FACILITIES MASTER PLANNING Regional Community Conversations: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Atla lanta Public Schools FACILITIES MASTER PLANNING Regional Community Conversations: Guardrails, Current and Future Enrollment ry 15 th th , 2020 January 8 th th , Wednesday, Ja January Wednesday, Ja , 2020 6:0 :00 – 8:0 :00 PM 6:0 :00 – 8:0 :00 PM BEST/CS Kin ing In Inman Mid iddle Sch chool ry 16 th th , 2020 ry 22 nd nd , Th Thursday, , Jan January Wednesday, Jan January , 2020 6:0 :00 – 8:0 :00 PM 6:0 :00 – 8:0 :00 PM Therrell Th ll Hig igh Sc School Washin ington Hig igh Sc School Tus uskegee Airm Airmen Glo lobal Ac Academy 20 2019 19 Construction F acilities 1 M aster P lanning

Objectives 1 Goals ls an and In Input fr from Se Session Se Set One 2 Plan lanning Gu Guardrails ils 3 Approach to o Enrollment For orecast F acilities 2 M aster P lanning

Agenda  In Intr troduction Scop Sc ope & Flo Flow Prog ogress to o Date Plan lanning Gu Guar ardrails Curr rrent Cap apac acity Enrollment For orecast Question an Qu and Answer Ne Next xt St Steps Springdale Par Spri ark ES F acilities 3 M aster P lanning

Facilities Master Planning Team SIZEMORE GROUP BLEAKLY ADVISORY GROUP SYCAMORE CONSULTING HL STRATEGY Plan lanning Real eal Es Estate and and De Demographic Ana Analysi sis Engag Eng agement Communications F acilities 4 M aster P lanning

Agenda Intr In troduction  Scope & Fl Flow Prog ogress to o Date Plan lanning Gu Guar ardrails Curr rrent Cap apac acity Enrollment For orecast Con onclusion Ne Next xt St Steps Springdale Par Spri ark ES F acilities 5 M aster P lanning

Facilities Master Planning for APS Ho Howard Bldg. Strategic Clu luster School Capit ital Proje ject F acilities 6 M aster P lanning

Scope & Flow • FEEDBACK LOOP Inventory and In In Inventory and 1 Assessment Assessment Guardrails, Current • COLLECT | SHARE| DECIDE Conditions & Forecasting 2 Sch chool Opti tions 3 • ENGAGEMENT Oth ther Property  Board Recommendations  Community  Key Sessions Im Implementation F acilities 7 M aster P lanning

Agenda In Intr troduction Scop Sc ope & Flo Flow  Prog ogress to o Date Plan lanning Gu Guar ardrails Curr rrent Cap apac acity Enrollment For orecast Question an Qu and Answer Ne Next xt St Steps Springdale Par Spri ark ES F acilities 8 M aster P lanning

Progress to Date OBJ BJECT CTIV IVE: To review input on goals To review input from Community Conversation Set One Share discussions with external entities F acilities 9 M aster P lanning

Facilities Master Plan Goals - Draft The he pl plan annin ing for r this this pr project is is gu guid ided by y thes these go goals ls : To o eq equit itably cr create inn innovativ ive, sus sustain inable, fl flexib ible le, an and effic ficie ient t en envir ironments. To o eq equit itably pr provid ide qua quali lity ty sc schools tha that t alig align facil ilit ity an and ac academic ic ob obje jectiv ives to o str trengthen com ommunitie ies. To o eq equit itably dis distri ribute ins nstructio ional l spa space am amon ong fac acili litie ies. To o eq equit itably alig align pr prop opert rty use use, disp dispositio ion, and and ac acquisit ition with APS APS val alues and and prio priorit itie ies whi hile le exp xplo lorin ing alt alternativ ive opp opport rtunitie ies for or the the usa usage of of facil ilit itie ies. Note: goals will be defined by the Atlanta Board of Education F acilities 10 M aster P lanning

Feedback from Community Conversations What will constitute ‘a successful Stay Updated wit ith master planning process’? Facili litie ies Master Pla lannin ing! What must this is process accompli lish? • Submit Feedback & Questions For APS | For the City of Atlanta: Interagency through Let’s Talk dialogue (AH, IA, Planning) | Beyond • Visit the FMP Website What is is th the most t im important outcome https://www.atlantapublicschools.us/FMP this th is process must provi vide for, , enable le, or r su support? What are your r Iss Issues or r Co Concerns? F acilities 11 M aster P lanning

