Integrated Development Plan Feedback Session – October 2017 Theme: Service with pride and dignity IDP Community Presentation by MMC,
PURPOSE • Give feedback on issues raised during the Constituency Consultations; • Outline the City’s strategies, outcomes and priorities towards development; • To give an overview of the region in terms of its demographic status and key development challenges; and • To report on the implementation of the Region’s CBP Projects 2
Contents • COJ’s Strategic Imperatives: 1. Vision and Mission 2. IDP Priorities and GDS Outcomes • What is an IDP • Challenges Facing the City • What we aim to achieve • About the Region: 1. Demographic Figures 2. Types of Dwelling • Key issues • Feedback on issues • Service Delivery Breakdown and Capex Allocation • CBP Approved Projects 3 • Conclusion and way forward
Strategic direction: Vision and Mission Vision: “A Joburg that works is a South Africa that works” Mission: “To create an enabling economic environment by making Joburg more responsive in the delivery of quality services” Vision Mission Outcomes Priorities 6
Strategic direction: GDS Outcomes Outcome 1 A growing , diverse and competitive economy that creates jobs Outcome 2 Enhanced, quality services and sustainable environmental practices Outcome 3 An inclusive society with enhanced quality of life that provides meaningful redress through pro-poor development Outcome 4 Build caring , safe and secure communities Outcome 5 An honest , transparent and responsive local government that prides itself on service excellence 5
Strategic Imperatives Priorities of the Administration Promote economic development and attract investment towards achieving 5% COJ STRATEGIC PRIORITIES Priority 1 economic growth that reduces unemployment by 2021. Ensure pro-poor developmen t that addresses inequality and poverty and provides Priority 2 meaningful redress Priority 3 Create a culture of enhanced service delivery with pride Create a sense of security through improved public safety Priority 4 Create an honest and transparent City that fights corruption Priority 5 Create a City that responds to the needs of citizens , customers, stakeholders and Priority 6 businesses Priority 7 Enhance our financial stability Encourage innovation and efficiency through the Smart City programme; and Priority 8 Preserve our resources for future generations Priority 9 6
What is an IDP? PROCESS: Through which the City prepares a strategic development plan which extends over a five year period- coinciding with the Council’s Term of Office (Section 25: MSA 32 of 2000); DOCUMENT: The Integrated Development Plan (IDP Document) is a product of the Integrated Development Planning Process; PLANNING INSTRUMENT: The IDP Document is a principle planning instrument that guides and informs all planning and budgeting in the City; • GUIDING TOOL: the IDP helps the City through community consultations and engagement with pertinent stakeholders to : 1. Identify Key Development Challenges; 2. Formulate its Vision, Mission and Priorities; 3. Develop Appropriate Strategies; 4. Develop relevant organisational structure and mechanisms to realise the vision; 5. Align the Budget with priorities. 7
Challenges facing the City Population estimate: 4.94 million residents (8.9% of South Africa’s total population) Youth Population: 33.2%, 40% of whom are unemployed Total number of households: 1.85 million Housing backlog of over 300,000 with 158,000 on the free housing list Net in-migration of 3,000 people per month Slow economic growth and high unemployment with a marginalised informal economy Slow and unequal service delivery with an infrastructure backlog of R170 billion. Inadequate provision for repairs and maintenance . High rates of poverty and inequality High levels of corruption Severe safety concerns and inadequate police visibility 8
What we aimed to achieve Infrastructure 60% of Capex to be spent in poor areas Progressive allocations towards 10% on repairs and maintenance Service with Pride a way of life Declaration of corruption as Public Enemy Number 1 Establishment of Group Forensic Investigations Unit Establishment of Professional Civil Service and acceleration of Skills Audit Re-integration of entities and regionalisation of services Improve safety and security Measurable improvement in public safety – additional 1500 JMPD officers Multi-Departmental approach to drug epidemic 9
