“Understanding the rudiments of Nuclear Power and what it means for our country through Koeberg Power Station. By Extrapolation, what new nuclear plants will mean.“ Sedick Davis (Pr Eng) General Manager: Master Nuclear Specialist (Eskom) April 2017
Agenda Basic operation of a nuclear power plant 1 2 Koeberg Power Station Operational record 3 Koeberg Power Station Engineered Safety Features Costs and Economic Impact 4 Commentary on the optimal energy mix 5 Conclusion 6 2
Basic operation of a nuclear power plant Nuclear power plants are also part of the thermal power generation technology as they use thermal energy to generate electricity. Energy conversion stages in generating electricity from nuclear: > nuclear to heat energy through the fission > heat to kinetic/mechanical energy in the turbines > kinetic to electrical energy in the generator
Nuclear Fuel Cycle – front end Conversion Enrichment Mining Milling Uranium Ore Yellow Cake - U 3 O 8 UF 6 Pelletizing Fabrication Fuel Pellet Fuel Rod Fuel UO 2 Assembly
Nuclear Fuel Cycle – back end 3 categories of solid waste from a nuclear power plant: 1. Low level waste > Typically contaminated materials (e.g. gloves used during maintenance, etc.) > Compacted onto steel drums > Final disposal on a licensed site near Vaalputs in the Northern Cape 2. Intermediate level waste > Highly contaminated process materials (e.g. filters, equipment components, etc.) > Compacted on concrete solid drums > Final disposal on a licensed site near Vaalputs in the Northern Cape 3. High level waste/used nuclear fuel > Kept in storage pools or used fuel casks > Various options for final disposal (conditioned for underground geologically stable disposal; reprocessing/recycling with limited waste generated) > RSA’s used fuel is currently kept at Koeberg power station until a centralised fuel storage facility is built. 5
Comparison for Source of Energy Equivalents 6
Koeberg Power Station - Overview South Africa has one nuclear power station, located about 30 km from Cape Town, owned and operated by Eskom since 1984 2 unit Pressurised Water Reactor design (PWR) generating a total of 1860 MWe (contributing about 4.4 % of total generation mix) Unit 1 commercial operation in 1984, and Unit 2 in 1985; Initial Safety Case design for 40 years, but extendable to 60-80 years International peer reviews every 2-3 years (World Association of Nuclear Operators - WANO) 10-yearly re-assessment against modern safety standards, leading to safety-related modifications and upgrades
Koeberg Power Station Operational record Base load generating plants like Koeberg Power Station which run reliably 24 hours a day, is the gatekeeper to quality of supply and energy self-sufficiency. OPERATIONAL RECORD :- Unit 1 - 454 days (2001) Unit 2 – 485 (2017) On Monday, 29 August 2016 both units have simultaneously been on-line for 261 continuous days operation, which is also a new record. Koeberg Power Station was connected to the national grid on 4 April 1984 (celebration 33 years of operation in 2017). 18 th NOSCAR achieved in 2017. WANO 2 nd Quartile performance in WANO Peer review 2017. Koeberg Operator Training Programmes - the only power plant outside of the US to achieve INPO accreditation for Operator Training Programmes. 8
Koeberg Power Station Engineered Safety Features
Costs and Economic Impact The Western Cape in particular depends on Koeberg Power Station for approximately 50% of its electricity demand. The net current effect to our country is a low cost of production with a very high gearing on the job economy as well as the economy in general. In its 2017, KPMG study, titled “Economic Impact Assessment of Koeberg Power Station” . KPMG underscored employment-creation, contributions to the GDP and providing low cost, clean and reliable energy as vital contributions the power station makes in South Africa. Koeberg Power Station has contributed to job creation, infrastructure development, community development and transformation. The jobs at Koeberg Power station are, inter alia, both the product of an investment in Maths, Science and Technology, but also sustain the continuing development in these areas of study. Koeberg Power Station is run by South Africans from all walks of life, races and socio- economic backgrounds, which creates the desired socio-economic dividend for our country. 10
Costs and Economic Impact 11
Operational Reactors Operational Reactors Nuclear Power Plants in Operation - by country (sources: IAEA website 20/09/2016; International Energy Agency 2016 ) 12
Under Construction Reactors Under Construction Reactors Under Construction Reactors Under Construction Reactors Nuclear Power Plants under Construction – by country ( source IAEA website 20/09/2016) 13
Under Construction Reactors Under Construction Reactors Nuclear Power Plants Global Outlook All of the world’s major economies, except Germany keep the nuclear option open and plants are under construction in France, China, Russia, Abu Dhabi, South Korea, USA and Brazil amongst others. Turkey, Belarus, Poland, Bangladesh amongst others or taking steps to establish nuclear plants. On our continent, the economic giants of Nigeria and Egypt have established policy and structures to do the same. So too Kenya, Morocco, Niger, Ghana. Saudi Arabia is one of the world’s oil giants but also has a strong interest in a nuclear energy powered future. The simple reason is that they, like us, need an energy mix that gives self-sufficiency in a way that is not only affordable, but in fact profitable. In more ways than just producing electricity. 14
Based on the current forecast, country peak demand nearly doubles in 2050 Country peak demand of 37 000 MW in 2016 nearly doubles to 70 000 MW in 2050 15
Based on Eskom modelling there is a significant need for new baseload in South Africa Exiting baseload Available coal-fire baseload until 2050 Comments • South Africa is losing baseload , however Eskom needs to replace at least some of this with baseload capacity again • Based on Eskom modelling there is a significant need for new baseload • In addition, an excessive penetration of renewable energy will contribute to significant operational issues and additional cost • Power Quality criteria requires us to replace with similar flexible base load 16
Impact of Generation Technology on Network Costs (excluding the actual generation charge) Finland, France, Germany, S Korea, UK & USA
Conclusion Governments of most major and emerging economies have or want Nuclear Energy because it strengthens base load generation and is profitable. All protagonists aim for an optimal mix that co-exists with continued growth and development in renewable forms of energy. No credible engineering argument could rely on a supply system without reliable base load and dispatchable capability. In future generations this is conceivable as storage and smart grids become feasible. Currently the technology is not matured enough or sufficiently cost effective to displace other forms of baseload. The South African nuclear experience is a positive one of safe, clean, reliable and affordable generation. The broader economic impact of nuclear in developing quality jobs, supporting the economy and developing skills in Mathematics, Science and Technology is substantial. 18
Recommend
More recommend
