F o llo w up fro m a Gro up o f So uth K e nsing to n re side nts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

F o llo w up fro m a Gro up o f So uth K e nsing to n re side nts SUBMI T T E R 238

Ove rvie w o f Sub missio n  We suppo rt the c o nstruc tio n o f the Me tro T unne l a s a pie c e o f impo rta nt tra nspo rt infra struc ture fo r Me lb o urne  No t o nly do we suppo rt Optio n B (the a lte rna tive de sig n), we ha ve wo rke d c lo se ly with MMRA o n its de ve lo pme nt  L o c a l re side nts will suffe r a sig nific a nt a mo unt o f disruptio n due to the c o nstruc tio n impa c t a nd will de rive no dire c t b e ne fit fro m the pro je c t  Our ra tio na le is b a se d upo n mitig a ting impa c ts o n o ur lo c a l ne ig hb o urho o d a nd minimising the numb e r o f pro pe rtie s a c q uire d a s a re sult o f the c o nstruc tio n o f the po rta l.  We a re a tig ht knit lo c a l c o mmunity a nd we o b je c t to fa milie s b e ing ne e dle ssly re lo c a te d

Additio na l ma te ria l fo r to da y’ s pre se nta tio n  De ta il o f c o nstruc tio n impa c t c o nc e rns o n Ormo nd, Childe rs, Alto na a nd T e nnyso n Sts  Co nc e rn a b o ut suita b le re pla c e me nt pro pe rtie s in the lo c a l a re a  Co mme nt o n te c hnic a l no te s  I mpa c ts o f pro po se d ne w sc ho o l o n o ur lo c a l a re a  Pe rso na l so c ia l impa c ts o f the c o nstruc tio n o f Optio n A

9 Po te ntia lly Affe c te d Pro pe rtie s

Vie w o f the City o f Me lb o urne Suppo rts Optio n B fo r simila r re a so ns to So uth K e nsing to n re side nts I ssue o f sub -sta tio n in L lo yd St Busine ss Pa rk

Vie w o f the Na tio na l T rust o f Vic to ria “We no te that while the pro po se d We ste rn Po rtal wo uld have adve rse he ritage impac ts o n the Ke nsingto n Pre c inc t (H09), inc luding the de mo litio n fo r fo ur grade d E dwardian re side nc e s (1, 3 and 5–7 Childe rs S tre e t and 133 Ormo nd S tre e t), the alte rnative de sign o ptio n wo uld avo id the de mo litio n o f grade d plac e s within the HO. T he Natio nal T rust the re fo re suppo rts the alte rnative de sign o ptio n, whic h is c o nsiste nt with the E PR to avo id o r minimise impac ts o n po st-se ttle me nt c ultural he ritage value s. We no te that this is also the pre fe rre d o ptio n o f the City o f Me lbo urne (Co M E E S S ubmissio n p.41) We c o nc ur with the City o f Me lbo urne ’ s asse ssme nt that the se grade d re side nc e s “fo rm an impo rtant e dge to the Ke nsingto n He ritage Ove rlay Pre c inc t” and c o ntribute to ne ighbo urho o d c harac te r. T he ir re te ntio n is the re fo re pre fe rre d.”

o c a l Ho using Sto c k L

T e c hnic a l No te s  T N 22 – c le a rly fo c usse d o n c o mpe nsa tio n a nd a c q uisitio n o nly. We q ue ry whe the r furthe r c o nside ra tio n ha s b e e n g ive n to mo ving T o we r 33 within the e xisting e a se me nt.  T N 9 – the o nly wa y he a vy ve hic le a c c e ss c a n b e sa fe ly fa c ilita te d unde r Optio n A is to re mo ve a ll re side nt pa rking in Alto na a nd Ormo nd Sts fo r sig nific a nt pe rio ds o f time .  T N 28 – if site a c c e ss is re q uire d fro m e a rly 2017, ho w will lo c a l fa milie s b e pro pe rly a ffo rde d a re a so na b le time fra me to re -purc ha se pro pe rty, pa rtic ula rly whe n the ma rke t is limite d lo c a lly.  T N 35 – it is e ntire ly ina ppro pria te fo r a sub -sta tio n to b e c o nside re d fo r the L lo yd St industria l E sta te  T N 49 – wha t is the “c o nstruc tio n sha ft”? Wha t is the re a l time line fo r c o nstruc tio n impa c t lo c a lly. T he c ha rt do e s no t a lig n with MMRA me ssa g ing to lo c a l c o mmunity. Ho w do e s this impa c t o n pe de stria n a c c e ss