Q1: What will constitute ‘a successful master planning process’? Expanded Cabinet Key Words Community Conversations Input • Input • Reflective of Student Needs • Process • Community driven • Outcomes • Collaborative • Leverages Property/Resources F acilities 12 M aster P lanning

Q2: What must this process accomplish? Expanded Cabinet Key Words Community Conversations Input • Equitable facilities • Innovation • Sustainable facilities • Updates • Collaboration • Upgrades • Relationships • Equity • Community Input • Input • Collaboration • Outcomes F acilities 13 M aster P lanning

Q3: What is the most important outcome this process must provide for, enable, or support? Expanded Cabinet Key Words Community Conversations Input • Equity • Facilities Aligned w/School • Facilities Goals • Accommodations • Clear Direction • Infrastructure • Addresses Current Needs • Input • Long-Term Planning • Process • Clear Vision • Shared Use • Collaboration • Vision • Long Term Planning F acilities 14 M aster P lanning

Q4: What are your Issues or Concerns? Expanded Cabinet Key Words Community Conversations Input • Equity • Lack of Community Input • Infrastructure • Data is Balanced w/Reality • Facilities • Sustainability • Input • Rezoning • Outcomes • Annexations • Facility-Specific • Intergovernmental Relationships • Cluster-Specific • Social Issues are Addressed F acilities 15 M aster P lanning

Other External Entities • Atlanta Housing • Invest Atlanta • Atlanta Regional Commission • City of Atlanta Planning • City of Atlanta Housing • Enterprise Community Partners • Georgia Tech F acilities 16 M aster P lanning

Agenda In Intr troduction & Ob Obje jectives Scop Sc ope & Flo Flow Prog ogress to o Date  Plannin ing Gua uardrail ils Curr rrent Cap apac acity Enrollment For orecast Qu Question an and Answer Next Ne xt St Steps Springdale Par Spri ark ES F acilities 17 M aster P lanning

Planning Guardrails (Guidelines, Working Premises & Policies) OBJ BJECT CTIV IVE: Present Key Guidelines, Working Premises, & Policies Review Methodology F acilities 18 M aster P lanning

Planning Guidelines 1. 1. Cl Class s Si Size 3. Maximum & Min 3. inimum Sc School l Si Size For facilities, the planning team will calculate APS capacity using Target ranges for the size of ne new schools are established as: the AVERAGES below: • Elementary School 450 – 600 Students • Primary (K-3) – 21 students/classroom • Middle School 750 - 900 Students • Elementary (4-5) – 23 students/classroom • High School 1200 - 2000 Students • Middle (6-8) – 24 students/classroom These planning guidelines do not contemplate closing or • High (9-12) - 25 students/classroom splitting schools solely because they are smaller or larger than the designated range. Note: In 2017 APS switched from planning capacity in all grade levels @25 to the capacities defined in the Student Suc uccess Fo Formula. 4. 4. Sit Site Si Size 2. Ex 2. Exis isti ting Br Brea eakdown of of Gr Grades The following APS mi mini nimum ne new site targets, which include provision of recreation fields and parking, have been established: APS will continue current grade arrangements: • Elementary School Pre-K, K-5 • • Elementary School (5 Acres) Middle School 6-8 • • Middle School (10 Acres) High School 9-12 • High School (25 Acres) Existing schools with different grade level arrangements will remain as currently arranged. Additional grade level configurations will be considered as proposed by the administration. F acilities 19 M aster P lanning

Methodology - Equitable School Ho How w Sch Schoo ool l Cap Capacit ity is Calc Calcula lated: The total number of Instructional Units Non-Core remaining after excluding the non-core Total Instructional Spaces # of Students per Classrooms classrooms, Equity Allocation Classroom (Psychological and Social support), and (SSF) Gifted Programs multiplied by the X = Vs. number of students per classroom. The Equity Allocation number of students per classroom is (SSF Formula) determined using the Funding Level Current Year School Capacity numbers used for each respective Enrollment (FTE-1) grade level. Gifted Programs (SSF Formula) This result is then compared to the Current Year Enrollment (FTE-1) to determine whether a school is Over Capacity, Approaching Capacity, or # Core Classrooms Under Capacity Note: Capacity for Charter Schools is Note: # Core Classrooms assumes spaces set by the specific charter agreement are used as originally intended/designed with APS F acilities 20 M aster P lanning