bounds on 4d conformal and superconformal field theories
play

Bounds on 4D Conformal and Superconformal Field Theories David - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Bounds on 4D Conformal and Superconformal Field Theories David Simmons-Duffin Harvard University January 26, 2011 (with David Poland


  1. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Bounds on 4D Conformal and Superconformal Field Theories David Simmons-Duffin Harvard University January 26, 2011 (with David Poland [arXiv:1009.2087])

  2. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Motivation ◮ Near-conformal dynamics could play a role in BSM physics! ◮ Walking/Conformal Technicolor [Many people...] ◮ Conformal Sequestering [Luty, Sundrum ’01; Schmaltz, Sundrum ’06] ◮ Solution to µ/Bµ problem [Roy, Schmaltz ’07; Murayama, Nomura, Poland ’07] ◮ Flavor Hierarchies [Georgi, Nelson, Manohar ’83; Nelson, Strassler ’00] ◮ ... ◮ However, many of these ideas involve statements about operator dimensions that are difficult to check. ◮ In non-SUSY theories, hard to calculate anything! Lattice studies may be only hope. ◮ In N = 1 SCFTs, we actually know lots about chiral operators, but not much about non-chiral operators...

  3. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Example: Nelson-Strassler Flavor Models [’00] ◮ Idea: Matter fields T i have large anomalous dimensions under some CFT, flavor hierarchies generated dynamically! W = T 1 O 1 + T 2 O 2 + y ij T i T j H + . . . ◮ Interactions of matter T i with CFT operators O i are marginal ◮ Yukawa couplings y ij are irrelevant, flow to zero at a rate controlled by dim T i ◮ Since T i are chiral, dim T i = 3 2 R T i ◮ Can write down lots of concrete models and then calculate dimensions using a-maximization! [Poland, DSD ’09]

  4. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Example: Nelson-Strassler Flavor Models [’00] pl X † XT † 1 ◮ Flavor violating soft-mass operators K ∼ i T j also M 2 flow to zero, rate depends on dim T † i T j ◮ Maybe can solve SUSY flavor problem? But no 4D tools to calculate dimensions... ◮ Can we say anything about dim T † T , given dim T ? ◮ Recently Rattazzi, Rychkov, Tonni, Vichi [arXiv:0807.0004, arXiv:0905.2211] addressed a similar question in non-SUSY CFTs, deriving bounds on dim φ 2 as a function of dim φ ...

  5. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Goals Generalizing their methods, we’ll compute ◮ Bounds on dimensions of nonchiral operators in SCFTs ◮ Bounds on central charges in general CFTs and SCFTs

  6. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Outline 1 CFT Review 2 Bounds from Crossing Relations 3 Superconformal Blocks 4 Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs 5 Outlook

  7. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Outline 1 CFT Review 2 Bounds from Crossing Relations 3 Superconformal Blocks 4 Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs 5 Outlook

  8. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook CFT Review: Primary Operators ◮ In addition to Poincar´ e generators, a CFT has a dilatation generator D and special conformal generators K a ◮ Primary operators O I (0) are defined by the condition [ K a , O I (0)] = 0 (descendants obtained by acting with P a ) ◮ Primary 2-pt functions �O I ( x 1 ) O J ( x 2 ) � and 3-pt functions � φ ( x 1 ) φ ( x 2 ) O I ( x 3 ) � fixed by conformal symmetry in terms of dimensions and spins, up to overall coefficients λ O ◮ Higher n -pt functions not fixed by conformal symmetry alone, but are determined once operator spectrum and 3-pt function coefficients λ O are known...

  9. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook CFT Review: Operator Product Expansion Let φ be a scalar primary of dimension d in a 4D CFT: � λ O C I ( x, P ) O I (0) φ ( x ) φ (0) = (OPE) O∈ φ × φ ◮ Sum runs over primary O ’s ◮ C I ( x, P ) fixed by conformal symmetry [Dolan, Osborn ’00] ◮ O I = O a 1 ...a l can be any spin- l Lorentz representation (traceless symmetric tensor) with l = 0 , 2 , . . . ◮ Unitarity tells us that λ O is real

  10. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook CFT Review: Conformal Block Decomposition Use OPE to evaluate 4-point function � φ ( x 1 ) φ ( x 2 ) φ ( x 3 ) φ ( x 4 ) � � λ 2 O C I ( x 12 , ∂ 2 ) C J ( x 34 , ∂ 4 ) �O I ( x 2 ) O J ( x 4 ) � = O∈ φ × φ 1 � λ 2 ≡ O g ∆ ,l ( u, v ) x 2 d 12 x 2 d 34 O∈ φ × φ ◮ u = x 2 12 x 2 24 , v = x 2 14 x 2 24 conformally-invariant cross ratios. 34 23 x 2 13 x 2 x 2 13 x 2 ◮ g ∆ ,l ( u, v ) conformal block ( ∆ = dim O and l = spin of O )

