Address Theme and National Address Database Update NSGIC 2017 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Address Theme and National Address Database Update NSGIC 2017 Midyear Meeting Presented by Steve Lewis, Department of Transportation Lynda Liptrap, Census Bureau March 1 st , 2017

Topics  NAD update  Theme management process  NAD Federal User Requirements Workshop 2

Theme Management Process  Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC)  Portfolio of A-16 Themes and Datasets  National Geospatial Data Assets (NGDA)  NGDA Management Plan 3

Roles and Responsibilities  Address Theme Leads  DOT - Steve Lewis  Census Bureau – Lynda Liptrap  Address Theme Subcommittee  DOT – Steve Lewis  Census Bureau – Mark Lange  NAD Dataset Manager  Census Bureau – Matt Zimolzak  Technology Operations Manager  DOT - Steve Lewis 4

Address Theme Subcommittee  16 Agency Members Department or Agency Department or Agency Census Bureau Department of Labor Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Department of Transportation Department of Education Department of Veterans Affairs Department of Energy Federal Emergency Management Agency Department of Homeland Security National Technical Information Service Department of Housing and Urban Office of Management and Budget Development Department of the Interior U.S. Postal Service Department of Justice Social Security Administration 5

Address Theme Subcommittee  25+ Non-federal Partners Partner Partner State of Arkansas State of North Carolina State of California State of New Hampshire District of Columbia National States Geographic Information Council Commonwealth of Massachusetts State of Oregon State of Michigan Oakland County, Michigan State of Minnesota City of Philadelphia State of Montana Urban and Regional Information Systems Association National Association of State 911 State of Vermont Administrators State of New Jersey Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 6

Address Theme and NAD Goals  Develop Theme Definition  Finalize Subcommittee Charter  Establish Theme Community on the GeoPlatform  Gather and Refine NAD User Requirements  Assess the DOT Pilot Database  Develop a Theme Strategic Plan 7

FGDC Theme Management  Components and Deliverables  Theme Strategic Plan  Theme Implementation Plan  NAD Lifecycle Maturity Assessment  Provide annual updates to the FGDC Coordination Group and Steering Committee 8

Theme Implementation Plan 9

LMA Stages and Questions 10

Performance Dashboard on GeoPlatform 11

NAD Federal User Requirements Workshop 12

Workshop Process  Pre-workshop questionnaire  Content  Metadata  Functional  Presentations  Address theme management and NAD background  Results from the questionnaire  Breakout sessions  Review questionnaire results  Add requirements if necessary  Prioritize requirements  Summary of breakout sessions 13

Results and Analysis NAD Uses 12 Address Verification/Inventory Decision-Making/Policy Development Planning 10 Emergency Response Impact Analysis 8 Fraud Detection Other 1 Survey Execution 6 Service Delivery Facility Management 4 Risk Assessment Mailing List Funding Allocation 2 Compliance Notification Enumeration 0 Total 14

Results and Analysis (Continued) Address Point Location Update Frequency Front Door Only Building Footprint Centroid 2 Annually 3 3 Parcel Centroid Quarterly 2 6 No Preference Continuously 2 3 All Doors Biannually 1 1 1 Post Office Mail Receptacle 12 Data Management Model Address Type 10 No 8 Residential Preference Commercial 6 4 Distributed Governmental/Public 6 4 Other 2 Centralized 2 0 Total 15

Content Requirements  Key take-away points  Federal agencies identified additional requirements  NAD Pilot minimum content met the needs of other Federal agencies  Top five additional content needs  Alternate street names  Unit type  Postal City/State abbreviation  Multi-unit structure flag  Geocode confidence and accuracy 16

Metadata Requirements  Key take-away  Top three needs are essential, remaining are desirable  Top five metadata needs  Address coordinate reference system  Coordinate reference system authority  Indicator of quality  Unique ID s  Address lifecycle 17

Functional Requirements  Key take-away points  Bulk download serves 90% of agencies needs  Functionality beyond tools on Geospatial Platform would be useful  Top five functional needs  Feedback mechanisms Error correction • • Functionality development  Download tools such as subset download, queuing  Anytime access via cloud  Batch geocoding service  Ability to feed updates to classified systems 18

Topics for Further Discussion  Overall workflow  Maintenance  Quality  Unique IDs  Linkages to other datasets  Infrastructure points (manholes, fire hydrants)  Building footprints, parcels, etc. 19

Next Steps  Report of workshop findings and recommendations  Continue discussions on NAD and address topics at monthly Address Subcommittee meetings 20

Address Theme and NAD Team Contacts Steve Lewis Lynda Liptrap steve.lewis@dot.gov lynda.a.liptrap@census.gov 202-366-9223 301-763-1058 Matt Zimolzak Mark Lange matthew.a.zimolzak@census.gov mark.d.lange@census.gov