por ort o t of vanco ancouv uver er
play

Por ort o t of Vanco ancouv uver er BNSF BNSF Railw Railway - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feb 25, 2023 •230 likes •403 views

Por ort o t of Vanco ancouv uver er BNSF BNSF Railw Railway ay Hazar Hazardo dous us Ma Mate terial rial Tran ansp spor orta tation tion Pr Prep epar ared edne ness ss an and d Res espo pons nse Jun une e 4 th

  1. Por ort o t of Vanco ancouv uver er BNSF BNSF Railw Railway ay – Hazar Hazardo dous us Ma Mate terial rial Tran ansp spor orta tation tion Pr Prep epar ared edne ness ss an and d Res espo pons nse Jun une e 4 th th , , 20 2013 13 6/11/2013 1

  2. Haz Hazar ardous dous Ma Mater terials ials • For US Railroads Hazardous Materials Account for:  5% of total U.S. freight rail carloads  5% of tonnage  6% of ton-miles • 68% of rail hazmat travels in tank cars • 28% on intermodal flat cars; the remainder in covered hoppers, gondolas, and other car types • The most potentially hazardous materials, termed toxic inhalation hazards (TIH) are nearly all transported in tank cars. TIH materials constitutes only about 0.3 % of all rail carloads. In 2012 TIH shipment declined about 15% as safer alternatives are developed and transported. 2

  3. Hazar Hazardo dous us Ma Mate terials rials Tran ansp spor ort As common carriers, railroads are required under federal law to move hazardous materials Serious Incidents Rail and Truck (1989-2006) 500 Virtually all are shipped without  450 400 incident (99.998%) 350 300 Hazmat accident rates have Truck 250  200 Railroad declined by 90% since 1980 and 150 100 nearly 50% since 1990 50 0 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 Moving hazardous materials by  Hazardous Materials Fatalities in Rail Incidents (1989-2006) rail is 16 times safer than moving 10 9 them on the roads 8 7 Chlorine 6 Ammonia Railroads incurred 17 fatalities  LPG 5 Ethanol since 1989 while trucks average 4 3 nearly 11 annually. BNSF had 2 1 none. 0 1998 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 3

  4. BNSF BNSF Haz Hazar ardous dous Ma Mater terials ials Transp anspor orta tation tion Number of Shipments Total Releases 1,600,000 250 1,400,000 221 216 200 195 1,200,000 172165 169 144162 1,000,000 150 135 800,000 112 10510511092 105 100 96 99 80 600,000 50 400,000 10 23 10 16 17 17 17 14 9 17 21 12 12 15 10 15 15 8 0 200,000 5 7 9 1 3 5 7 9 1 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Non-Accident Accident Trend Examples of Types of Releases Any identifiable release is reportable under DOT regulations Non-Accident Release Accident Release 4

  5. BNSF BNSF Was ashing hingto ton n Sta State te Cr Crud ude e Oil Oil Tran ansp spor orta tatio tion • Currently for BNSF, US “Crude by Rail” consists of mainly transportation from various Shale oil sources (i.e Bakken, Eagle Ford, Permian Basin etc). • In 2012 - 3,632 shipments of petroleum crude oil (PCO) came to WA State BNSF Crude Oil Transport • In Q1 2013 – over 3,700 of Year LDD SHPMTS RESIDUE SHPMTS TOTAL SHPMTS PCO came into WA State 2011 38,312 39,514 77,826 2012 152,926 162,678 315,604 % Change 299.16% 311.70% 305.53% 5

  6. Lo Low Pr w Pres essu sure e Tan ank k Ca Car r – DO DOT T 11 111A 1A10 100W 0W1 Top Fittings Bottom Outlet 6

  7. Pr Prepar eparedness: edness: Community Community Training aining Community focus is on training responders and providing interpretative information. Training is available via instructor lead or computer based training. Number of Responders Trained Training topics include: • Train list / shipping papers • Placards • Equipment • Incident Assessment • Hands-on equipment in field – Instructor lead • Commodity Flow Study 7

  8. Eme Emerge genc ncy y Pr Prep epar ared edne ness ss an and d Plan Plannin ning System Emergency Response Plan • Identifies how BNSF responds to incidents throughout our system • Includes:  LRP’s (Local Reaction Plans)  LERP’s (Local Emergency Response Plans)  Notification Procedures  Outlines Roles and Responsibilities 6/11/2013 8

  9. Geo Geograph phical ical Res espo pons nse e Plan Plan Sup Suppo port/De t/Develop elopmen ment t – Wate ter r Res espo pons nse Public Plans • Northwest (w/ additional quick access reference documents) • Coastal • Mississippi River • Working w/ EPA + others on Plans in ND, MT, WY Rail Specific • Kootenai River (MT) • Columbia River CCP’s • Colorado River (CO) • Wind River (WY) • Middlefork Flathead/Glacier Park – In development (MT) 6/11/2013 9

  10. BNSF BNSF Compan Company y Contr Control ol Points oints 10

  11. NIMS NIMS Inc Incide ident nt Co Comma mmand nd Sy Syst stem em • BNSF Railway will initiate, manage and maintain a rapid, aggressive, well coordinated, and effective response • BNSF hazardous material responders, contractors, operations supervisors and train crews will work within the Unified Incident Command Structure 11

  12. Response: esponse: Haz Hazma mat GIS t GIS 12

  13. Vancouver February 2013 Seattle Whitefish Portland Minot Fargo Superior Mandan Billings Hettinger Minneapolis/ St. Paul Gillette Klamath Falls La Crosse Bridger Jct Alliance Sioux City Chicago Ravenna Salt Lake City Galesburg Lincoln McCook Stockton Denver Superior Machens St. Louis Kansas City La Junta Arkansas Springfield Bakersfield Avard City Mojave Needles Texline Los Angeles Tulsa San Bernardino Oklahoma Norris Memphis City Belen Amarillo Phoenix Texico Birmingham Haslet Ft. Worth Sweetwater El Paso Teague Temple Spring New Orleans Houston BNSF HAZMAT Responder Locations 220+ Responders at 60 Locations 13

  14. Vancouver Seattle Whitefish Portland Minot Fargo Superior Mandan Billings Hettinger Minneapolis/ St. Paul Gillette Klamath Falls La Crosse Bridger Jct Alliance Sioux City Chicago Ravenna Salt Lake City Galesburg Lincoln McCook Stockton Denver Superior Machens St. Louis Kansas City La Junta Arkansas Springfield Bakersfield Avard City Mojave Needles Texline Los Angeles Tulsa San Bernardino Oklahoma Norris Memphis City Belen Amarillo Phoenix Texico Birmingham Haslet Air Monitoring Assets Ft. Worth Sweetwater El Paso Teague CTEH Temple Spring New Orleans Tac Tox Houston CRA Tier I INet March 11 th , 2013

  15. Vancouver Hazmat Specialized Equipment Seattle Whitefish Spokane Havre Portland Minot Pasco Fargo Superior Billings Minneapolis/ St. Paul Gillette Klamath Falls Alliance Sioux City Chicago Salt Lake City Galesburg Richmond Lincoln Stockton Denver St. Louis Kansas City Newton Springfield Rialto Barstow Flagstaff Los Angeles Tulsa Oklahoma Memphis = ER Air Trailer City Belen Amarillo Phoenix = Fire Trailer Birmingham Type I (Large) Ft. Worth El Paso Type II (Small) Teague = Chlorine Kits Temple New Orleans Houston = Midland Kits February 2013

  16. 6/11/2013 16

More recommend