  11. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook CFT Review: Conformal Blocks Explicit formula [Dolan, Osborn ’00] ( − 1) l zz g ∆ ,l ( u, v ) = z − z [ k ∆+ l ( z ) k ∆ − l − 2 ( z ) − z ↔ z ] 2 l x β/ 22 F 1 ( β/ 2 , β/ 2 , β ; x ) , k β ( x ) = where u = zz and v = (1 − z )(1 − z ) . ◮ Similar expressions in other even dimensions, recursion relations known in odd dimensions ◮ Alternatively can be viewed as eigenfunctions of the quadratic casimir of the conformal group [Dolan, Osborn ’03]

  12. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook CFT Review: Crossing Relations ◮ Four-point function � φ ( x 1 ) φ ( x 2 ) φ ( x 3 ) φ ( x 4 ) � is clearly symmetric under permutations of x i ◮ After OPE, symmetry is non-manifest! ◮ Switching x 1 ↔ x 3 gives the “crossing relation”: � u � d � � λ 2 λ 2 O g ∆ ,l ( u, v ) = O g ∆ ,l ( v, u ) v O∈ φ × φ O∈ φ × φ 1 4 1 4 � � O = O 2 3 2 3 ◮ Other permutations give no new information ◮ λ 2 O positive by unitarity

  13. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Outline 1 CFT Review 2 Bounds from Crossing Relations 3 Superconformal Blocks 4 Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs 5 Outlook

  14. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Review: Method of Rattazzi et. al. [arXiv:0807.0004] ◮ Let’s study the OPE coefficient of a particular O 0 ∈ φ × φ ◮ We can rewrite crossing relation as � λ 2 λ 2 − O 0 F ∆ 0 ,l 0 ( u, v ) = 1 O F ∆ ,l ( u, v ) , O� = O 0 � �� � ���� � �� � unit op. O 0 everything else where v d g ∆ ,l ( u, v ) − u d g ∆ ,l ( v, u ) ≡ F ∆ ,l ( u, v ) . u d − v d

  15. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Review: Method of Rattazzi et. al. [arXiv:0807.0004] Idea: Find a linear functional α such that α ( F ∆ 0 ,l 0 ) = 1 , and α ( F ∆ ,l ) ≥ 0 , for all other O ∈ φ × φ. Applying to both sides: � � � λ 2 λ 2 α O 0 F ∆ 0 ,l 0 = α (1 − O F ∆ ,l ) O� = O 0 � λ 2 λ 2 = α (1) − O α ( F ∆ ,l ) ≤ α (1) O 0 O� = O 0 since λ 2 O ≥ 0 by unitarity.

  16. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Review: Method of Rattazzi et. al. [arXiv:0807.0004] ◮ To make the bound λ 2 O 0 ≤ α (1) as strong as possible, can minimize α (1) subject to the constraints α ( F ∆ 0 ,l 0 ) = 1 and α ( F ∆ ,l ) ≥ 0 ( O � = O 0 ). ◮ This is an infinite dimensional linear programming problem... to use known algorithms (e.g., simplex) we must make it finite ◮ Can take α to be linear combinations of derivatives at some point in z, z space � a mn ∂ m z ∂ n α : F ( z, z ) �→ z F (1 / 2 , 1 / 2) m + n ≤ 2 k ◮ Discretize constraints to α ( F ∆ i ,l i ) ≥ 0 for D = { (∆ i , l i ) } ◮ Take k, D → ∞ to recover “optimal” bound

  17. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Review: Method of Rattazzi et. al. [arXiv:0807.0004] ◮ Can do this under any assumptions we want ◮ E.g., can assume that all scalars appearing in the OPE φ × φ have dimension larger than some ∆ min = dim O 0 ◮ If λ 2 O 0 ≤ α (1) < 0 , there is a contradiction with unitarity and the assumed spectrum can be ruled out By scanning over different ∆ min , one can obtain bounds on dim φ 2 as a function of d = dim φ

  18. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Bounds on dim φ 2 (taken from arXiv:0905.2211)

  19. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Bounds on dim φ 2 (taken from arXiv:0905.2211)

  20. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Bounds on dim φ 2 (taken from arXiv:0905.2211)

  21. CFT Review Bounds from Crossing Relations Superconformal Blocks Bounds on CFTs and SCFTs Outlook Bounds on dim φ 2 (taken from arXiv:0905.2211)

Recommend


More recommend