Cluster Report Climate, Energy and Mobility ERA-LEARN, Discussion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cluster Report ‘Climate, Energy and Mobility’ ERA-LEARN, Discussion paper 15.05.2019

Tour de Table Page 2 first-name LAST-NAME BADGE/TABLE which-networks-and-initiatives-are-you-representing Lucie BEAUMEL GREEN VEHICLES INITIATIVE European Green Vehicles Initiative Association Beata BIBROWSKA JPI URBAN EUROPE JPI URBAN EUROPE Karen BÖHME JPI URBAN EUROPE JPI Urban Europe, EXPAND, SUGI Jonas BYLUND JPI URBAN EUROPE JPI Urban Europe Almudena CARRERO ACT,ERA.MIN, ERA4CS, AXIS, GEOTHERMIA, SOLAR ERANET, BIODIVERSCEN, Evelyn ECHEVERRIA German Federal Ministry of Research and Innovation, NKS-Umwelt Jan-Arne EILERTSEN ERA-LEARN ERA-LEARN Michael ERDMANN EUROFUSION EUROfusion Coordinator Unit Hans Arne FRØYSTEIN EURAMET/ EMPIR EURAMET eV and EMPIR Emilia GENANGELI EUROFUSION EUROfusion Administration Enrique GIRON CLEAN HYDROGEN Clean Hydrogen Charles GIRY-DELOISON JPI CULTURAL HERITAGE JPI Cultural Heritage Ken GUY Maurice HANEGRAAF TNO Angus HUNTER ERA-LEARN ERA-LEARN Christophe JOST OCEANERA-NET OCEANERA-NET Cofund Karoliina KOHO BANOS CSA BANOS CSA Carina LEMKE FORESTVALUE ForestValue Bruno MASTANTUONO CLEAN SKY JU Clean Sky JU Angels ORDUNA-CAO SPIRE CPPP SPIRE cPPP Ragnhild RØNNEBERG ERA NET ACT ERA NET ACT (Accellerating CCS technologies) Julija SAKOVICA Helen SPENCE-JACKSON EIT-KIC CLIMATE EIT Climate KIC Piotr SWIATEK Team drafting Co-Funded Partnerhip in HUE Cluster 4 Mª Ángeles VALBUENA Chris YOUNG BESTF / DEMOWIND BESTF and DemoWind ERA-NETs Eleni ZIKA BBI JU Biobased Industries Joint Undertaking ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis

Background Page 3 Partnership analyses in relation to the cluster ‘Climate, Energy and Mobility’ under Pillar II “ Global Challenges and Industrial Competitiveness” of Horizon Europe (Commission proposal): The intervention areas of the cluster ‘Climate, The cluster includes 52 fully relevant Energy and Mobility’: partnerships, networks or governance structures: ▬ Climate science and solutions ▬ 26 P2Ps (21 ERA-NET Cofunds, 2 JPIs, 2 EJP ▬ Energy supply Cofunds, 1 Art 185 initiative) ▬ Energy systems and grids ▬ 2 cPPPs ▬ Buildings and industrial facilities in energy ▬ 5 Art 187 transition ▬ 9 ETIPs ▬ Communities and cities ▬ 6 ETPs ▬ Industrial competitiveness in transport ▬ 3 EIT-KICs ▬ Clean transport and mobility ▬ 1 EIPs ▬ Smart mobility ▬ Energy storage ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis

Overview current networks and governance structures Page 4 Nr. and Type of Fully Relevant Networks per Intervention Area ▬ large variety of partnerships 30 (only omission is FET Flagships). 25 ▬ most populated area is ‘energy supply’ - broad ERIC range of partnership types. EIP 20 ETP/ETIP ▬ least populated area is ERA-NET Cofund ‘buildings and industrial JPI 15 facilities in energy EJP transition’. FET cPPP ▬ ERA-NET Cofunds are 10 EIT more frequent in the climate A185 and energy sub-clusters. A187 5 ▬ The mobility sub-cluster is dominated by A187s and ETPs. 0 Climate science and Energy supply Energy systems and Buildings and Communities and Industrial Clean transport and Smart mobility Energy Storage solutions grids industrial facilities in Cities Competitiveness in mobility Energy Transition Transport ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis

Overview current partnerships related to the interventions areas Page 5 ▬ Two of the nine intervention areas (climate science and solutions, energy supply) have a relatively high concentration of partnerships ▬ Significant number of partnerships that are cross- cutting (links to at least two intervention areas) ▬ A187 ECSEL, EIP Smart Cities & Communities and JPI Urban Europe are the most cross-cutting ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis

