facilities update may 24 2016
play

Facilities Update May 24, 2016 Citizens Standing Advisory Committee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Facilities Update May 24, 2016 Citizens Standing Advisory Committee Todd Johnson Jamie Cheney Agenda Transportation Bicycle/Pedestrian Updates Infrastructure Updates Strategic Plan Update Development Update


  1. Facilities Update May 24, 2016 Citizens’ Standing Advisory Committee Todd Johnson Jamie Cheney

  2. Agenda • Transportation Bicycle/Pedestrian Updates • Infrastructure Updates • Strategic Plan Update • Development Update

  3. Transportation Updates Jamie Cheney

  4. Highlights • Link Light Rail U-Link Results • 40 th Avenue Improvements • Metro bus stop shelter • Intersection safety improvements • Secure bike parking • 44 th Avenue Connection Improvements • Bike Everywhere Day Celebration

  5. U-Link and Children’s Gold Line Shuttle • U-Link • Ridership exceeding expectation • Beating 2017 ridership targets • Added a third train at peak • Children’s Gold Line Shuttle • Exceeding ridership targets • 80 more riders per day than the Green Line to downtown (before Link)

  6. Metro Transit Improvements • All day frequent service to NE Seattle • 10-15 minute frequency at peak • More service on Sand Point Way • 65, 75 and 78 • Better, closer bus stops to Link and the Hospital • Results • 40-50 more Children’s riders in AM peak

  7. 40 th Avenue Transportation 44 th Ave. NE Improvements Metro has proposed installing a bus shelter at new bus stop on 40 th Avenue. NE 47 th St. Children’s proposing to build new secure bike shelter. Children’s requesting permission to add safety improvements to 40 th Avenue NE and NE 45 th Street.

  8. Metro Bus Stop on 40 th Ave NE • Metro has proposed adding a bus stop shelter • Children’s supports this and has asked Metro for the following: • A large shelter to accommodate peak loads of waiting passengers (17 ft. long with two benches) • Locate where bus stop will have good visibility and lighting for safety • Children’s is interested in adding artwork to shelter

  9. Metro Bus Stop on 40 th Ave NE

  10. 40 th Avenue and 45 th St Intersection • Goal: Improve safety for all users and improve access for pedestrians • Current conditions: • Frequent speeding on NE 45 th Street • Uncontrolled intersection • High percentage of vehicles turning onto 40 th Avenue NE • In March, Metro began operating up to 10 buses per hour on NE 45 th Street and most turn onto 40 th Avenue • Intersection is challenging for pedestrians to cross. Recently, a woman was injured when hit by a car turning on to 40 th Avenue • Safety improvements to crossings on 45 th were high on the list for Livable Streets Initiative but didn’t make it in to phase-1

  11. 40 th Avenue and 45 th St Intersection

  12. 40 th Ave Bike Shelter Conceptual drawing for bike shelter • Shelter will hold 50 bikes • Shelter will not displace any vegetation such as existing trees on edge of property • New screening foliage will be added around structure.

  13. 44 th Avenue Connector 44 th Ave. NE NE 47 th St.

  14. 44 th Avenue Connector Context 39 th Ave. 44 th Ave. NE Greenway 40 th Ave. NE 50 th St. NE 50 th St. Cycle Bike lane Track Villa Academy 44 th Ave Connector Burke Gilman Connector NE 47 th St. To U District Laurelhurst Elementary NE 45 th St. NE 45 th St. 45 th Ave. NE To UW Laurelhurst Light Community Center Rail NE 41 st St.

  15. Retain Foliage Screening N Looking South on 44 th Ave. Any path would be constructed to retain the foliage buffer that screens the parking lot and facilities west of 44 th Ave. from the residents on 44 th Ave.

  16. 44 th Avenue Connector Concept 1 N

  17. Bike Everywhere Celebration Station

  18. Questions

  19. Infrastructure Updates Todd Johnson

  20. Infrastructure Upgrades 1. Fuel tank 1 replacement 2 2002 2. Transformer replacement 3 2014 1988 1992 in new vault 1992 3. Seismic 1962 upgrades 1974 1974 4. MRI addition 1974 1974 1951 2011 1992 2003 4

