Penn State Health and Human Development Building State College, PA Rendering Provided by BCJ Christopher Graziani Advisor: Craig Dubler Construction Management
Penn State Health and Human Development Building State College, PA Previous View From Existing Building College Avenue Multi-Use Spaces Structure Rendering Provided by BCJ Rendering Provided by BCJ Future View From College Avenue Rendering Provided by BCJ Christopher Graziani | AE Senior Thesis | Construction Management Option
Penn State Health and Human Development Building State College, PA Previous View From College Avenue Multi-Use Spaces Rendering Provided by BCJ Rendering Provided by BCJ Rendering Provided by BCJ Demolition Phase Future View From College Avenue Rendering Provided by BCJ Christopher Graziani | AE Senior Thesis | Construction Management Option
Penn State Health and Human Development Building State College, PA Previous View From College Avenue Multi-Use Spaces Rendering Provided by BCJ Rendering Provided by BCJ New Construction Future View From College Avenue Rendering Provided by BCJ Rendering Provided by BCJ Christopher Graziani | AE Senior Thesis | Construction Management Option
Penn State Health and Human Development Building Project Overview State College, PA I. Introduction A. Project Overview B. Project Features Analysis 1 – Stair Tower Redesign II. HUB Lawn A. Problem Identification & Overview B. Structural Breadth C. Cost and Schedule Impact Analysis Analysis 2 – Return Air Plenum III. A. System Research B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons C. Mechanical Breadth and Conclusions IV. Analysis 3 – Alternative Excavation Options A. Blasting vs. Rock Hammering Old Main Lawn B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons C. Research and Conclusions V. Conclusion & Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements View Taken from Google Maps Christopher Graziani | AE Senior Thesis | Construction Management Option
Penn State Health and Human Development Building Project Features State College, PA I. Introduction A. Project Overview B. Project Features Analysis 1 – Stair Tower Redesign II. A. Problem Identification & Overview Project Features B. Structural Breadth C. Cost and Schedule Impact Analysis Building Renovation Analysis 2 – Return Air Plenum III. A. System Research Large Atrium Space B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons C. Mechanical Breadth and Conclusions Architectural Screen Wall IV. Analysis 3 – Alternative Excavation Options A. Blasting vs. Rock Hammering Pursuing LEED Certified B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons C. Research and Conclusions Soil Nail Wall V. Conclusion & Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements Rendering Provided by BCJ Soil Nail Wall Installation Architectural Screen Wall In Atrium Christopher Graziani | AE Senior Thesis | Construction Management Option
Penn State Health and Human Development Building Analysis 1 – Stair Tower Redesign State College, PA I. Introduction A. Project Overview B. Project Features Analysis 1 – Stair Tower Redesign II. A. Problem Identification & Overview Problem Statement: B. Structural Breadth C. Cost and Schedule Impact Analysis Analysis 2 – Return Air Plenum III. Concrete stair tower acting as a shear wall caused A. System Research significant delays to the project schedule and provided a B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons low quality product at project turnover C. Mechanical Breadth and Conclusions IV. Analysis 3 – Alternative Excavation Options A. Blasting vs. Rock Hammering B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons C. Research and Conclusions V. Conclusion & Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements Christopher Graziani | AE Senior Thesis | Construction Management Option
Penn State Health and Human Development Building Problem Identification & Overview State College, PA I. Introduction A. Project Overview B. Project Features Analysis 1 – Stair Tower Redesign II. A. Problem Identification & Overview B. Structural Breadth Desired Benefits C. Cost and Schedule Impact Analysis Analysis 2 – Return Air Plenum III. Faster Installation Time A. System Research B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons Higher Quality of Finish C. Mechanical Breadth and Conclusions IV. Analysis 3 – Alternative Excavation Options Improved Coordination of Trades A. Blasting vs. Rock Hammering B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons Worker Safety C. Research and Conclusions V. Conclusion & Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements Tower Twisting and Interior Finish Concrete Stair Tower Installation Christopher Graziani | AE Senior Thesis | Construction Management Option
