COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS - PDF document

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA CRITICAL PATH APPROACH TO BY D. J. LAMB AND P. F. O'NEILL OPERATIONAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS NATIONAL DEFENCE HEADQUARTERS OTTAWA, CANADA

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION METRICS zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA DEFINITIONS PARADIGMS CF zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA AND MEASURES TIMELINES DEFINITIONS zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA LAND FORCE EXAMPLE COMMAND zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA CF AIR FORCE EXAMPLE CONCLUSIONS (1) zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA 0 THE AUTHORITY VESTED IN AN INDIVIDUAL OF THE ARMED FORCES FOR THE DIRECTION, COORDINATION, AND CONTROL OF MILITARY FORCES. THE EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY AND DIRECTION BY A PROPERLY (2) DESIGNATED COMMANDER OVER ASSIGNED FORCES IN THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF A MISSION.

(1) zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA - 2 - CONTROL THE AUTHORITY EXERCISED BY A COMMANDER OVER PART OF THE ACTIVITIES OF SUBORDINATE ORGANIZATIONS, OR OTHER ORGANIZATIONS NOT NORMALLY UNDER HIS COMMAND, WHICH ENCOMPASSESS THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ... MAY BE IMPLEMENTING ORDERS OR DIRECTIVES. TRANSFERRED OR DELEGATED. COMMAND AND CONTROL FUNCTIONS ARE PERFORMED (2) THROUGH AN ARRANGEMENT OF PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT, COMMUNICATIONS, FACILITIES AND PROCEDURES EMPLOYED BY A COMMANDER IN PLANNING, DIRECTING, COORDINATING, AND CONTROLLING FORCES AND OPERATIONS IN THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE MISSION. CCIS A COMMAND, CONTROL, AND INFORMATION SYSTEM (CCIS) IS AN INTEGRATED SYSTEM COMPRISED OF DOCTRINE, PROCEDURES, ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT, FACILITIES AND COMMUNICATIONS WHICH PROVIDES AUTHORITIES AT ALL LEVELS WITH TIMELY AND ADEQUATE DATA TO PLAN, DIRECT AND CONTROL THEIR ACTIVITIES.

- 3 - C3 zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA C"1" COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS (C3) m = 3 + COMPUTERS m = 4 n = l INTEL n = 2 INFORMATION ADDITIONAL TERMS FOR COMMAND & CONTROL + COORDINATION, CAPABILITY, COMPATABILITY, m 1 5 CONSULTATION, . . . INTEROPERABILITY, INTEGRATION/FUSION, . . . n 2 3 IRRELEVANT TERM FOR COMMAND & CONTROL COMMAND DESTRUCT SIGNAL

PARADIGMS zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA - 4 - zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA 0 SPCDA (LAWSON) SAGSPD (MORS NPG WORKSHOP) METRICS zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA MCES 0 HEAT MOPS zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA 0 ACCES 0 SHOR 0 C2RM (MAYK&RUBIN) AND MEASURES BIT ERROR RATE; END TO END DELAY PDET; PFA; COVERAGE VOLUME MOEs No OF TARGETS DESTROYED PER DAY SURVIV ABLXTY MOFEs BDE SUCCESS AT BREACHING MINEFIELD MOPES VICTORY OR DEFEAT; TERMS; IMPACT ON FUTURE

2 zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA ' zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA \ ;LO~~.INAsLBY. , zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA V C 0 " l m l .Cl f 1 SCMSC 4 zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Launch under attack timeline. ATTACK zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA U W C N Of SOVIE1 ICIY. IMPACTS FROM K * Y AND SLIMS IMPACTS r? UNDER ,A zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA 4 LAUNCHES zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA 0 5 1 0 2 0 2 s 30 YlNS 1 s S A l L L L I l E S RADARS DETECT DETECT SLIM. I I I I 1 I DE ECTION + I I I 1 I 0 30 5 2 0 2 5 1 0 1 s YINS NUCLEAR DElECllON SVSILY DETECTS SLBM DElONAlIONS PwPanE AND CONflRYAlION: IRANSY11 ASSEMILL LYERGEWCI m s i nmu.LEvLL ACllON L A U W C . DElONAlION MESSAGE SL OUE.Cf h LAUNCH 10 zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA I ATTACK ACTIONS Y S S l l t A S S E Y B L L DECISION DLCOOL AND ~ 1 R S 1 L A 5 1 L O W L E V E L A U l M t N f l C l f f . I . , L E A O L R S YI.<ll L A W A V

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Diaanm Derived from US Army Declslon M o m - e b/ zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Planning zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA nand Brlaade zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA y- A - - .

