I E E E F e llo w No mina tio n I E E E I E S F E L L - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

I E E E F e llo w No mina tio n I E E E I E S F E L L OW NOMI NAT I ON ADVI SORY COMMI T T E E

Outline  I ntro duc tio n to F NAC  Curre nt I E S I E E E F e llo w situa tio ns  I E E E F e llo w No mina tio n Pro c e ss

So me I E E E F e llo w Sta tistic s (Ja n 2019)  # o f I E E E Me mb e rs: 429,825 # o f I E E E  Co mpa re d to o ur pe e r siste r so c ie tie s: F e llo ws: 7,862 PE S, I AS, PE L S, RAS, CSC  # o f I E E E Se nio r Me mb e rs: 43,928  PE L S: 3.8%  PE S: 4.65% No te tha t so me o f o ur me mb e rs a re   # o f I E S Me mb e rs: 7,463 a lso me mb e rs o f o the r so c ie tie s, a nd # o f I E E E F e llo ws in I E S: 187 (3% o f I E S  vic e ve rsa me mb e rships)  # o f I E E E Se nio r Me mb e rs in I E S: 1,445

Curre nt I E S F e llo w Situa tio ns  I E S me mb e rs a re unde r-re c o g nize d  We ha ve so ma ny hig hly q ua lifie d, I E E E F e llo w wo rthy me mb e rs. Ye t, ma ny o f o ur c o lle a g ue s a re to o mo de st o r to o b usy to a pply fo r this I E E E F e llo w re c o g nitio n.  So me time s, ho w to e ffe c tive ly na vig a te the no mina tio n pro c e ss c a n b e a fa c to r.  T his c o mmitte e wo uld like to pro mo te a nd a dvise o ur I E S me mb e rs e ffe c tive wa ys to b e e le va te d to I E E E F e llo w whe n re a dy.

I E E E I E S F e llo w No mina tio n Adviso ry Co mmitte e (F NAC)  I E E E I E S F e llo w No mina tio n Adviso ry Co mmitte e (F NAC) is NOT “F e llo w E va lua tio n Co mmitte e (F E C)” C a re two c o mple te ly inde pe nde nt  F NAC a nd F E fro m e a c h o the r – a vo id c o nflic t o f inte re st

I E S I E E E F e llo w Applic a tio n Pro c e ss  T ypic a lly, I E S me mb e rs  So me o the r a ppro a c he s inte re ste d in b e ing e le va te d  A no mina to r b e lie ve s tha t a n a s a n I E E E F e llo w I E S c o lle a g ue de se rve s the I E E E F e llo w re c o g nitio n, the n  Se e ks a no mina to r no mina te s the pe rso n  Se e ks re fe re nc e s  T he no mina to r wo rks with the  Pre pa re the pa c ka g e c a ndida te to se e k re fe re nc e s a nd to pre pa re the pa c ka g e  T he c a ndida te do e s mo st o f the wo rk

E le vation to IE E E F e llow Gr ade T he fo llo wing info rma tio n a re e xc e rpte d fro m I E E E F e llo w We b pa g e : http:/ / www.ie e e .or g/ fe llows

F e llow Gr ade Qualific ation  Unusua l distinc tio n in the pro fe ssio n, a n o utsta nding re c o rd o f a c c o mplishme nts, a dva nc e me nt o r a pplic a tio n o f e ng ine e ring , sc ie nc e , a nd te c hno lo g y, b ring ing the re a liza tio n o f sig nific a nt va lue to so c ie ty  A c o mpe titive pro c e ss a s I E E E Byla w I -305.6 de fine s the ma ximum numb e r o f e le va tio ns tha t c a n o c c ur in a c urre nt c a le nda r ye a r a s 0.1% o f I E E E vo ting me mb e rship, in the pre c e ding c a le nda r ye a r.  As suc h, no t po ssib le to de fine a pre c ise c lo se d se t o f c rite ria tha t e nsure s e le va tio n.  No te the 0.1% e le va tio ns c a p is a pplie d a c ro ss I E E E a s a who le , a s pe r I E E E Byla ws; it must no t b e inte rpre te d a s a pe r-So c ie ty ma ximum o r g uide line .

Wr iting an E ffe c tive IE E E F e llow Nomination  T he No mina tio n F o rm is a c ritic a l do c ume nt during the F e llo w e le va tio n pro c e ss, a nd a s suc h, its c o nte nt is ke y to the suc c e ss o f the no mina tio n.  Re vie we d a nd Asse sse d b y T HRE E se pa ra te a udie nc e s: 1. F e llo w Gra de Re fe re nc e s (3-5 I E E E F e llo ws) 2. So c ie ty/ T e c hnic a l Co unc il F e llo w E va lua ting Co mmitte e (F E C) me mb e rs E va lua to rs) 3. I E E E F e llo w Co mmitte e me mb e rs (Judg e s)

