outreach and engagement spec survey webcast series
play

Outreach and Engagement SPEC Survey Webcast Series December 5, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Outreach and Engagement SPEC Survey Webcast Series December 5, 2018 Introductions Sarah LeMire Shannon L. Farrell Kristen L. Mastel Stephanie J. Graves Texas A&M University of University of Texas A&M University University


  1. Outreach and Engagement SPEC Survey Webcast Series December 5, 2018

  2. Introductions Sarah LeMire Shannon L. Farrell Kristen L. Mastel Stephanie J. Graves Texas A&M University of University of Texas A&M University University Minnesota Minnesota stephaniegraves@tamu.edu slemire@tamu.edu sfarrell@umn.edu meye0539@umn.edu #ARLSPECKit361 2 Association of Research Libraries

  3. How Did We Get Here? Forming our outreach community : • All working on outreach activities • Struggling with issues of oversight, staffing, and assessment • Trying to demonstrate value of our work to stakeholders • Difficulty finding programmatic models for outreach in librarianship #ARLSPECKit361 3 Association of Research Libraries

  4. The SPEC Survey Survey ran in summer of 2018 : • 125 ARL member institutions • 46% (57) response rate • Limitations: o Variant nature of responding institutions o One representative responding from each institution o Non-organizational structure of outreach makes the survey structure difficult #ARLSPECKit361 4 Association of Research Libraries

  5. What is Outreach? #ARLSPECKit361 5 Association of Research Libraries

  6. Definition of Outreach There is no agreed upon definition of outreach or activities at ARL institutions. #ARLSPECKit361 6 Association of Research Libraries

  7. Outreach to Specific Populations #ARLSPECKit361 7 Association of Research Libraries

  8. Activities During the Previous Year #ARLSPECKit361 8 Association of Research Libraries

  9. Institutional Support #ARLSPECKit361 9 Association of Research Libraries

  10. Outreach in Library Mission and Vision Statements #ARLSPECKit361 10 Association of Research Libraries

  11. Outreach Budgeting as Ad Hoc • 72% did NOT have a defined Outreach budget 83% reported using central library o budget, but no line item for outreach o Departmental and special funds were prevalent sources Who managed outreach funds o varied greatly, but was most common amongst administrators, managers, or committees. Difficulty reporting annual o expenditures (graph) without central management and defined budgets #ARLSPECKit361 11 Association of Research Libraries

  12. Establishing Goals and Outcomes #ARLSPECKit361 12 Association of Research Libraries

  13. Developing Outreach Goals and Outcomes #ARLSPECKit361 13 Association of Research Libraries

  14. Responsibility for Outreach Goals and Outcomes #ARLSPECKit361 14 Association of Research Libraries

  15. Common Outreach Goals and Outcomes Goal/Outcome Frequency promote services 9 collaboration and partnerships 6 engagement 7 student success and retention 5 collections 3 information literacy 3 promote resources 3 access 2 membership and participation 2 social media 2 use of library 2 user experience 2 welcoming 2 #ARLSPECKit361 15 Association of Research Libraries

  16. Planning Outreach Activities #ARLSPECKit361 16 Association of Research Libraries

  17. Timelines for Planning Outreach #ARLSPECKit361 17 Association of Research Libraries

  18. Approval for Outreach Events #ARLSPECKit361 18 Association of Research Libraries

  19. Frequency of Constraints #ARLSPECKit361 19 Association of Research Libraries

  20. Staffing Outreach #ARLSPECKit361 20 Association of Research Libraries

  21. Outreach Leadership Activities #ARLSPECKit361 21 Association of Research Libraries

  22. Outreach Staffing Outreach staffing operationalized: • 95% have personnel with outreach responsibilities in their position descriptions • 84% evaluate personnel on outreach activities, with more structure if it is directly embedded in job duties • Public services librarians and employees tend to staff outreach events more frequently • Many still rely on calls for volunteers from across the library #ARLSPECKit361 22 Association of Research Libraries

  23. Outreach Challenges #ARLSPECKit361 23 Association of Research Libraries

  24. Collaboration #ARLSPECKit361 24 Association of Research Libraries

  25. Collaboration Across ARL Institutions #ARLSPECKit361 25 Association of Research Libraries

  26. Assessment and Reporting #ARLSPECKit361 26 Association of Research Libraries

  27. Assessment Methods Assessment Method % Responses • Libraries are using a variety of Headcounts 98.21% 55 assessment methods Surveys 82.14% 46 • Most are quick, unobtrusive, Interviews 28.57% 16 and less resource-intensive Focus groups 37.50% 21 Minute papers 19.64% 11 Observations 94.64% 53 Collecting comments 82.14% 46 Compiling social media comments 58.93% 33 Feedback from outreach volunteers and partners 87.50% 49 Usage statistics 78.57% 44 Other method, please briefly describe 16.07% 9 #ARLSPECKit361 27 Association of Research Libraries

  28. Assessment Responsibility #ARLSPECKit361 28 Association of Research Libraries

  29. Assessment Leadership Responsible for assessing overall outreach program % Responses Library dean/director 10.71% 6 • Majority response: No one Other library Administrator 12.50% 7 person was responsible for Department head 3.57% 2 assessing overall outreach Outreach head/director/librarian 12.50% 7 program Assessment librarian or dedicated assessment staff person 8.93% 5 • Of those institutions who Library event planner 0.00% 0 had a primary person Event planning committee 3.57% 2 responsible, they were: Communications and marketing staff 3.57% 2 o Administrators (13) Parent institution assessment unit 0.00% 0 o Outreach librarians (7) No one is responsible for overall program o Assessment librarians (5) assessment at this time 26.79% 15 Other individual or group, please specify 17.86% 10 #ARLSPECKit361 29 Association of Research Libraries

  30. Using Assessment Data & Reporting Impact • Majority of respondents have canceled/discontinued (38, or 68%), or made changes (49, or 88%) to events based on assessment data • Outreach activities are typically reported in performance evaluations (44, or 79%) & assessment data is used to respond to admin requests (32, or 57%) • Reports are provided to administrators on a regular basis (28, or 50%) • Majority do not have a defined time frame to demonstrate success or impact (34, or 61%) #ARLSPECKit361 30 Association of Research Libraries

  31. Case Studies #ARLSPECKit361 31 Association of Research Libraries

  32. Case Study Findings • Types of Events: o Resource Fairs o Open House Events o Finals De-Stressing Activities o “Human Library” Events • Collaborations and Partnerships: o Academic Departments o Student Support Units Writing Centers  Wellness Centers  • Budgets: o Vary from $0 to $50,000 per event #ARLSPECKit361 32 Association of Research Libraries

  33. Recommendations #ARLSPECKit361 33 Association of Research Libraries

  34. Recommendations cont. • Define what outreach means for your institution. • Institutions should establish a programmatic approach to outreach; coordinate, budget, plan, and staff at the program level • A variety of assessment methods should be used and mapped back to goals • Library staff would benefit from more training around both goal writing and assessment strategies for outreach #ARLSPECKit361 34 Association of Research Libraries

  35. Questions & Discussion Join the conversation by typing questions in the chat box in the lower left corner of your screen

  36. Thank you!

Recommend


More recommend