Penn State Health and Human Development Building Structural Breadth State College, PA I. Introduction A. Project Overview Purpose: B. Project Features Analysis 1 – Stair Tower Redesign II. Change the concrete stair tower to a steel A. Problem Identification & Overview Steel Design Summary braced frame with drywall infill B. Structural Breadth Size Quantity Length (ft) C. Cost and Schedule Impact Analysis Maximum Axial Forces Analysis 2 – Return Air Plenum III. HSS 4-1/2 x 4-1/2 x 3/8 10 19.8 Column = 307.3 Kips A. System Research HSS 6 x 6 x 1/4 10 29.5 B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons Horizontal Beams = 36 Kips Parameters C. Mechanical Breadth and Conclusions W14x90 8 28 IV. Analysis 3 – Alternative Excavation Options W14x90 4 14 Wind Loads A. Blasting vs. Rock Hammering W10x30 10 26 B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons RISA Program for Calculations C. Research and Conclusions W10x17 10 14 V. Conclusion & Recommendations Fireproofing VI. Acknowledgements Wall Partition Fill RISA Program Showing Axial Loads Christopher Graziani | AE Senior Thesis | Construction Management Option
Penn State Health and Human Development Building Cost and Schedule Impact Analysis State College, PA I. Introduction Summary for Current Design A. Project Overview Cost Savings from Steel Design Material $ 147,031.50 B. Project Features • Equipment $ 40,750.00 Current Design = $244,180.70 Analysis 1 – Stair Tower Redesign II. Manpower $ 57,029.20 • A. Problem Identification & Overview Proposed Design = $123,412.41 $ 244,810.70 B. Structural Breadth Photo Taken by David Walenga • Savings = $121,398.29 C. Cost and Schedule Impact Analysis Schedule 5 weeks (25 Days) Analysis 2 – Return Air Plenum III. Summary for New Design A. System Research B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons Item Cost Schedule Savings from Steel Interior Finish of C. Mechanical Breadth and Conclusions Steel $ 75,955.44 Design Concrete Stair IV. Analysis 3 – Alternative Excavation Options Fireproofing $ 7,939.27 Tower A. Blasting vs. Rock Hammering • Current Design = 25 Days Fill (Framed Drywall) $ 39,517.70 B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons $ 123,412.41 • Proposed Design = 25 Days C. Research and Conclusions Schedule Summary V. Conclusion & Recommendations • Savings = 0 Total Days Stud Framing Infill of Steel Braced Stair Tower Construction Compared to BIM Model Item Duration (Days) VI. Acknowledgements Frame System • Critical Time Savings = 24 Days Steel Members 1.16 Fireproofing 4.34 6" GWB Partition 20 Christopher Graziani | AE Senior Thesis | Construction Management Option
Penn State Health and Human Development Building Analysis 2 – Return Air Plenum State College, PA I. Introduction A. Project Overview B. Project Features Analysis 1 – Stair Tower Redesign II. A. Problem Identification & Overview B. Structural Breadth Problem Statement: C. Cost and Schedule Impact Analysis Analysis 2 – Return Air Plenum III. A. System Research Tight ceiling spaces cause added schedule time B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons and heavy coordination of trades is required C. Mechanical Breadth and Conclusions IV. Analysis 3 – Alternative Excavation Options A. Blasting vs. Rock Hammering B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons C. Research and Conclusions V. Conclusion & Recommendations VI. Acknowledgements Christopher Graziani | AE Senior Thesis | Construction Management Option
Penn State Health and Human Development Building System Research State College, PA I. Introduction A. Project Overview Purpose: B. Project Features Analysis 1 – Stair Tower Redesign II. Utilize a Return Air Plenum System as A. Problem Identification & Overview Opposed to the Return Air Ductwork B. Structural Breadth C. Cost and Schedule Impact Analysis Analysis 2 – Return Air Plenum III. A. System Research B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons Parameters C. Mechanical Breadth and Conclusions IV. Analysis 3 – Alternative Excavation Options Return Air Ductwork Removal A. Blasting vs. Rock Hammering B. Cost and Schedule Comparisons Fire Damper Requirements C. Research and Conclusions V. Conclusion & Recommendations Plenum Rating Materials VI. Acknowledgements System Requirements BIM Model Showing Ceiling Space Systems Image Taken from Google Image Search Christopher Graziani | AE Senior Thesis | Construction Management Option
Recommend
More recommend