  21. Strategic Planning at Children’s

  22. Goals and Objectives: System-Wide Source: Seattle Children’s Strategic Plan.

  23. Goals and Objectives: Real Estate/Facilities

  24. Overview of 2017 – 2021 Strategic Initiatives Mission, Vision and Values Growth & Population Community Digital Health Partnerships Integration Health Health Leverage combined Move with the Deliver SC care to Partner to deliver Centralize SC strengths of SCRI market in piloting patients virtually select services approach to and SCH, e.g., new care and enable self- closer to patients community health immunotherapy coordination care and ensure access Transform OBCC models, population to SC for high-end Dedicate resource Enhance the family into an "innovation health and value- care to coordinate and physician center" and based contracts clinical-research experience Dedicate resources "learning lab" integration activities Deepen our PCP to manage Invest in Mental & relationships relationships, Focus growth on Behavioral Health ensure SC quality selected and & safety prioritized clinical and research areas

  25. Building Cure

  26. Research Campus – Future State Plan Building Cure

  27. 2030 Master Plan Master Plan 600 Beds 2.25m SF 2,875 Cars

  28. Main Campus Planning Process Create and Begin Assess Visioning Immediate Master with Work and Prepare Assess Visioning Plan Clinical Plan Long Final Define Current with Options Users Term Work Report Goals State Leadership Study multiple Program Department Report Integrated Project –by- Prepare Master master plan Needs Tours Findings Design Event to project scope Plan Document scenarios to brainstorm ideal definition and phasing for approval understand phasing Space Confirm Project departmental to match with Master and to verify realities and overall Analysis Direction Timeline flows and look Plan assessment priorities with cost and benefit for for operational Finance Committee operations and Infrastructure Strategic Plan synergies facilities Analysis Alignment

  29. Campus Needs

  30. The Drivers for Space Growth • With growth in patient visits, clinical laboratory volumes have increased every year since 1989 when the lab opened in its current location. Lab test menu has grown from 943 to 1869. Staff has risen from 90 to 179. The lab no longer has enough space, power, or chilled water to support growth. • Operating Rooms are utilized well above 90%, with the peer- benchmarked ideal at approximately 80%. OR’s are small in size for the complex cases performed in them. • Cancer patient volumes are growing and we expect more even patients due to advancements in immunotherapy treatments. We are out of capacity to treat patients in the Hem/Onc Clinic • We have seen year over year growth in Faculty/Physicians and now have no office space to support them.

  31. Master Plan Option Overview Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Lab in Current Lab in Lab in Lab in Lab in Lab in North Location Ocean A5 River B/C2 South Addition West Addition Addition

  32. 2030 Master Plan Master Plan 600 Beds 2.25m SF 2,875 Cars

  33. Proposed Solution: Forest B Forest B Phase I

  34. Main Campus – Forest B ARTIST CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

  35. Approved MIMP Schedule

  36. Proposed Project Schedule

  37. Next Steps • Board Approval • SAC Series • MIMP Refresher • Design Guidelines Review, Preview of Preliminary Design • Review Program Need, Tours of Existing Facilities • Review Construction Management Plan • Synthesize Input

  38. Questions

  39. SEATTLE CHILDREN’S SAC MAUREEN SHEEHAN, ORIENTATION CITY OF SEATTLE MAJOR INSTITUTIONS AND May 24, 2016 SCHOOL COORDINATOR

  40. OBJECTIVES PURPOSE AND INTENT WHO ARE THE MAJOR INSTITUTIONS? CAC VS SAC WHAT DOES THE MIMP DO? SAC RESPONSIBILITIES CITY DEPARTMENT ROLES

  41. PURPOSE AND INTENT (SMC 23.69.002) Including, but not limited to: A. Permit appropriate institutional growth within boundaries while minimizing the adverse impacts associated with development and geographic expansion; B. Balance a Major Institution's ability to change and the public benefit derived from change with the need to protect the livability and vitality of adjacent neighborhoods; C. Encourage the concentration of Major Institution development on existing campuses, or alternatively, the decentralization of such uses to locations more than two thousand five hundred (2,500) feet from campus boundaries;

  42. 13 MAJOR INSTITUTIONS Group Health Seattle University Harborview Medical Center South Seattle College North Seattle College Swedish Medical Center Cherry Hill Campus Northwest Hospital and Medical Center Swedish Medical Center First Hill Campus Seattle Central College University of Washington Seattle Children’s Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle Pacific University

  43. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) vs. STANDING ADVISORY COMMITTEE (SAC) CAC SAC It is formed as part of the process of preparing The role of the SAC is to monitor compliance a master plan. with the provisions of the adopted master plan. The City Council officially appoints the CAC. The SAC meets as needed, but no less than The CAC may recommend changes to the plan annually. or possible mitigation of impacts to maintain the health and livability of the surrounding communities. Duration of approx. 2 years

Recommend


More recommend