aspirational goal 1 part 2
play

Aspirational Goal 1 (Part 2) Acceler Accelerated Ac ed Achie - PDF document

Aspirational Goal 1 (Part 2) Acceler Accelerated Ac ed Achie hievement an ement and Equ d Equity ( ty (AAE) AE) Cur Curriculum, I iculum, Instr struction & ction & Inno novation (CII) tion (CII) Sc School Administr hool


  1. Aspirational Goal 1 (Part 2) Acceler Accelerated Ac ed Achie hievement an ement and Equ d Equity ( ty (AAE) AE) Cur Curriculum, I iculum, Instr struction & ction & Inno novation (CII) tion (CII) Sc School Administr hool Administration and Leader tion and Leadership (SAL) ship (SAL) Sy Syst stem A em Accounta ountability & bility & Sc School I hool Impr provement ( ement (SASI) I) October 24, 2018 Presenter(s): - Jamie Aliveto, Director, SASI - Andrea Maruskin, Monocacy Middle School - Kevin Cuppett, Executive Director, CII - Kathleen Schlappal, Director, SAL - Becky Hunter, Brunswick High School - Diana Sung, Coordinator, SAL - Meg Lee, Supervisor, AAE Academics, Communications, Technology and Student Achievement A SPIRATIONAL G OAL 1: FCPS will equip each and every student to be an empowered learner and an engaged citizen to achieve a positive impact in the local and global community. • Priority 1 —FCPS will provide each and every student • Priority 1 —FCPS will provide each and every student high quality instruction that fosters inquiry, creative high quality instruction that fosters inquiry, creative thinking, complex problem solving, and collaboration. thinking, complex problem solving, and collaboration. • Priority 2 —FCPS will raise achievement for all • Priority 2 —FCPS will raise achievement for all students and eliminate achievement gaps. students and eliminate achievement gaps. 1

  2. Goal 1 Measures • Perceptual data related to high-quality instruction • College and career readiness measures • Access to advanced coursework • Local assessment measures • State accountability data presented to BOE on October 10 High-Quality Instruction Student Perceptual Survey Results 2

  3. P1, Measurable Goal 1—Classroom Rigor (Grades 3-5) By 2020, student survey responses indicating a positive experience will increase to ≥ 80% in the following areas. G RADE 3-5 S TUDENTS - % F AVORABILITY M EASURES 2016 * 2018 2017 * (B ASELINE ) % * 3-Y R . T REND T ARGET M ET Engagement in Classes 63% 63% 60% ▼ High Expectations in Classes 78% 80% 79% ▬ Opportunities to Collaborate in Classes 48% 45% 47% ▬ Opportunities to Use Problem Solving in 74% 75% 74% ▬ Classes Opportunities to Demonstrate Creativity 57% 54% 51% ▼ in Classes Feel Adequately Prepared for the Next 85% 87% 86% ▬ ● Step in Their Education Program 3-Year Trend Key: ▲ >1% increase ▼ >1% decrease Target Met Key: ▬ No change or increase/decrease ≤ 1% ● Met Target of ≥ 80% in 2018 P1, Measurable Goal 1—Classroom Rigor (Grades 6-12) By 2020, student survey responses indicating a positive experience will increase to ≥ 80% in the following areas. G RADE 6-12 S TUDENTS - % F AVORABILITY M EASURES 2018 2016 * 2017 * (B ASELINE ) % * 3-Y R . T REND T ARGET M ET 40% 40% 37% ▼ Engagement in Classes MS=42%; HS=38% MS=39%; HS=41% MS=38%; HS=36% ▼ / ▼ 65% 65% 61% ▼ High Expectations in Classes MS=70%; HS=61% MS=68%; HS=62% MS=66%; HS%=57% ▼ / ▼ 38% 42% 38% Opportunities to Collaborate in ▬ Classes MS=34%; HS=41% MS=36%; HS=46% MS=33%; HS=42% ▬ / ▬ Opportunities to Use Problem 65% 66% 67% ▲ Solving in Classes MS=66%; HS=64% MS=65%; HS=68% MS=66%; HS=67% ▬ / ▲ Opportunities to Demonstrate 52% 44% 38% ▼ Creativity in Classes MS=54%; HS=50% MS=45%; HS=42% MS=41%; HS=36% ▼ / ▼ Feel Adequately Prepared for the 70% 68% 65% ▼ Next Step in Their Education MS=76%; HS=65% MS=70%; HS=66% MS=68%; HS=61% ▼ / ▼ Program 3-Year Trend Key: ▲ >1% increase ▼ >1% decrease Target Met Key: ▬ No change or increase/decrease ≤ 1% ● Met Target of ≥ 80% in 2018 3

  4. College and Career Readiness Seniors’ Performance on CCR Measures P1, Measurable Goal 2—CCR ELA By 2020, 95% of high school seniors will meet or exceed standards for career/college readiness as determined by two or more of the following measures. College and Career ELA—2016-2018 (Seniors) 2016 (n=2,954) 2017 (n=2,971) 2018 (n=3,135) CCR ELA Indicators n % n % n % ACT ELA (21+) 354 12 264 9 193 6 AP English 333 11 295 10 379 12 Accuplacer ELA 713 24 791 27 641 20 Dual Enrollment ELA ^ ^ 959 32 982 31 PARCC English 10 (Levels 4-5) 49 ≤ 2 1,485 50 1,730 55 PARCC English 11 (Levels 4-5) 28 ≤ 1 838 28 291 9 SAT Reading* 1,175 40 1,561 53 1,738 55 CCR ELA Status 1,560 53 2,073 70 2,271 72 ^ Dual enrollment by content area is not available for 2016; this level of tracking began in 2017. * SAT CCR cut scores were 500+ for 2016 and changed to 530+ for 2017 and 2018. Receipt of SAT scores are ongoing throughout the school year; thus, these reported numbers are subject to change. Additional Notes: Data excludes Rock Creek. IB data were not available for this reporting. 4

