port lands flood protection stakeholder advisory
play

Port Lands Flood Protection Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Port Lands Flood Protection Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #3 August 21, 2018 What are we building? 4 Earthworks/Flood Protection 5 Bridges and Structures Roads and Municipal Services 7 Parks 8 Where are we now? Where are we now?


  1. Port Lands Flood Protection Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #3 August 21, 2018

  2. What are we building? 4

  3. Earthworks/Flood Protection 5

  4. Bridges and Structures

  5. Roads and Municipal Services 7

  6. Parks 8

  7. Where are we now? Where are we now? 9

  8. Where are we now? Feb 2018 July 2018 Spring 2019 Port Lands Flood Protection (PLFP) PLFP community Design for parks & river Community consultation #2 is 60% complete consultation #1 Fall 2018 Fall 2019 May 2018 River excavation begins Design for Design river, parks, Design for parks & river is Commissioners Street is roads & bridges is 30% 50% complete complete complete Design complete on Cherry Street & Cherry Street Bridge North

  9. Key Design Milestones Fall 2018 River excavation begins Fall 2019 May 2018 Design for parks & river Design river, parks, is 50% complete Design for Commissioners roads & bridges is 30% Street is complete Design complete on complete Cherry Street & Cherry Street Bridge North August 2018 Spring 2019 Design for roads is 60% Design for parks is 60% complete complete Design for river is 90% complete

  10. Construction Progress 13

  11. 14

  12. 15

  13. 16

  14. Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure Where are we now? Roads and Municipal Infrastructure SAC # 3 August 21, 2018 Prepared by WSP with files from DTAH 54

  15. Where are we now? Network of Streets 55

  16. Where are we now? Design Vision 57

  17. Where are we now? Design Approval Schedule 59

  18. Where are we now? Cherry Street Cross Section 61

  19. Where are we now? Public Realm 64

  20. Public Realm Concept for New Cherry Street

  21. Where are we now? Community Consultation #2 Feedback on Cycle Tracks 67

  22. Separation of cyclists from traffic • Physical barrier seen as most important • Higher barriers (e.g. planters) prioritized, followed by curbs/medians and lastly elevation • People noted it's important that high planters don’t obstruct visibility Separation of cyclists from pedestrians • Physical barrier preferred • Consider wheelchair access if using curbs or planters • People are open to alternatives in the event of space and cost constraints • Combination of visual cues (texture, colour, signage) preferred to account for weather and different user needs • Pavement markers – would like both separating lines and markers • Consider maintenance/longevity 68

  23. Regulating speed within cycling zones • People recommend separating slow and fast cyclists Transition zones • People noted that textured surfaces should be limited on cycling paths • People asked for cues that are consistent with treatments elsewhere in the city • Colour is preferred over texture, though many people note that neither is clear enough in the precedent images shown 69

  24. Where are we now? Cherry Street Design 70

  25. Cherry Street from Lake Shore to Keating Channel

  26. Cherry Street from Keating Channel to Commissioners Street

  27. Cherry Street from Commissioners to Polson Street

  28. Where are we now? Intersection of Cherry and Commissioners Streets 74

  29. Intersection: Cherry Street and Commissioners Street

  30. Where are we now? Cherry Street Rail Underpass 76

  31. Where are we now? Potential Innovations 78

  32. Questions for Consideration #1 - Do you feel the proposed design preserves the important aspects of the heritage building or structures in the project area? What aspects do you feel are most important to preserve? #2 - Do you feel the current design for Cherry Street addresses your previous request to consider the clear delineation of space? Is there any user group (pedestrian, cyclist, transit rider, driver) you feel is not well served by the current design? Why? 81

Recommend


More recommend