What we aimed to achieve Visible service delivery Centralised grass cutting Street Lights and Traffic Lights Working – 20% reduction in downtime Clean up the city – A re sebetseng War against potholes – more than 120,000 fixed over the past year Better services for the poor Upgrading of 51 informal settlements Increased allocation to Pikitup to increase cleaning services in informal settlements Extended hours at clinics and public libraries in poor communities 10
What we aimed to achieve Addressing the Housing Crisis Fast track completion of housing projects and issuing of title deeds Completion of open and transparent housing list Undertaking study to find a new model for housing provision noting that the RDP model has proven unsuccessful at addressing the crisis. A focus on developing affordable housing in the Inner City . 11
Corruption busting efforts We have established the Group Forensic Investigations Unit under the leadership of General Shadrack Sibiya . Since their establishment, corruption amounting to more than R15 billion in lost or misused funds has been uncovered. There are over 2,000 cases under investigation . The City has taken aggressive action against those implicated : Over 500 people have been arrested , including employees of the City. more than 100 City employees have been suspended 13 employees have resigned , and 12 7 have been dismissed
About Region F Demographic Profile (Brief Summary) • Overview According to census 2011 the population of the Region is 557 657 and the population growth in the region is projected as follows: African 4.4% White -5.8% Coloured 1.7% Asian 2.2% 7
About Region F Socio-Economic Profile 14
About Region F Region F Joburg Other deprivation Population Discouraged Total number of Ward Working Age Employed Unemployed economically not Rank 10 = Density Work-Seeker households active most deprived 23 2 32 188 74.07% 72.92% 4.08% 0.92% 22.08% 10 635 54 2 42 813 71.15% 68.25% 6.42% 0.87% 24.46% 13 266 55 3 29 947 72.05% 60.04% 13.82% 1.59% 24.56% 9 064 56 3 31 096 71.83% 61.04% 12.08% 1.86% 25.02% 10 201 57 3 36 672 72.53% 59.53% 11.72% 1.88% 26.87% 11 936 59 5 5 544 82.90% 61.49% 16.58% 2.00% 19.93% 1 906 60 4 45 372 84.74% 46.10% 9.17% 1.86% 42.87% 13 162 61 7 16 971 81.22% 51.52% 23.29% 6.99% 18.21% 5 134 62 3 21 146 79.11% 62.47% 18.06% 1.36% 18.12% 5 445 63 4 27 083 78.86% 59.87% 18.16% 1.75% 20.22% 9 410 64 4 34 307 76.59% 59.23% 20.09% 1.40% 19.27% 11 430 65 10 24 037 84.62% 49.92% 22.36% 5.52% 22.20% 11 506 66 4 45 451 74.65% 57.05% 12.73% 1.76% 28.46% 13 998 67 3 22 168 78.41% 51.93% 10.45% 1.52% 36.10% 7 268 122 9 52 056 68.71% 44.15% 21.30% 4.67% 29.87% 15 555 123 5 43 192 82.24% 56.12% 15.75% 2.62% 25.52% 15 135 124 4 43 067 77.54% 60.76% 12.26% 2.88% 24.10% 15 838 15 125 3 45 671 77.06% 49.23% 8.88% 1.38% 40.51% 10 921
About Region F Types of Dwelling 16
About Region F Region F Informal Traditional dwelling (shack; Townhouse House or dwelling/hut/str Flat or Informal not in backyard; Cluster house in Semi-detached House/flat/room (semi-detached brick/concrete ucture made of apartment in a dwelling (shack; e.g. in an complex house in a house in backyard block structure traditional block of flats in backyard) informal/squatte complex) materials r settlement or on a farm) 68% 0% 2% 6% 19% 0% 2% 1% 0% 58% 0% 5% 8% 23% 2% 2% 0% 0% 52% 0% 23% 0% 2% 1% 18% 1% 0% 50% 0% 18% 3% 5% 2% 17% 1% 0% 61% 0% 12% 0% 3% 2% 17% 0% 0% 9% 1% 88% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 1% 88% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 38% 1% 37% 2% 0% 0% 10% 4% 4% 2% 2% 94% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 3% 1% 92% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 12% 1% 71% 0% 2% 0% 11% 0% 0% 48% 1% 16% 1% 1% 1% 8% 2% 18% 58% 1% 22% 1% 1% 2% 10% 1% 0% 18% 1% 61% 1% 2% 0% 12% 0% 1% 59% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 4% 17% 16% 8% 2% 82% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 36% 1% 40% 0% 1% 1% 17% 1% 1% 17 69% 0% 4% 9% 12% 0% 3% 0% 1%
Summary of Key Issues Total Community Issues Raised Per Dept. & Municipal Entity Total Department / Municipal Entity 100 25 City Power 93 44 CoJ Health 90 Community Development 48 80 CRUM ISD 3 1 CRUM Regulatory 70 37 DED 60 DED / ComDev 1 44 GFIS 44 48 48 50 44 44 39 Housing 39 37 Immigration 2 40 35 JCPZ 48 30 25 1 23 JCPZ / JMPD 19 17 23 JMPD 20 12 JMPD 1 10 5 Joburg Water 19 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 JPC 0 44 JRA Pikitup 17 Pikitup / JMPD 5 2 Revenue 93 SAPS / JMPD Social Development 12 1 Social Development / JMPD 35 Town Planning 2 Transportation 18 550 Grand Total
Feedback on issues 19
Recommend
More recommend