  5. P1, Measurable Goal 2—CCR Math By 2020, 95% of high school seniors will meet or exceed standards for career/college readiness as determined by two or more of the following measures. College and Career Math—2016-2018 (Seniors) 2016 (n=2,954) 2017 (n=2,971) 2018 (n=3,135) CCR Math Indicators n % n % n % ACT Math (21+) 578 20 500 17 482 15 AP Math 564 19 550 19 525 17 Accuplacer Math 124 4 176 6 172 6 Dual Enrollment Math ^ 298 10 493 16 ^ PARCC Algebra 2 (Levels 4-5) 67 ≤ 2 481 16 1,133 36 SAT Math 1,231 42 1,564 53 1,416 45 CCR Math Status 1,350 46 1,704 57 1,659 53 ^ Dual enrollment by content area is not available for 2016; this level of tracking began in 2017. * SAT CCR cut scores were 500+ for 2016 and changed to 530+ for 2017 and 2018. Receipt of SAT scores are ongoing throughout the school year; thus, these reported numbers are subject to change. Additional Notes: Data excludes Rock Creek. IB data were not available for this reporting. P1, Measurable Goal 2—Seniors Meeting Criteria By 2020, 95% of high school seniors will meet or exceed standards for career/college readiness as determined by two or more of the following measures: GP A 2.5+, industry licensure, dual enrollment, ACT/SA T/IB/AP assessments, or performance on accountability assessments. College and Career—2016-2018 Number of Seniors: 2016 = 2,954; 2017 = 2,971; 2018 = 3,135 Seniors Meeting/Exceeding ELA Math Class CCR Standards* n % n % 2016 2,606 88% 2,595 88% In One or More Criteria 2017 2,627 88% 2,593 87% 2018 2729 87% 2,671 85% 2016 1,828 62% 1,798 61% In Two or More Criteria 2017 2,142 72% 1,954 66% 2018 2,170 69% 1,912 61% * Not every student in the graduating classes took a PARCC assessment. * Includes weighted GPA of 2.5 or higher. 5

  6. P1, Measurable Goal 2—CCR Indicators By 2020, 95% of high school seniors will meet or exceed standards for career/college readiness as determined by two or more of the following measures. College and Career—2016-2018 Number of Seniors: 2016 = 2,954; 2017 = 2,971; 2018 = 3,135 2016 Seniors 2017 Seniors 2018 Seniors CCR Indicators n % n % n % Industry Licensure 618 21% 638 22% 579 19% Weighted GPA ≥ 2,491 84% 2,482 84% 2,583 82% 2.5 Dual Enrollment 863 29% 1,062 36% 1,101 35% P1, Measurable Goal 3—Post-Graduation By 2021, 95% of high school graduates will be successfully employed or enrolled in a post-secondary school or college. Employment Employment data are no longer available for reporting. Data (lagged) was previously obtained from MSDE. MSDE no longer receives student-level data; it only receives aggregate state data from the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation (DLLR) for federal reporting purposes. Post-Secondary Education Class of 2014 Class of 2015 Class of 2016 Post-Secondary (n=2,956) (n=2,908) (n=2,851) Education Enrolled in higher education 1,996 (68%) 2,309 (79%) 2,149 (75%) (at least one term) 6

  7. Access to Advanced Coursework Magnet Program (Grades 3-5) Highly Able Learner Program (Grades 6-8) AP/IB/Dual Enrollment (Grades 9-12) P2, Measurable Goal 1—Magnet Program By 2020, the percent of students enrolled in HAL/Magnet programs/AP/IB/Honors /Dual Enrollment courses will mirror the demographic percentages of the county . Magnet Program (Grades 3-5) Enrollment*—2016-2018 % of Total Students % Student Population Enrolled in Magnet (Sept. 30, Grades 3-5) Student Group SY2016 SY2017 SY2018 SY2019^ 2016 2017 2018 2019^ (n=222) (n=220) (n=175) (n=220) American Indian ** ** ** ** ≤ 1 ≤ 1 ≤ 1 ≤ 1 Asian 26 25 20 17 6 6 5 6 Black/African American 9 8 9 11 12 12 13 13 Hispanic/Latino 4 5 6 8 15 16 17 18 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander ** ** ** ** ≤ 1 ≤ 1 ≤ 1 ≤ 1 White 52 52 56 58 62 61 59 58 Multiple Races 9 10 9 6 5 5 5 6 English Learners ** ** ** ** 5 5 7 8 Free/Reduced Meals 9 9 7 10 29 30 29 31 Special Education ** ** ** ** 10 10 11 11 * Based on September 30 enrollment. ** Fewer than 10 students in group. ^ Data are not finalized and are subject to change based on final reporting. 7

Recommend


More recommend