Transformation of Aspirational Districts Towards An Evidence Based - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transformation of Aspirational Districts Towards An Evidence Based Governance December 5, 2018 1

Indian Economy: High Growth but severe development Challenges 2

Why this programme? India on high growth trajectory. • But Low Human Development Index: R anked 130 of 188 • nations in 2018 Significant variations: Inter-State, inter-district. • Aspirational District Programme launched to transform • pockets of under-development. Special focus on health, nutrition, education, agriculture needed for sabka saath sabka vikaash. 3

Why this programme? These under-developed pockets need rapid • transformation: - To maintain high trajectory of growth. - To keep the growth inclusive - To meet the SDGs. - To improve economic productivity and ease of living of citizens living in decades of under-development. 4

Nutrition: Current Status: Not consistent with India’s growth process. • Improving nutrition is key task. • Special mission to improve nutrition launched . However, challenges are huge: • One in every 2 women is anaemic • One in every 3 children is stunted • One in every 4 children is Malnourished • One in every 5 children is Wasted Poor nutrition: especially in first 6 months has serious effect. 5

Nutrition: High prevalence of stunting Nutrition: High prevalence of stunting Stunting Best performance (% of children below 5 years) Kerala 19.7 Below 25% Goa 20.1 25-35% Above 35% Tripura 24.3 Bottom 3 States Meghalaya 43.8 Jharkhand 45.3 Bihar 48.3 Source: NFHS-4, 2015-16 6

Nutrition: High prevalence of malnourishment Underweight children Best performance (% of children below 5 years) Mizoram 11.9 Below 25% Manipur 13.8 25-35% Above 35% Sikkim 14.2 Bottom 3 States Madhya Pradesh 42.8 Bihar 43.9 Jharkhand 47.8 Source: NFHS-4, 2015-16 7

Health: Infant Mortality Infant Mortality Rate (/1000 live births) Best Performance Top third (6-28) A&N Islands 10 Middle third (29-35) Bottom third (40-64) Goa 13 Data NA Kerala 15 Bottom 3 States Assam 48 Bihar 48 Chhattisgarh 54 UP 64 8 Source: NFHS4, 2015 (IMR)

Health- Maternal Mortality Maternal Mortality Ratio (/100,000 live births) Best Performance Top third (61-113) Kerala 61 Middle third (127-222) Bottom third (244-300) Maharashtra 68 Data NA Tamil Nadu 79 Bottom 3 States Assam 300 UP/Uttarakhand 285 Rajasthan 244 9 Source: SRS 2011-2013

Health: Number of doctors Doctor density Best Performance /1,000 population Goa 2.20 ≥1 Karnataka 1.66 0.4-1 <0.4 Punjab 1.51 Bottom 3 States Haryana 0.23 Chhattisgarh 0.22 Jharkhand 0.13 10 Source: NHP 2016

Health: Total bed density Total bed density /1,000 population Best Performance Goa 4.39 >=2 Sikkim 4.19 1.5-2 <1.5 Himachal Pradesh 2.96 Bottom 3 States UP 0.62 Jharkhand 0.59 Bihar 0.24 11 Source: NHP 2016

India is improving but there is huge state and district wise variations. % Change in Stunting among Children under 5 Years Rates of improvement is slow. The map shows improvement in reduction in per cent of malnourished children in 10 years, ie. between NHFS-3 (2005-06) and NHFS 4 ( 2015-16). all States improved but huge inter-state variations All States improved but huge inter-state variations Note: Darker the shades, better the improvement. 12 Source: NFHS 3- NFHS 4

ASER Learning Outcomes: 2016 ASER 2016 Jammu & Kashmir Himachal Pradesh Punjab Uttarakhand Per cent of government Arunachal Pradesh Haryana Delhi school children in Std V Sikkim Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh Assam Nagaland who can read Std II level Bihar Meghalaya Manipur text Tripura Jharkhand West Bengal Madhya Pradesh Gujarat Mizoram Chhattisgarh Orissa Maharashtra Telangana 0-30 Andhra Pradesh Karnataka 31-40 41-50 Tamil Nadu 51-60 Kerala 61-75 13

Education: Class III NAS Score, 2017 Overall Average (Three Sub) Best Performance (National Average score = 64.76) Karnataka 75.66 67.3% -75.6% 58.6% - 66.7% Andhra 75.33 49% - 58% Rajasthan 74 Bottom 3 States Lakshadweep 56 Delhi 55.66 Arunachal 49.33 Average Score Boys = 64.45 Girls = 65.09% Total Students Appeared 6,20,499 14

Education: Class VIII NAS Score, 2017 Overall Average (Four Sub) Best Performance (National Average score = 44.61) Rajasthan 62.3 53% -62.3% Jharkhand 54.8 44.25% - 52% 34.25% - 43.25% Karnataka 54.5 Bottom 3 States Arunachal 36.75 Lakshadweep 36 Puducherry 34.25 Average Score Boys = 44.2% Girls = 44.96% Total Students Appeared 7,23,738 15

Education Facilities available for children % Schools with computers available for Students, %, 2016 Best Performance Kerala 89 Top (30% above) Gujarat 75.2 Middle (10-30%) Bottom (10% below%) Tamil Nadu 57.3 Bottom 3 States Assam 1.2 Chhattisgarh 1.5 Meghalaya 1.7 Source: ASER 2016 16

115 Districts 112 Aspirational Districts programme launched in Jan 2018. NITI Aayog Central Ministry • Currently implemented in 112 districts in 27 MHA LWE States.

