0 < r < 1 ) around the a j ’s, such that: ( α ) | 1 | 2 � � log( | z j | 2 ) � h ( z j ) = � ; ( β ) i ( R h ) | j = ω Σ | j . V ∗ V ∗ In particular, ω Σ = ω D ∗ ( z j ) on V ∗ j , idz ∧ d ¯ z e metric on D ∗ ). where ω D ∗ = | z | 2 log 2 ( | z | 2 ) (Poincar´ Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 6 / 17

  7. II-a) Setting An arithmetic class of examples. — These (notably, properties ( α ) and ( β ) ) are natural hypotheses, as revealed by the following class of examples. If Γ ⊂ Psl(2 , R ) is a Fuchsian group of the first kind, which is geometrically finite and contains no elliptic element, then Σ = Γ \ H can be compactified by adjunction of finitely many points. Conversely, if Σ = ¯ Σ � { a 1 , . . . , a N } is such that (equivalently): • ˜ Σ = H , • 2 g ¯ Σ − 2 + N > 0 , • Σ admits a K¨ ahler-Einstein metric with negative scalar curvature, or • K ¯ Σ [ D ] ( D = { a 1 , . . . , a N } ) is ample, then: Γ = π 1 (Σ) is Fuchsian, first kind, geometrically finite, with no elliptic element. Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 7 / 17

  8. II-a) Setting An arithmetic class of examples. — Easy case: the principal congruence subgroup of level 2 Γ = ¯ Γ(2) = ker { Psl(2 , Z ) → Sl(2 , Z / 2 Z ) } ; Γ(2) \ H = P 1 � { 0 , 1 , ∞} . then as Riemann surfaces, ¯ In this context, K ¯ Σ [ D ] is ample, and (the formal square root) of ( K ¯ Σ [ D ] | Σ , π ∗ ω H ⊗ h D ) verifies ( α ) and ( β ) — here, ω H descends to Σ , and h D is defined on Σ by: | σ D | 2 h D ≡ 1 for some σ D ∈ O ([ D ]) such that D = { σ D = 0 } . Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 8 / 17

  9. II-Punctured Riemann surfaces b) Application of Theorem 0 Assume (Σ , ω Σ , L , h ) verify ( α ) and ( β ) ; then, for p ≥ 2 , H 0 Σ , L p → H 0 � ¯ Σ , L p � � � ֒ , (2) | Σ and more precisely, by Skoda’s theorem: H 0 Σ , L p σ ∈ H 0 � ¯ � σ ( a j ) = 0 , j = 0 , . . . , N � � � Σ , L p � � � ≃ ; (2) | Σ (2) (Σ , L p in particular, H 0 | Σ ) is of finite dimension, denoted by d p . Thus: p ( x ) = � d p j =1 | σ ( p ) 1- as B Σ ( x ) | 2 h p , for any fixed p , j B Σ p ( x ) → 0 as x → D ; 2- whereas for all m ≥ 1 and all compact subsets K of Σ , � 2 π � � p B Σ p ( x ) − 1 C m ( K ) → 0 as p → ∞ � � � by Theorem 0. What happens in the transition region? How to describe it? Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 9 / 17

  10. II-Punctured Riemann surfaces c) Results First, two localization results (comparison with the model D ∗ ): Theorem 1 For any m ≥ 0 , ℓ ≥ 0 and δ > 0 , there exists Q = Q ( m , ℓ, δ ) such that for all p ≫ 1 , � δ � p ( z ) − B D ∗ ∀ z ∈ V ∗ 1 ∪ . . . ∪ V ∗ � � log( | z | 2 ) � � B Σ � C m ( ω Σ ) ≤ Qp − ℓ , N , p ( z ) � where B D ∗ � D ∗ , ω D ∗ , C , � log( | z | 2 ) � � � is computed from the data � | · | . p Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 10 / 17

  11. And more recently: Theorem 2 The quotient B Σ p / B D ∗ can be extended smoothly through the origin, and, for any p m ≥ 0 and ℓ ≥ 0 , there exists Q = Q ( m ) such that for all p ≫ 1 , � B Σ � �� p � ≤ Qp − ℓ � � � D 1 · · · D m − 1 � � B D ∗ p ∂ ∂ where each D j represents ∂ z or z . ∂ ¯ Which tranlstes geometrically as: Theorem 3 Fix a neighbourhood of coordinate z around a puncture of Σ such that conditions ( α ) and ( β ) are verified. Then the difference of the pull-backs of the Fubini-Study metrics by the embeddings respectively induced by orthonormal bases of (2) (Σ , L p | Σ ) and H 0 , p H 0 (2) ( D ∗ ) can be written as η p idz ∧ dz , with: D 1 · · · D m η p = O ( p −∞ ) for all m ≥ 0 . Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 11 / 17

  12. II-c) Results Then, from Theorems 0, 1, and an explicit computation on the model D ∗ , one can, among others, estimate precisely the distorsion factor : Corollary 4 For p ≫ 1 , � p | σ ( x ) | 2 � 3 / 2 h p sup = sup B p ( x ) = + O ( p ) . � σ � 2 2 π x ∈ Σ , σ ∈ H 0 x ∈ Σ (2) , p � { 0 } L 2 In the arithmetic situation evoked above, for non-cocompact Γ , this translates as: (2Im z ) 2 p | f ( z ) | 2 � p � 3 / 2 sup = + O ( p ) , � f � 2 π z ∈ H , f ∈S Γ 2 p � { 0 } Pet where S Γ 2 p is the space of cusp modular forms (Spitzenformen) of weight 2 p . Remarks: ⊲ If Γ were cocompact, the sup above would be p π + O (1) . ⊲ In the line of results by Abbes-Ullmo, Michel-Ullmo, Friedman-Jorgenson-Kramer. ⊲ Version with Γ admitting elliptic elements. Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 12 / 17

  13. III-Proofs a) Corollary 4 By Theorems 0 and 1, enough to establish the same result for B D ∗ (close to p 0 ∈ D ). Observe that { z ℓ } ℓ ≥ 1 is a complete orthogonal family of � p | · | H 0 D ∗ , ω D ∗ , C , � � log( | z | 2 ) � � � ; direct computations then lead to: (2) � p ∞ � � log( | z | 2 ) � B D ∗ � ℓ p − 1 | z | 2 ℓ . p ( z ) = 2 π ( p − 1)! ℓ =1 This is explicit enough to: i) confirm the convergence given by Theorem 0, even near ∂ D , and with exponential rate; e.g. on annuli { a ≤ | z | < 1 } ( a ∈ (0 , 1) ), p ( x ) − p − 1 � � � B Σ C m ( { a ≤| z | < 1 } ) = O ( e − cp ) for some c = c ( a ) > 0; � � 2 π � up to 0 : setting x = | z | 2 / p and f p ( x ) = B D ∗ ii) analyze B D ∗ p +1 ( z ) , one gets: p ∞ � 2 π � 3 / 2 [ Gaussian functions centered at e − 1 /ℓ , of height 1 � f p = ℓ ] . p ℓ =1 Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 13 / 17

  14. III-a) Corollary 4 ii) � 2 π � 3 / 2 f p on (0 , 1) The scaled functions p � p � 3 / 2 + O ( p ) , and this sup is reached near From this, we infer sup [0 , 1] f p = 2 π x = e − 1 (which corresponds to | z | = e − p / 2 ). Hugues Auvray Bergman kernels on punctured Riemann surfaces 14 / 17

Recommend


More recommend