off state tddb in high voltage gan mis hemts
play

OFF-state TDDB in High-Voltage GaN MIS-HEMTs Shireen Warnock and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

OFF-state TDDB in High-Voltage GaN MIS-HEMTs Shireen Warnock and Jess A. del Alamo Microsystems Technology Laboratories (MTL) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Purp rpose Further understanding of time-dependent dielectric


  1. OFF-state TDDB in High-Voltage GaN MIS-HEMTs Shireen Warnock and Jesús A. del Alamo Microsystems Technology Laboratories (MTL) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

  2. Purp rpose • Further understanding of time-dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB) in GaN MIS-HEMTs • Explore TDDB under high-voltage OFF-state conditions: most common state in the operation of a power switching transistor 2

  3. Outl tline • Motivation & Challenges • Initial Results & Breakdown Statistics • Ultraviolet Light During Recovery & Stress • Conclusions 3

  4. Motivation GaN Field-Effect Transistors (FETs) promising for high-voltage power applications  more efficient & smaller footprint 4

  5. Ga GaN N Reliability Challenges Inverse piezoelectric effect J. A. del Alamo, MR 2009 5

  6. Ga GaN N Reliability Challenges Inverse piezoelectric effect J. A. del Alamo, MR 2009 Current collapse D. Jin, IEDM 2013 6

  7. Ga GaN N Reliability Challenges Inverse piezoelectric effect J. A. del Alamo, MR 2009 Current collapse D. Jin, IEDM 2013 V T instability 7

  8. Ga GaN N Reliability Challenges Inverse piezoelectric effect J. A. del Alamo, MR 2009 Current collapse D. Jin, IEDM 2013 Gate dielectric reliability V T instability 8

  9. Time me-Dep epen enden ent D Dielectr tric ic B Brea eakdown • High gate bias → defect generation → catastrophic oxide breakdown • Often dictates lifetime of chip Gate material melted Typical TDDB experiments: after breakdown Si high-k MOSFETs Si MOSFET D. R. Wolters, Philips J. Res. 1985 T. Kauerauf, EDL 2005 9

  10. TDDB DDB i in G GaN MIS-HEMTs Ts S. Warnock, G. Meneghesso, SST 2016 T.-L. Wu, IRPS 2013 CS MANTECH 2015 • Classic TDDB observed • But: studies to date all on positive gate stress TDDB → More relevant for D-mode devices: TDDB under OFF-state 10

  11. OFF-state te S Stress • Negative gate bias turns FET off; high bias on drain • Relevant operational condition for GaN power circuits 11

  12. OFF-state te S Stress • Negative gate bias turns FET off; high bias on drain • Relevant operational condition for GaN power circuits • Electrostatics more complicated than under positive gate stress Positive gate stress OFF-state stress • TDDB failure can result from peak in electric field during OFF-state • Study devices with no field plates for simplicity 12

  13. Dielectr tric Reliability ty in GaN FE FETs AlGaN/GaN metal-insulator-semiconductor high electron mobility transistors (MIS-HEMTs) Goals of this work: - What does TDDB look like in the OFF-state stress condition? - How do transient instabilities (current collapse, V T shift) affect our ability to observe TDDB? 13

  14. Initi tial R Results ts & Breakdown Stati tisti tics 14

  15. GaN Ga N MIS-HEMTs for T TDDB DB Stud udy • GaN MIS-HEMTs from industry collaboration: depletion-mode • Gate stack has multiple layers & interfaces → Uncertain electric field distribution → Many trapping sites GaN MOSFET • Complex dynamics involved A. Guo, → Unstable and fast changing V T IRPS 2016 → Current collapse 15

  16. Consta tant nt-Voltage OFF FF-sta tate Stre ress V GS,stress < 0 V, high V DS,stress I G =I D  damage at drain-side edge of gate 16

  17. Consta tant nt-Voltage OFF FF-sta tate Stre ress V GS,stress < 0 V, high V DS,stress soft breakdown I G =I D  damage at drain-side edge of gate 17

