Wheatland-Chili Central School District Board of Education - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Wheatland-Chili Central School District Board of Education Presentation Jennifer Sinsebox, Director of Curriculum September 25, 2012 1

 What do schools and districts look like when they are organized around a commitment to the achievement of high standards by all students?  What is my role in creating, implementing, and maintaining such a school and district? 2

District’s Strategic Plan Teachers’ Center Grant Title I and IIA Grants Common Core Race To The Top Grant District’s General Fund Data Driven Instruction APPR (Inquiry Teams) Committees, Grade Level, Team, Faculty Meeting Times 3

How will students PLAN What will students learn? learn? AC ENHANCING COMMON CORE PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PRACTICE - STANDARDS APPR STUDENT LEARNING TEACH APPLY What will we do when students are not learning? COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY PROCESS RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION REFLECT 4

Allows students to graduate and succeed in:  Credit-bearing college courses without remediation (75% in ELA and 80% in math)  Entry Level Careers  Workforce training programs “This work is about preparing students for college and career. It’s about improving teaching and learning.” Commissioner King 5

 Through the Common Core State Standards , we will ensure that students will: ◦ Experience literacy through the content areas ◦ Read texts more closely and at higher levels  Balance on literature and informational texts (50%) ◦ Write from a variety of sources and write compelling arguments ◦ Develop a deep understanding of math concepts 6

 Through data driven instruction , we will ◦ Focus on learning how to help all students learn more effectively ◦ Make sure we are assessing with consistency with a level of rigor that set students up for success ◦ Use common interim (formative) assessments at least quarterly across all teachers of the same grade level 7

Observation Infer and Go Visual Predict and Analysis Question • Identify other • Occurs prior to • Makes Data come • Patterns viewing data alive data needs • Trends • Identify Greatest • Involves self- • Highlight • Surprises reflection percentage Area of Need correct • Think about assumptions • Aligned with College and • Make Career Readiness predictions Criteria 8

 Through the APPR process , we will use:  Evidence-based observations to improve teaching and learning  Charlotte Danielson 2011 Rubric  The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument , Charlotte Danielson, 2011  Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Effective Teaching , Charlotte Danielson  Teachscape – A comprehensive online training system for teachers and classroom observers 9

We know, (and there’s a lot of research on the matter), that of all the factors that contribute to student learning, the single most important one, that happens in the school, is the quality of teaching. Charlotte Danielson Talk About Teaching! 10

• Student • Professional Growth Practice Analysis Inform Adjust Monitor • Community • Organizational Support Structures 11

 STAR K-12 Reading and  In-District Math  3-8 ELA, Math & Science  Achieve 3000 4/8  Regionally created Student  Regents Learning Objective (SLO) Pre/Post Assessments Existing Measures Additional Measures (new) 12

 Increased percentage of students who met the standards (scoring at or above Level 3) on the ELA assessment in: ◦ ELA 7 from 59% in 2010-2011 to 64% in 2011-2012. 13

 Increased percentage of students who met the standards (scoring at or above Level 3) on the Math assessment in: ◦ Math 6 from 72% in 2010-2011 to 79% in 2011-2012; and ◦ Math 7 from 64% in 2010-2011 to 75% in 2011-2012 (with 33% of students continuing to meet the standards with distinction).  Increased percentage of students who met the standards with distinction (scoring at Level 4) in: ◦ ELA 5 from 2% in 2010-2011 to 6% in 2011-2012; ◦ ELA 7 from 1% in 2010-2011 to 11% in 2011-2012; ◦ ELA 8 from 4% in 2010-2011 to 5% in 2011-2012; ◦ Math 5 from 18% in 2010-2011 to 31% in 2011-2012; and ◦ Science 4 from 47% in 2010-2011 to 61% in 2011-2012. 14

 Increased percentage of students who met the Regents standards (scoring at or above 65%) in ◦ ELA from 95% in 2010-2011 to 98% in 2011-2012; ◦ Geometry from 90% in 2010-2011 to 98% in 2011-2012; ◦ Global History from 75% in 2010-2011 to 76% in 2011-2012; ◦ Earth Science from 66% in 2010-2011 to 73% in 2011-2012; ◦ Chemistry from 72% in 2010-2011 to 73% in 2011-2012; and ◦ Physics from 44% in 2010-2011 to 79% in 2011-2012. 15