F lowc har t for IE E E F e llowship E le c tion NOMINATOR  Get Information for the candidate and complete Fellow Nomination Form  Identify 3‐5 Referees  Identify Endorsers (optional, 3 max.)  Send Form to Referees and Edorsers  Send Form to Fellow Committee (March 1) REFEREES ENDORSERS  Complete Referee Form  Complete Endorsement Form  Forward to Fellow Committee (March1)  Forward to fellow Committee (March 1)  FELLOW COMMITTEE SOCIETY/COUNCIL EVALUATION COMMITTEE  Send Nomination Form to Society /Technical Council Evaluation Committee( April 15)  Fill Evaluation Form  Scoring for Complete nomination package of candidate with weighted scores in priority order of  Serial ranking of Candidates with Pass/fail groups ‐ Individual contribution  Fine‐tune Citation if necessary ‐ Society Evaluation  Forward to Fellow Committee (June 15) ‐ Referee ‐ Professional Activity (August 31)  Average score of Group Judges  Serial the list of approved Fellows  Fine‐tune citation  Forward recommendation list to Board of Directors (September) BOARD OF DIRECTORS  Announces newly elected Fellow (November/December)

T he Nomination F or m  T hre e funda me nta l a spe c ts: 1. T he individual te c hnic al c o ntributio n(s) to the fie ld ma de b y the No mine e 2. T he impac t fro m the se c o ntrib utio ns, whic h must ha ve a lre a dy o c c urre d a nd b e e vide nt 3. T he e vide nc e suppo rting the c a se . Re me mb e r: Co ntrib utio n + I mpa c t + E vide nc e = Suc c e ss!

Individual Contr ibutions (Se c tion 5 of the Nomination F or m)  T he No mina to r must de sc rib e in this se c tio n the o ne (o r two ) mo st distinc tive c o ntrib utio n(s) ma de b y the No mine e .  a b rie f de sc riptio n o f wha t the No mine e ha s inve nte d, c re a te d, o r disc o ve re d a nd the la sting impa c t o f the c o ntrib utio n.  impa c t must ha ve a lre a dy o c c urre d, a nd spe c ula tio n o n the No mine e ’ s po ssib le future impa c t is no t he lpful to stre ng the ning the No mine e 's c a se .  a vo id ja rg o n, de fine a c ro nyms, a nd b rie fly e xpla in the sta te o f the a rt b e fo re the No mine e ’ s c o ntrib utio n.

Applic ation E ngine e r / Pr ac titione r (AE / P) - 1 Wha t pro duc t de ve lo pme nt, a dva nc e me nt in syste ms, a pplic a tio n o r o pe ra tio n, pro je c t ma na g e me nt o r imple me nta tio n a c tivity, pro c e ss de sig n o r impro ve me nt, ma nufa c turing inno va tio n, c o de s o r sta nda rds o rig ina tio n a nd imple me nta tio n, e tc ., I n the a re a s o f te c hno lo g y a pplic a tio n we re the dire c t re sult o f the No mine e ’ s individua l c o ntrib utio ns? I f c o ntrib utio ns we re ma de a s pa rt o f a g ro up suc h a s a Sta nda rds Co mmitte e , wha t is the c ritic a l ro le the No mine e pla ye d?

Applic ation E ngine e r / Pr ac titione r (AE / P) - 2  Wha t inno va tio n a nd/ o r c re a tivity ha ve b e e n de mo nstra te d?  Wha t ha s b e e n the impo rta nc e o f the imple me nte d te c hno lo g y de ve lo pme nt, a dva nc e me nt, o r a pplic a tio n?  Wha t is the mo st impo rta nt ta ng ib le a nd ve rifia b le e vide nc e o f the No mine e ’ s c o ntrib utio ns inc luding , if a ppro pria te ?   Re le va nt sig nific a nt te c hnic a l pub lic a tio ns (pa te nts, re po rts, a rtic le s) a nd pre se nta tio ns?

Applic ation E ngine e r / Pr ac titione r (AE / P) - 3 E xample : Mr. Ande rsso n inve nte d a pro c e dure to ide ntify a nd lo c a te ho t spo ts in a tra nsfo rme r winding insula tio n. Suc h ho t spo ts o fte n o c c ur b e fo re tra nsfo rme r fa ilure . T he pro po se d pro c e dure ha s b e e n imple me nte d b y T ra nsfo rme rX I nc . I n the ir tra nsfo rme r mo nito ring e q uipme nt a nd ha s b e e n e mplo ye d c o nse q ue ntly b y se ve ra l le a ding utilitie s wo rldwide . I t is e stima te d tha t this pro c e dure ha s sa ve d utilitie s o ve r $500M b y ide ntifying tra nsfo rme rs re q uiring ma inte na nc e b e fo re the y fa ile d. Po ssib le e vide nc e : pa te nts, a rtic le s, c o nfe re nc e pre se nta tio ns, te c hnic a l re po rts, sta nda rds, c o mpa ny fina nc ia l sta te me nts, me dia re po rts .

E duc ator (E )  Wha t uniq ue a nd inno va tive c urric ula o r c o urse s ha s the No mine e pe rso na lly de ve lo pe d tha t ha ve influe nc e d te a c hing o utside the No mine e ’ s ho me institutio n? Wha t inno va tive a nd uniq ue c o ntrib utio ns ha s the No mine e ma de to e ng ine e ring e duc a tio n a s a n a dministra to r?  Ha s the No mine e writte n Wha t impa c t ha s the No mine e ’ s c o ntrib utio n ha d o n e duc a tio n in the fie ld o f inte re st o f the I E E E ?  A pio ne e ring te xt in his/ he r a re a s o f pro fe ssio na l spe c ia liza tio n?