  18. Consta tant nt-Voltage OFF FF-sta tate Stre ress V GS,stress < 0 V, high V DS,stress soft breakdown I G =I D  damage at drain-side edge of gate 18

  19. Consta tant nt-Voltage OFF FF-sta tate Stre ress V GS,stress < 0 V, high V DS,stress final hard breakdown soft breakdown t BD I G =I D  damage at drain-side edge of gate 19

  20. Consta tant nt-Voltage OFF FF-sta tate Stre ress Pause stress every 50 s and characterize device stress characterization • Multiple jumps in stress I G before final breakdown ‒ Corresponds to increase in I-V OFF-state leakage • Significant current collapse 20

  21. OF OFF-sta tate Step-Stress Step V DS,stress : Δ V DS,stress =5 V, each 100 s/step • Moderate stress: I G =I D decreases during stress step  trapping • High stress: I G increases  stress-induced leakage current (SILC) 21

  22. OF OFF-sta tate Step-Stress Transfer characteristics in between stress steps • Very large V T shifts (first positive, then negative) and hysteresis • Progressive increase in current collapse for increasing V DS,stress 22

  23. OF OFF-sta tate TDDB Sta tatistics Time to final breakdown (I G =1 mA) positive gate stress TDDB S. Warnock, IRPS 2016 • Statistics do not follow Weibull distribution • Spread over many orders of magnitude 23

  24. Trapping a at Drain-end o of Chann nnel In OFF-state, large electric field peak at drain-end of channel  Severe electron trapping • Trapping affects electric field • Depends on trap concentration, location, etc.  highly random 24

  25. Ultravi violet Light Duri ring Recove very & Stre ress 25

  26. UV Li Light t t to Miti tigate Trapping Need to separate current collapse, V T shift from permanent degradation D. Jin, IEDM 2013 • UV light very effective for de-trapping in GaN • Choose 3.5 eV for TDDB study 26

  27. OFF-state S e Step ep-Stress: R : Rec ecovery with th U UV • Step V DS,stress : Δ V DS,stress =5 V, each 100 s • Before characterization, shine 3.5 eV UV light for 5 minutes after each stress step • No UV during stress  expect unchanged stress leakage current 27

  28. OFF-state S e Step ep-Stress: R : Rec ecovery with th U UV Transfer characteristics in between stress steps • Current collapse mitigated • No positive V T shift, only negative  NBTI 28

  29. OFF-state S e Step ep-Stress ss: S Stress w s with UV UV • Step V DS,stress : Δ V DS,stress =5 V, each step 100 s/step • 3.5 eV UV light during stress, and 5 minutes after (to eliminate residual trapping) 29

  30. OFF-state S e Step ep-Stress ss: S Stress w s with UV UV • Step V DS,stress : Δ V DS,stress =5 V, 100 s/step (step-stress in dark) • No evidence of trapping for moderate V DS,stress • Clear appearance of SILC at higher voltage • Breakdown at 60 V compared to ~ 110 V for step-stress in dark 30

  31. OFF-state S e Step ep-Stress ss: S Stress w s with UV UV Transfer characteristics in between stress steps • Current collapse entirely mitigated • Negative V T shift  NBTI 31

  32. OF OFF-sta state C Const stant-Voltage T TDDB S Statisti tics cs Compare TDDB in the dark and with 3.5 eV UV during stress • UV statistics now follow Weibull distribution • Breakdown occurs sooner, even with V DS,stress ~ 25% less • UV mitigates trapping  electric field ↑ 32

  33. Conclusions • Investigated OFF-state TDDB in GaN MIS-HEMTs for the first time • Without UV light: ‒ Current collapse, V T shift ‒ Cannot separate transient and permanent effects ‒ Non-Weibull breakdown statistics • With UV light: ‒ Current collapse completed mitigated ‒ Progressive negative V T shift  NBTI ‒ UV de-trapping yields higher electric field  accelerated breakdown ‒ Breakdown follows Weibull distribution • Next work: estimate electric field to develop lifetime model 33

  34. Acknowled edgem emen ents Dr. José Jiménez, IRPS 2017 mentor 34

  35. Qu Ques estion ons? 35

Recommend


More recommend