Proposed District Plan Chapters 23 Subdivision & 24 Financial - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Proposed District Plan Chapter’s 23 Subdivision & 24 Financial Contributions 19 th , 20 th and 21 st of November Paula Rolfe

Introduction • Subdivision is essentially the process of dividing a parcel of land or a building into one or more further parcels, or changing an existing boundary location • Subdivision by itself is not a use of land, however it often sets the platform for future development and land use

Summary of Submissions • Forty-nine submissions with 145 points of submission • Twenty further submissions with 71 further submission points have been received in relation to principal submissions

Key Issues • Objectives and Policies – Shall vs Should • Subdivision Design Standards – General Residential Zone – Comprehensive Residential Development – Amendments to 23.7.3, 23.7.4 and 23.7.5 • Activity Status – Controlled vs Restricted Discretionary

Objectives & Policies Shall versus Should • Minor amendments with retention of objectives & policies • An additional policy added for reverse sensitivity mitigation from some transport corridors see 23.2.1a v • Shall deleted in most instances & replaced with minor wording amendments, but retained for 23.2.4a ii

Background – Design Standards • Aerial shot of Rototuna Cul De Sacs

Achieving functional, safe and attractive environments Higher density housing internally clustered, serviced by private driveways and with little amenity Public open spaces at edges of development, not relating well to lots and not a good shape to provide amenity values Many lots served by cul-de-sacs and/or private accessways – lack of “sense of street” and poor permeability

Achieving functional, safe and attractive environments • Open Spaces should provide a central feature and focus for development • Open spaces should adjoin main roads • Medium density housing should be With Design located near areas of public open space Guidance • Cul-de-sacs and rear lots should be avoided where possible

Subdivision Design Standards General Residential • Minimum lot sizes by design, or reduce from 400m2 to 375m2 or 350m2 • PDP achieves density requirements under the PRPS, Future Proof & Strategic Framework • Further work required by Council to identify infrastructure capacity

Subdivision Design Standards Comprehensive Residential Development • Reintroduce CRD’s within residential zone & provide for within subdivision at 300m2 • It is not proposed to include these as: – Higher residential densities encouraged – Housing typologies clearly set out – Detached dwellings, 2 nd dwellings & duplexes RDA – Duplexes encourage more compact development – Landuse & infrastructure integrated

Housing Typologies Duplexes Apartments

Subdivision Design Standards Rules 23.7.3, 23.7.4 & 23.7.5 • Private way widths, lengths, & lots being served from various widths submitted on • A review in relation to NZS4404 Land & Infrastructure undertaken • Design guides identify cul-de-sacs avoided where possible, otherwise be straight & short, provide pedestrian & cycle links to streets & open spaces & avoid private ways off them

Subdivision Design Standards Rules 23.7.3, 23.7.4 & 23.7.5 cont’d • Boundary lengths, private ways, pedestrian ways & cul-de-sacs have been requested to be retained, opposed or amended • Boundary lengths support transport network • 40m accepted for large lot residential

Restricted Discretionary v Controlled • PDP has an urban design-led approach • Restricted discretionary provides for flexibility and always remains a restricted discretionary where standards are not met • Recommendation for non-notification to provide greater certainty

Other Issues • Leasehold subdivision • Sub # 1032.014 – Rototuna Holdings Ltd

Proposed District Plan Chapter 24 Financial Contributions

Introduction • May be imposed to promote sustainable management of natural & physical resources • Required to recoup proportional costs of infrastructure &/or to offset adverse effects of development

Summary of Submissions • Eighteen submissions with 34 points of submission • Ten submissions with 11 further submission points have been received in relation to principal submissions

Key Issues • Development Contributions (dc’s) versus Financial Contributions (fc’s) • Ecological restoration • Development Agreements • Reserves Levels of service

Development Contributions versus Financial Contributions • Consistency & clarity is sought between dc’s & fc’s • Clarity already provided for in the purpose (24.1e)iv), and policy 24.2.1a) and rules 24.3.2b, and rule 24.3.3 • Recommended that further explanation be added under the objective and policies

Ecological Restoration • Policy requested to provide for fc’s to be taken for river & gully system ecological restoration • Can be provided subject to Newbury Principles • Recommended policy 24.2.1b iii & rule 24.3.3d) Offset Effects be reworded to provide for river & gully restoration

Development Agreements • Request to include for significant developments • Council enables development ahead of its programme of works & will require a development agreement to ensure infrastructure is provided • Recognised within Growth Funding Policy & Development Contributions Policy • Recommended to include in ‘explanation’ of objective & policies

Reserves Levels of Service (Rule 24.4.1) • Request a reserve los for passive activities from 4ha to 10 ha per 1000 population • A minimum of 4ha is required • A change to 10ha would require a large commitment & likely to be financially unsustainable • Private property will contribute to 10% indigenous cover

Questions ?

Rule 23.7.3 General Residential Zone and all Special Residential Zones d) Maximum number of allotments served by a single private way 5 6 e) Minimum private way width serving 1-4 3 allotments 3.5m 3.6m f) Minimum private way width serving 5 6 allotments 6.5m 4.5m h) Maximum private way length 50m i) Maximum cul-de-sac length 75m150m

Rule 23.7.4 Large Lot Residential Zone a) Minimum transport corridor boundary length for a front site 40m 40m c) Maximum number of allotments served by a single private way 6 d) Minimum private way width serving 1-3 allotments 3.6m e) Minimum private way width serving 6 allotments 4.5m g) Maximum private way length 100m with passing every 50m h) Maximum cul-de-sac length 0

Rule 23.7.5 Both 23.7.5g) and h) are to be deleted • g) Minimum private way width serving more than 5 allotments 17m • h) Minimum private way width that serves multiple allotments with an overall total net site area greater than 5000m2 17m

Electricity Transmission Corridors

Subdivision Design Standards

Subdivision Design Standards

Rototuna – V12 Appeal

Subdivision Design Standards

Subdivision Design Standards Housing Typologies

Subdivision Design Standards Housing Typologies