I mpa c t o f T ruc k T ra ffic  T ruc k a tte mpting to turn fro m Ormo nd St into Alto na St (he a ding we st)

Pa rking in Ormo nd Stre e t o n a We e kda y

e c hnic a l No te 52 T

o c a l Sto rie s a b o ut Re a l Pe o ple L

Re a l Pe o ple

Da vid

a milie s with Yo ung Childre n F

Ja c q ui a nd Da mie n, Gra dy

a lie Andy, Da ve , T a nd Ha ddie

ira , Sa m a nd Ma lc o lm Ste ve , K

Ada m, Sa ra h Anna b e l a nd

a milie s Prima ry Sc ho o l F

Olde r Pe o ple

Ma rg ie a nd Dig b y

Ma ure e n a nd Ro d

De nis

Shift Wo rke rs

a milie s Dire c tly Affe c te d F

Co ry, Na o mi Ge ne vie ve a nd Julie tte

Cla udia a nd Nina , Jo hn Gra c e

Ma tt, Bro n, tha n a nd Mira nda E

Suita b le a lte rna tive ho using o ptio ns if Optio n A is pre fe rre d  3 fa milie s in the ma rke t fo r fa mily ho me s in K e nsing to n  Diffic ulty with so urc ing suita b le a lte rna tive pro pe rtie s in K e nsing to n  Co mme nts fro m MMRA in re la tio n to suita b le ho using sto c k in the a re a : “Co nstruc tio n ac tivitie s wo uld re quire the ac quisitio n o f nine re side nc e s adjac e nt to the rail c o rrido r. S e ve ral o f the se pro pe rtie s ho st vulne rable ho use ho lds with sc ho o l age c hildre n o r re side nts with mo bility impairme nts. T he acquisition of the se pr ope r tie s would like ly r e sult in displace me nt of some of the se house holds due to the limite d availability of e quivale nt housing in the subur b and the like ly cost of alte r native s. T he ac quisitio n o f dwe llings, if it displac e s ho use ho lds, c o uld se ve r e xisting so c ial ne two rks fo r the se familie s as c hildre n c hange sc ho o ls, re side nts mo ve to diffe re nt c o mmunity o rganisatio ns lo c ate d e lse whe re , c hange spo rts c lubs o r ac tivitie s and are ge ne rally le ss able to partic ipate in re gular so c ial e ve nts with the ir ne ighbo urs.” MMRA 10.9

b usine ss o c a l L

Ho lla nd Pa rk re c re a tio n use rs

 All re le va nt sub mitte rs o the r tha n the de ve lo pe r o f the site a t 1-39 Ho b so ns Ro a d suppo rt Optio n B Co nc lusio n  T he re ha s b e e n a sig nific a nt a mo unt o f wo rk do ne o n Optio n B a nd it is no w c le a r tha t it ha s o ve rwhe lming c o mmunity suppo rt  Any de c isio n to suppo rt Optio n A will ha ve e no rmo us so c ia l c o nse q ue nc e s fo r the c o mmunity o f So uth K e nsing to n  As a c o mmunity we suffe r a ve ry sig nific a nt c o nstruc tio n impa c t. T his le g itimise s o ur de ma nd tha t Optio n B b e the pre fe rre d o ptio n fo r pro c e e ding