Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power Engineering Headquarters Campus 1000 Cranberry Woods Drive, Cranberry Township, PA Mark Speicher Senior Thesis 2010 Construction Management April 12, 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power Engineering Headquarters Campus Presentation Outline I. Project Overview II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation V. Conclusions/Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power PROJECT OVERVIEW Engineering Headquarters Campus Presentation Outline Location: Cranberry Township, PA I. Project Overview Occupant: Westinghouse Electric Company Building Type: Office II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment Size: 844,595 square feet III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs Construction Dates: February 2008 – May 2010 Overall Project Cost: $240,000,000 IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation Delivery Method: Design‐Bid‐Build V. Conclusions/Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power PROJECT OVERVIEW Engineering Headquarters Campus Presentation Outline P ROJECT T EAM : I. Project Overview Owner: Wells Reit II II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment Tenant: Westinghouse Electric Company GC/CM: Turner Construction Company III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs Architect: IKM Incorporated IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation Engineer: LLI Engineering V. Conclusions/Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power PROJECT OVERVIEW Engineering Headquarters Campus A RCHITECTURE B UILDING E NCLOSURE � Consists of 3 Buildings � Aluminum curtain wall Presentation Outline I. Project Overview � Primarily office space for over 4,000 engineers � Insulated wall panels � Brick II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment S TRUCTURAL � Polished concrete III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs � Steel framed with concrete slab‐on‐deck floors IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation V. Conclusions/Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power ANALYSIS 1: Energy and Environment Engineering Headquarters Campus Presentation Outline B ACKGROUND � As energy company Westinghouse has opportunity to raise the I. Project Overview standard II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment � Leased property � Wells Reit would benefit from reduced lifecycle cost III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation O BJECTIVE � Identify finishes which could be replaced with “greener” V. Conclusions/Recommendations products VI. Acknowledgements � Reduce the energy usage of the Westinghouse campus Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power ANALYSIS 1: Energy and Environment Engineering Headquarters Campus Tinted Double Pane C URRENT W INDOWS Presentation Outline U‐value 0.57 Shading Coefficient (SC) 0.72 I. Project Overview Solar Heat Gain Factor (SHGF) 0.62 � 1” insulated tempered glass II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment Window Square Wall Square Orientation % of Wall � Large percentage of building envelope Footage Footage III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs North 14367 25902 55% South 6717 18327 37% IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation � Potential for energy savings by implementing higher efficiency East 6717 18327 37% windows West 12547 25902 48% V. Conclusions/Recommendations Northwest 5299 8140 65% Southeast 5896 7599 78% VI. Acknowledgements Total 51542 104196 49% Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power ANALYSIS 1: Energy and Environment Engineering Headquarters Campus Solarban Tinted Double PPG S OLARBAN 80 W INDOWS Presentation Outline 80 (2) Pane U‐value 0.29 0.57 I. Project Overview � Excellent thermal properties Shading Coefficient (SC) 0.28 0.72 Solar Heat Gain Factor (SHGF) 0.24 0.62 II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment � Manufactured locally: United Plate Glass, Butler, PA III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation V. Conclusions/Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power ANALYSIS 1: Energy and Environment Engineering Headquarters Campus Presentation Outline E NERGY A NALYSIS Assumptions: I. Project Overview � U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 2.2 Building Energy Analysis � City = Philadelphia, PA II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment Simulation Tool � Window Sq. Footage = 50,976 sq ft � Floor area = 270,000 sq ft III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs � Calculates hour‐by‐hour energy consumption using hourly IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation climate data V. Conclusions/Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power ANALYSIS 1: Energy and Environment Engineering Headquarters Campus Results: Presentation Outline I. Project Overview Building One=460,000 square feet Total Operating Total Operating Total Total Capital II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment Electricity Gas Electric Cost Gas Cost Operating Cost Cooling HVAC Cost Double Pane Tinted $7,202,912 $136,533 $460,387 $184,158 $644,545 $3,019,108 III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs Solarban 80 (2) $6,672,309 $111,192 $437,041 $150,347 $587,388 $2,642,490 Savings $530,603 $25,341 $23,346 $33,812 $57,158 $376,617 IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation � Total operating cost reduced by 9% V. Conclusions/Recommendations � Total cooling HVAC cost reduced by 12.5% VI. Acknowledgements Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power ANALYSIS 2: Prefabricated Concrete Slabs Engineering Headquarters Campus B ACKGROUND Presentation Outline � Campus constructed on a compressed schedule I. Project Overview � 22 month � 15 month � Slabs on critical path of schedule II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment � Cost of overtime had large impact on overall cost III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation O BJECTIVE � Explore the feasibility of precast concrete V. Conclusions/Recommendations � Cost � Schedule VI. Acknowledgements � Structural Ramifications Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power ANALYSIS 2: Prefabricated Concrete Slabs Engineering Headquarters Campus Presentation Outline C URRENT S LAB ON D ECK S YSTEM I. Project Overview Location Duration Start Date End Date � 2 ½” lightweight concrete on 22 gauge metal deck II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment Slab on Deck‐ Center 35 16‐Jul‐08 2‐Sep‐08 Slab on Deck‐ East 35 13‐Aug‐08 30‐Sep‐08 III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs Schedule: Slab on Deck‐ West 35 1‐Oct‐08 18‐Nov‐08 IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation � Poured in the typical workflow pattern � Bottom to Top: Center � East � West V. Conclusions/Recommendations Total 90 16 Jul 08 18 Nov 08 VI. Acknowledgements Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power ANALYSIS 2: Prefabricated Concrete Slabs Engineering Headquarters Campus Presentation Outline C URRENT S LAB ON D ECK S YSTEM Location Forming Placing WWF Material Total I. Project Overview 1st Floor $476,079 $ 36,641 $ 126,564 $639,284 Cost: II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment 2nd Floor $476,079 $ 36,641 $ 126,564 $639,284 3rd Floor $476,079 $ 36,641 $ 126,564 $639,284 � No actual cost data provided III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs 4th Floor $476,079 $ 36,641 $ 126,564 $639,284 5th Floor $476,079 $ 36,641 $ 126,564 $639,284 � Estimate calculated using RS Means IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation Total $2,380,395 $ 181,192 $ 183,205 $ 632,820 $3,377,612 � Approximate cost = $3,400,000 V. Conclusions/Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Power ANALYSIS 2: Prefabricated Concrete Slabs Engineering Headquarters Campus P REFABRICATED C ONCRETE S LABS Presentation Outline I. Project Overview � Double Tees � Larger widths II. Analysis 1: Energy and Environment � Reduce number by 2/3 over Hollowcore planks III. Analysis 2: Concrete Slabs � Reduce steel IV. Analysis 3: BIM Implementation � Placement V. Conclusions/Recommendations � Typical bay sizes were maintained (24’) VI. Acknowledgements � 12’ wide double tees selected Mark Speicher / Construction Management / Senior Thesis 2010
Recommend
More recommend