 Increased percentage of students who met the Regents standards at a mastery level (scoring at 85% or above) in ◦ ELA from 48% in 2010-2011 to 54% in 2011-2012; ◦ Integrated Algebra from 10% in 2010-2011 to 17% in 2011- 2012; ◦ Geometry from 0% in 2010-2011 to 30% in 2011-2012; ◦ Global from 25% in 2010-2011 to 42% in 2011-2012; ◦ Earth Science from 20% in 2010-2011 to 30% in 2011-2012; and ◦ Physics from 11% in 2010-2011 to 39% in 2011-2012. 16

6-12 Teachers K-5 ELA  Literary and Written  Critical Analysis and Expression Evaluation  Constructing and Conveying K-5 Math Meaning from text or other  Measurement and problem representations of solving skills information Thomas J. Connor Elementary School WCCS Middle/High School 17

 Administer and analyze formative assessments to measure ongoing student progress at grade levels and in content areas.  Provide research based interventions to students in need.  Engage in professional development focused on Effective Teaching Practices. 18

3-8 ELA 19

Wheatland-Chili Central School District 2011-2012 NYSTP ELA Assessment - Grade 3 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level 100% 100% 83% 80% 87% 80% 79% 60% 73% 59% 40% 67% 20% 60% 53% 0% Total Levels 3 & 4 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 44% (n=53) (n=43) (n=63) (n=51) 40% 35% 27% 21% 21% 20% 14% 11% 6% 6% 6% 4% 2% 0% 0% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 2008-2009… 2009-2010… 2010-2011… 2011-2012… 20

Wheatland-Chili Central School District 2011-2012 NYSTP ELA Assessment - Grade 4 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level 100% 100% 80% 80% 80% 60% 67% 80% 76% 54% 73% 40% 20% 63% 0% 60% Total Levels 3 & 4 54% 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 (n=50) (n=51) (n=46) (n=61) 41% 40% 30% 18% 20% 14% 8% 6% 5% 4% 4% 2% 2% 0% 0% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 21 (n=50) (n=51) (n=46) (n=61)

Wheatland-Chili Central School District 2011-2012 NYSTP ELA Assessment - Grade 5 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level 100% 100% 80% 82% 60% 80% 63% 62% 61% 40% 68% 20% 60% 0% 60% Total Levels 3 & 4 55% 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 49% (n=66) (n=51) (n=60) (n=59) 40% 31% 31% 30% 20% 17% 14% 14% 8% 8% 6% 6% 2% 2% 0% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 22 (n=66) (n=51) (n=60) (n=59)

Wheatland-Chili Central School District 2011-2012 NYSTP ELA Assessment - Grade 6 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level 100% 100% 94% 80% 85% 60% 80% 54% 51% 51% 40% 20% 0% Total Levels 3 & 4 60% 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 52% (n=55) (n=70) (n=50) (n=53) 51% 49% 43% 40% 34% 32% 20% 14% 14% 9% 6% 5% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 (n=55) (n=70) (n=50) (n=53) 23

24

25

3-8 Math 26

27

Wheatland-Chili Central School District 2011-2012 NYSTP Math Assessment - Grade 4 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level 100% 100% 90% 80% 75% 73% 80% 72% 60% 40% 20% 0% 60% Total Levels 3 & 4 53% 50% 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 48% (n=50) (n=52) (n=46) (n=61) 42% 41% 40% 30% 24% 23% 23% 22% 22% 20% 7% 6% 4% 4% 2% 0% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 28 (n=50) (n=52) (n=46) (n=61)

Wheatland-Chili Central School District 2011-2012 NYSTP Math Assessment - Grade 5 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level 100% 100% 80% 73% 60% 70% 68% 67% 80% 40% 20% 0% 60% Total Levels 3 & 4 52% 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 (n=67) (n=51) (n=60) (n=49) 48% 43% 37% 40% 31% 27% 25% 25% 24% 24% 18% 18% 20% 9% 8% 6% 5% 0% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 (n=67) (n=51) (n=60) (n=49) 29

Wheatland-Chili Central School District 2011-2012 NYSTP Math Assessment - Grade 6 Four Year Profile - Percent by Performance Level 100% 100% 98% 80% 79% 72% 80% 60% 66% 40% 20% 0% 60% Total Levels 3 & 4 53% 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 49% (n=55) (n=70) (n=50) (n=53) 45% 40% 36% 36% 36% 30% 30% 24% 20% 19% 20% 14% 4% 2% 2% 0% 0% Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 30 (n=55) (n=70) (n=50) (n=53)