m etrorail s tation d esign
play

M ETRORAIL S TATION D ESIGN Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

P OTOMAC Y ARD M ETRORAIL S TATION D ESIGN Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group March 17, 2016 A GENDA I. Introductions II. Station Concept Update III. Potomac Yard Park IV. Small Group Discussion V. PYMIG Discussion VI.


  1. P OTOMAC Y ARD M ETRORAIL S TATION D ESIGN Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group March 17, 2016

  2. A GENDA I. Introductions II. Station Concept Update III. Potomac Yard Park IV. Small Group Discussion V. PYMIG Discussion VI. Final EIS Update VII. Temporary Construction Impacts VIII.Next Steps IX. Comments/Questions X. Adjourn 2 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  3. STATION CONCEPT UPDATE 3 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  4. S TATION D ESIGN - P RECEDENTS 4 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  5. S TATION D ESIGN - P RECEDENTS 5 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  6. S TATION C ONCEPT - S TUDIES 6 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  7. S TATION C ONCEPT - S TUDIES 7 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  8. S TATION C ONCEPT - S TUDIES 8 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  9. S TATION C ONCEPT - S TUDIES 9 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  10. S TATION C ONCEPT – O PTION 1 10 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  11. S TATION C ONCEPT – O PTION 1 PROPOSED PLANTINGS (TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES PROVIDED FOR WETLAND RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION) HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO SHOW STATION FORM 11 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  12. S TATION C ONCEPT – O PTION 1 PROPOSED PLANTINGS (TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES PROVIDED FOR WETLAND RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION) HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO SHOW STATION FORM 12 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  13. S TATION C ONCEPT – O PTION 2 13 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  14. S TATION C ONCEPT – O PTION 2 PROPOSED PLANTINGS (TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES PROVIDED FOR WETLAND RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION) HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO SHOW STATION FORM 14 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  15. S TATION C ONCEPT – O PTION 2 PROPOSED PLANTINGS (TREES, SHRUBS, GRASSES PROVIDED FOR WETLAND RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION) HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO SHOW STATION FORM 15 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  16. C OMPARISON OF O PTIONS 1 AND 2 Option 1 Option 2 16 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  17. E AST E NTRY B RIDGE *Images are for illustrative purposes only 17 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  18. S OUTH P AVILION C ONCEPT South Entrance Looking East from East Glebe 18 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  19. P EDESTRIAN B RIDGES - C ONCEPTS 19 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  20. POTOMAC YARD PARK 20 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  21. P OTOMAC Y ARD P ARK – W HAT WE H EARD … 1. Would you prefer the space to be more structured (Option A) or more flexible (Option B)? Structured = 44.0 % Flexible = 51.8 % Other = 4.2 % 2. Do you want the design of the park area around the Metro station to be consistent/continuous with the whole park? Or should this area have its own identity? Consistent with the whole park = 72.3% Should have its own identity = 23.5% Other = 4.2% 21 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  22. P OTOMAC Y ARD P ARK – C ONCEPT (P LAN V IEW ) 22 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  23. P OTOMAC Y ARD P ARK – C ONCEPT (P ERSPECTIVES ) 23 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  24. SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION 24 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  25. S TATION C ONCEPTS • Several themes have been heard consistently : – The Metro station should sit lightly in the landscape – The Metro station should be complementary to its surroundings (Potomac Yard, Potomac Greens, and the George Washington Memorial Parkway) – The Metro station design should minimize the visibility of the station from the Parkway – The Metro station design should take advantage of views from inside the station • Based on these themes, which concept best achieves the objectives outlined above and why? 25 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  26. P OTOMAC Y ARD P ARK C ONCEPT • Themes we heard from the February PYMIG: – Split votes on if the space should be more structured or more flexible. – The design of the park area around the Metro station should be consistent/continuous with the whole park. • Based on these themes, please provide any comments on the design concept? 26 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  27. GROUP FEEDBACK 27 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  28. PYMIG DISCUSSION 28 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  29. FINAL EIS UPDATE 29 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  30. F INAL EIS U PDATE • Second round of comments from FTA and NPS received March 15 • Final EIS will be circulated for public review and comment for 30 days (anticipated Spring 2016) • Final EIS includes proposed mitigation • Public comments may affect mitigation commitments formalized in Records of Decision (anticipated Summer 2016) 30 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  31. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS 31 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  32. C ONSTRUCTION A CCESS • Construction Access Options studied for the EIS: • Access from George Washington Memorial Parkway • Access through Old Town Greens and Potomac Greens • Use of cranes from the west side of the CSX right-of-way • NPS prohibits construction access from the GWMP and will not allow the use of the parkway by construction traffic. • No construction over active railroad tracks. • All construction traffic will use Route 1. 32 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  33. C ONSTRUCTION A CCESS • The following graphics are approximations of the breakdown by route of the amount of anticipated construction traffic. • To reduce traffic to and from the station site, a location is being sought for construction worker parking. • This off-site parking would be required for all construction workers, who would be bused to the site. 33 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  34. C ONSTRUCTION A CCESS • Construction traffic traveling north on Potomac Greens Drive has 2 options once it reaches the traffic circle at the intersection of Potomac Greens Drive and Carpenter Road: Potomac Greens Drive or Carpenter Road. • Community input is being sought on the selection of the preferred option. • The landscaped area of the traffic circle will be removed before construction and restored at the end of construction. • The 2 playgrounds will be relocated and the tennis courts will be closed throughout the period of construction. 34 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  35. T EMPORARY P ARK R ELOCATION 35 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  36. C ONSTRUCTION I MPACTS Overnight and weekend work will be required. • Additionally, some work will require that Blue & Yellow • Line service be suspended during weekends. The construction schedule will be determined once the • contractor is determined. 36 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  37. A PPROXIMATE L IMITS OF D ISTURBANCE Approx. Limits of Disturbance Approx. Limits of Disturbance 37 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  38. C ITY O VERSIGHT Construction activities occurring during “off” hours will • require special permits and will have to comply with City processes. The City will have a full time employee located on site • who will oversee activities to ensure that the community impacts are minimized to the fullest extent possible. The City and WMATA personnel will keep the community • up to date on construction activities and will be readily available to answer questions and address concerns or complaints throughout the duration of construction. 38 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  39. N EXT S TEPS • Ongoing DSUP process – June Public Hearing • BAR Work Sessions – April 20 • Finalize EIS • Update Boards and Commissions 39 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  40. COMMENTS / QUESTIONS 40 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

  41. Q UESTIONS ? For more information, visit: www.alexandriava.gov/PotomacYard 41 Potomac Yard Metrorail Implementation Work Group| March 17, 2016

Recommend


More recommend