Strategy FOCUSED APPROACH Monitoring Focus Areas Implementation • Health & Nutrition • Education • Mass movement • 49 indicators . • Agriculture + Water • Team of Centre + States • Ranking resources + District. • Financial Inclusion +skill • Basic: Infrastructure 18 District aspires to become State’s best and then nation’s best.

Strategy Empowered Prabhari officers: Team creation Committee to solve Centre + State problems. Real time Monitoring Ranking of districts Validation of data based on data on delta Draw District Vision Converge Identify low hanging & Plan Schemes fruit. Tata Trusts and Gates Foundation ( ID Insight) are undertaking household survey 19

Strategy: 49 well defined indicators, ranking and competition Dashboard is 49 indicators Base line ranking capturing progress identified released. on real time basis Sectors Weight Health and Nutrition 30% Education 30% Niti Aayog announced latest ranking on Agriculture and Irrigation 20% progress ( delta) recently Financial inclusion and skill 10% formation Basic Infrastructure 10% 20

These in indic icators have been expla lained to o dis istric ict teams at t bloc lock le level l :

Niti Aayog has explained the strategy and best practices to districts and other stakeholders. This is the book released by the Hon’ble PM on April 21, 2018.

Strategy: Districts to aspire to become best in State and then in India. • Comparison with States best and nation’s best. Competitive spirit holds the key of transformation.

Districts to aspire: State’s best to Nation’s best : Status in march 2018 Proportion of Institutional Deliveries % children age 12-23 months fully Sahebganj, District 48.2% immunized 62.24% Jharkhand State’s best - 81.7% (Purbi State’s best - 76% (Dumka) Singhbhum) Health & India’s best – 97.82% (Faridkot, India’s Best – 100% (in 18 districts of Nutrition Punjab) States) Rural electrification Education Drop out Rate at Elementary Level Per cent unelectrified households 11.7% 50% State’s best - 2.6% (Bokaro) State’s best 36% (Latehar) India’s Best – 0 % (in 89 districts All India Best – 0 % (in 124 districts in India) in India)

It helped districts in making focussed effort: Status in October 2018 Proportion of Institutional % children age 9-11 months fully Deliveries immunized 62.24% 87.79% 48.2% 76.01% Sahebganj District, Jharkhand % of Schools with Electricity Facility at % of Electrified Households Secondary Level 50% Nearing 100% 55.34% 63.11%

Performance sin ince March 2018- Majo jor in indic icators In last 5 months, performance of districts, as reported by • districts have been analysed.

Progress: Major in indic icators Indicator: Percentage of women registered for ANC within 1 st trimester August 31, 2018 March 31, 2018 As on As on District March 31, August 31 Change 2018 2018 Less than 60% Less than 60% Vidisha 62 90 28 36 Districts 23 Districts 13 Districts Rajgarh 62 89 27 60% to 80% 60% to 80% Shrawasti 35 60 25 37 Districts 44 Districts Lohardaga 51 77 25 8 Districts More than 80% More than 80% Bahraich 33 58 25 39 Districts 45 Districts

Progress: Major in indic icators Indicator: Percentage of fully immunized children (9 – 11 months) August 31, 2018 March 31, 2018 As on As on March District August 31 Change 31, 2018 2018 Less than 60% Less than 60% Mewat 30 88 58 8 Districts 2 Districts 6 Districts Ribhoi 45 94 49 60% to 80% 60% to 80% Ranchi 64 97 33 20 Districts 3 Districts Siddharthnagar 69 98 29 17 Districts More than 80% More than 80% Purnia 74 100 25 84 Districts 107 Districts

Progress: Major in indic icators Indicator: Percentage of Institutional Delivery August 31, 2018 March 31, 2018 As on As on District March 31, August 31 Change 2018 2018 Less than 60% Less than 60% Kupwara 53 98 45 32 Districts 25 Districts 7 Districts Chandel 13 55 43 60% to 80% 60% to 80% Baran 55 93 38 40 Districts 43 Districts Mewat 51 87 36 3 Districts More than 80% More than 80% Rajgarh 47 83 36 40 Districts 44 Districts