(1992) zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA FIGHTER GROUP DEPLOYMENT PLAN zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Yellowknife, NWT zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA 360 DEPLOYMENT OF FIGHTER AIRCRAFT TO FORWARD OPERATING LOCATIONS: 1 Comox, B.C. 1 Inuvik, NWT from Cold Lake, Alberta I 1 from Bagotville lqaluit, NWT I Goose Bay, Labrador Quebec NORAD AIR SOVEREIGNTY MISSION ANALYSIS CARRIED OUT ON 1992 VERSION OF THE PLAN by Operational Research Field Station Fighter Group / Canadian NORAD Region HQ FIGHTER GROUP DEPLOYMENT PLAN 360 (1992) SIMPLIFIED PERT VIEW

. zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA U .

TO AN APPRORIATE LEVEL zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA SIMPLIFIED PERT VIEW WAS EXPANDED OF DETAIL I PRINCIPAL zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA WARNING PHASE: AIRLIFT OF ADVANCE PARTIES TO FOLs I CF-18 LOAD CONFIGURATION & PREPARATION I ATG RECALL OF CC130S & KC-130s I RECONFIGURATION OF CC1 30s & KC1 30s KC-130 FINAL PREPARATION & DEPLOYMENT zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA I DEPLOYMENT OF CT-33s TO FOLs ATCCU PREPARATION FOR AIRLIFT 1 SUB-STEPS I MODELLED I DEPLOYMENT PHASE: I AIRLIFT OF PERSONNEL & MATERIEL TO FOLs I CF-18 FINAL PREPARATION & DEPLOYMENT I FINDINGS AIRLIFT COULD NOT BE COMPLETED WITHIN THE TARGET COMPLETION TIME IMPACT OF SHORTFALLS MIGHT BE MINIMIZED BY: LOAD PRlORlTlZTlON I 2 DE STI N AT1 ON PRIOR IT AT I ON INCREASED DAILY FLYING RATES AUGMENTING AIRLIFT ASSETS

The ABCA Scenario zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA A 2 - Issues for Analysis Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 66027 zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Mr. William J. Krondak WG) with scenario efforts zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA TRADOC Analysis Center Scenario and Wargaming Center Abstract The Scenario and Wargaming Center has supported the American, British, Canadian and f o r more than , Australian (ABCA) Quacfripartite Working Groups (Q such topics zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA f o r two years. 7he scenarios are designed to assist the ABCA Q WG develop concepts standardization agreements and plans that allow those nations to cooperate in engagements winning the information war and dealing with zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA fiom operations other than war (OOrw) to mid-intensity conventional battles. This ranging paper briefly describes the background of the most recent scenario eflort, the scenario development criteria, the scenario overview, and some analytical issues that the scenario force. zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA f o r examining the supports. The scenario provides a realistic, reasonable, and robust setting activities of rapidly deployed ABCA forces at brigade, division, and corps level. It generates opportunities f o r analysis o f doctrine, organization, equipment, and command and control issues o f combat intensity. The scenario allows exploration o f a s across a Jpectrum c o m m d , control, communications, and intelligence (C3I) in a multinational Introduction : 1 1.1 : The Scenario and Wargaming Center built the ABCA scenario to assist the ABCA QWG develop and explore doctrinal concepts. Each participating nation developed a scenario at the request of the Washington Standardization Office. T h i s scenario focuses on mid-intensity operations requiring the commitment of ABCA forces in corps strength. The scenario is designed to be used as a test bed for interoperability, not contingency planning. It is incorporated in the latest ABCA doctrine guide. 1.2: T h i s paper covers the background of this effort, provides an overview of the scenario, and discusses some of the analytical issues that the scenario generates. 1.3: The scenario provides a realistic, reasonable, and robust setting for examining the activities of rapidly deployed ABCA forces at levels from brigade through corps. Although set in a fictitious country, the scenario uses actual terrain and weather to facilitate simulation and analysis efforts. It represents a significant effort to create a useful and plausible setting. Many of the details reflect arbitrary choices and can be modified at the user‘s discretion to support analysis. 1