hrtpo strategic campaign and vision plan for passenger
play

HRTPO Strategic Campaign and Vision Plan for Passenger Rail July - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation To HRTPO Board Meeting Agenda Item #13 HRTPO Strategic Campaign and Vision Plan for Passenger Rail July 21, 2010 Presentation By Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. Vision Plan Phase 1: Study Objectives 1.


  1. Presentation To HRTPO Board Meeting Agenda Item #13 HRTPO Strategic Campaign and Vision Plan for Passenger Rail July 21, 2010 Presentation By Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc.

  2. Vision Plan Phase 1: Study Objectives 1. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization – Resolution 2009-05 The Hampton Roads TPO endorses –  Designation of a “High - Speed Rail” corridor along the NS/Route 460 corridor.  Enhancement of the Intercity Passenger Rail service along the CSXT/I-64 corridor. 2. USDOT FRA Public/Private Partnership Potential –  POSITIVE OPERATING RATIO  POSITIVE COST BENEFIT RATIO 1 TEMS, Inc.

  3. How Important is our Corridor?  Washington-Richmond-Hampton Roads corridor is one of the top 200-mile High-Speed Rail corridors in the country.  The corridor has independent utility  The corridor provides connectivity with the Southeast and Northeast corridors. 350 Philadelphia-Harrisburg- Pittsburg 300 Cleveland-Columbus- Corridor Length (mile) Cincinnati 250 Miami-Orlando Dallas-Houston Portland-Seattle 200 Washington- Charlotte-Raleigh Atlanta-Birmingham Hampton Roads 150 Cleveland-Detroit Cleveland-Pittsburg 100 Orlando-Tampa 50 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Population (million) 2 TEMS, Inc.

  4. DRPT has initiated the development of the corridor using conventional technology This includes -  Introducing rail service to South Hampton Roads  Planning to upgrade service to a maximum of 90-mph  Developing critical connections for Southeast High- Speed Rail (SEHSR) and Northeast (NEC) corridors  Increasing frequencies to 6 trains on the NS/Route 460 segment, and 3 trains on the CSXT/I-64 segment  Improving access to Richmond Main Street Station  Developing new stations along the routes This lays the foundations for developing an effective high-speed rail program 3 TEMS, Inc.

  5. High-Speed Rail Eliminates Annual Subsidy Increasing speed to 110-mph produces a positive operating ratio that meets FRA financial criteria. STEP 3 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 4 CSXT/ CSXT/ NS/ NS/ CSXT/ CSXT/ NS/ NS/ 0 0 I-64 I-64 Route 460 Route 460 I-64 I-64 Route 460 Route 460 2025 Operating Ratio 2025 Operating Ratio 1.06 1.06 1.19 1.19 1.52 1.52 1.51 1.51 4 TEMS, Inc.

  6. High-Speed Rail in the Washington- Richmond-Hampton Roads Corridor Achieves FRA Financial and Economic Funding Criteria  Positive Operating Ratio with Operating Surplus  Positive Cost Benefit Ratio – Good for the Corridor – Good for Virginia – Good for the Country 5 TEMS, Inc.

  7. Capital Cost and Funding  Capital Cost – Steps 3 and 4 Cost $3 – 6 Billion respectively  Funding Approach - Two Options  80 percent of funding from USDOT FRA, Local match from station development/parking  30-60 percent from public-private partnership (P3), Design, Build, Own, Operate, Maintain and Finance (DBOOM-F) 6 TEMS, Inc.

  8. Benefits 1: Both Corridors have High-Speed Rail Potential: Travel Times and Train Frequency can be dramatically improved NS/Route 460: 150-mph CSXT/I-64: 110-130-mph Travel Times 2:05 2:00 Train Frequencies 6 – 8 Trains 14 – 16 Trains 7 TEMS, Inc.

  9. Benefits 2: The System Largely Diverts Auto Traffic; Reducing Congestion on highways I-64 and I-95 CSXT/I-64 Corridor NS/Route 460 Corridor Natural Growth Natural Growth Induced Demand Induced Demand 1.6% 1.9% 9.5% 7.6% Diverted Demand Diverted Demand 88.9% 90.5% “85 - 90 Percent of Rail Demand is from Auto” 8 TEMS, Inc.

  10. Benefits 3: Joint Development Potential is Considerable at Stations Proposed San Jose High-Speed Rail Station Proposed Sacramento High-Speed Rail Station 9 TEMS, Inc.

  11. Benefits 4: Supplyside Impacts are Very Significant Productivity jobs Income ($) Property Values ($) (person years of work) Washington, DC – 430-480 thousand 3.5 – 4 billion 0.5-0.8 billion North Virginia Area Richmond – 230-250 thousand 1.2 – 1.5 billion 0.15-0.2 billion Petersburg Area Norfolk- 0.8 – 1 billion 140-170 thousand 0.8-1 billion Newport News Area 5.5 – 6.5 billion 1.45 – 2 billion Total 0.8-0.9 million 10 TEMS, Inc.

  12. Conclusions  HRTPO Objectives can be achieved  High-Speed Rail generates very significant benefits for the corridors communities  The Washington-Richmond-Hampton Roads corridor is of national importance  High-Speed Rail generates very significant benefits for the corridors communities  The corridor is a critical element of the Southeast High-Speed Rail (SEHSR) and Northeast Corridor (NEC) 11 TEMS, Inc.

  13. Challenges of Developing the High-Speed Rail Corridor  Long-term HSR Funding – Initial USDOT $8B funding but national program opportunities require much more.  FRA/Environmental Processes – Process for HSR implementation is lengthy and cumbersome. More rules being added to implementation / time to develop / programming.  In the change of rules the lack of a designated “Virginia” HSR corridor and HSR Service Plan hinder applying for HSR funds. 12 TEMS, Inc.

  14. Recommendations  VA Department of Rail and Public Transportation should continue the implementation of the Intercity Rail Alternatives Steps 1 & 2.  Pursue USDOT designation of the Washington-Richmond-Hampton Roads HSR corridor as a Virginia corridor having independent utility (e.g., the Chesapeake Bay corridor).  Complete the High-Speed Rail Vision by developing the Vision Plan/Service Plan for FRA Funding.  Consider implementing High-Speed Rail with a Public-Private Partnership Process 13 TEMS, Inc.

  15. Thank You 14 TEMS, Inc.

Recommend


More recommend