Connections between partnerships and networks to the sub- cluster ‘Climate’ Page 6 Formal Connection: CLIMATE Several JPIs and their associated Cofunds P2Ps PPPs Existing collaboration: Article 185 Art. 187 EIP EMPIR CleanSky2 Smart Cities and PRIMA ECSEL Lack of evidence of Communities FCH Water collaboration between EJP partnerships that appear to EIT-KIC cPPP ERA-NET Cofund Climate have some synergy EeB ACT EGVI AXIS EN-SUGI ERA4CS ERA-PLANET FACCE ERA-GAS ERIC ETIP/ETP Waterworks2015 Waterworks2017 ECCSEL ETP WssTP SC5-21-2019-2020 LifeWatch ETIP ZEP LC-SFS-20-2019 EMSO SFS-31-2019 ICOS LC-CLA-09-2019 Eur-Argo JPI Climate FET FACCE Urban Europe Water ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis

Connections between partnerships and networks to the sub- cluster ‘Energy’ Page 7 Formal Connection: ENERGY JPI Urban Europe and its Cofunds PPPs P2Ps Article 185 Existing collaboration: EIP Art. 187 EMPIR Smart Cities and ECSEL Communities FCH Geothermica ERA-NET Cofund EJP CONCERT is represented on the Steering EUROfusion Board of ETIP Deep EIT-KIC cPPP ERA-NET Cofund EeB InnoEnergy ACT Geothermal FoF BESTF3 CSP ERANET Demowind Demowind2 ERIC ENSCC EN-SUGI ECCSEL Coordinating ETIP ERANet SmartGridPlus Bioenergy EN SGplusRegSys Deep Geothermal GEOERA Ocean GEOTHERMICA influence of Photovoltaics PV Sec OCEAN-ERA-NET Cofund RHC SOLAR-ERA.NET Cofund SNET Solar Cofund2 FET SNETP LC-SC3-ES-9-2019 the SET-Plan Wind ZEP JPI Urban Europe ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis

Connections between partnerships and networks to the sub- cluster ‘Mobility’ Page 8 Formal Connection: MOBILITY JPI Urban Europe and its Cofunds P2Ps PPPs Art. 187s and cPPPs that were Article 185 EIP Art. 187 AAL2 Active and Healthy Aging CleanSky2 derived from their associated EMPIR Raw Materials ECSEL Smart Cities and FCH Communities SESAR ETPs Shift2Rail EJP Existing collaboration: cPPP EIT-KIC FoF InnoEnergy ERA-NET Cofund EGVI JPI Urban Europe and JPI Urban Mobility EMEurope ENSCC Climate have collaborated (with ENSUF EN-SUGI ETP NORFACE) to implement T2S ERANet SmartGridPlus ACARE ERIC EN SGplusRegSys ALICE T2S (ERA-NET Cofund on ERRAC MG-4-6-2019 ERTRAC Waterborne ‘transformations to FET JPI sustainability’) Urban Europe Climate ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis

Main observations and questions Page 9 Main observations: ▬ All types of partnerships/networks (apart from FET Flagships) are represented in this Cluster ▬ With some notable exceptions, the apparent level of connectivity between the various networks and partnerships is weak. ▬ Apart from the energy sub-cluster (where the coordinating influence of the SET-Plan is apparent), the connections between the P2P and non-P2P world are limited. Questions to consider: ▬ What is the level of synergy, cooperation and engagement between JPI Climate, the Climate KIC and other partnerships that are aimed at reducing climate impacts ▬ Are there any frameworks (like the SET-Plan) that could foster more collaborative activity between the P2Ps and the other partnerships/networks in the mobility areas ▬ What would be the benefits of strengthening cooperation between partnerships/networks that appear to have synergies ▬ What are the main barriers to collaboration between partnerships that have synergetic objectives, activities and/or stakeholders and the critical enabling factors for such collaboration ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis

Thank you.

Session 1: Conclusions Page 11 ▬ Are there any important aspects missing in the Discussion Paper? ▬ What have been the main strengths and achievements of the existing partnership landscape? ▬ What have been the main challenges? ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis

Session 2: Guiding Questions Page 12 Past and current experiences ▬ What kind of interactions did/do you have with other (P2P, PPP) networks and which are these networks? ▬ How did/does this contribute to achieving your partnership’s objectives and/or improve performance? Ideas for future developments ▬ What are the challenges of the new partnership proposal? ▬ How could cooperation between different types of partnerships be improved to support the reformation of the partnership landscape? ▬ How can your partnership contribute to increase coherence in the partnership landscape? ▬ Which actions need to be taken? By whom? ERA-LEARN Thematic Analysis