draf t i mpact asse ssme nt st udy
play

DRAF T I MPACT ASSE SSME NT ST UDY Pre pa re d b y: Ma ze n - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DRAF T I MPACT ASSE SSME NT ST UDY Pre pa re d b y: Ma ze n Ha shwe h Pre se nte d to : QI F Bo a rd a nd PCU On: 21/ 12/ 2017 A. Study Ob je c tive B. T he Pro je c t C. T he Asse ssme nt D. Ma in F inding s E


  1. DRAF T I MPACT ASSE SSME NT ST UDY Pre pa re d b y: Ma ze n Ha shwe h Pre se nte d to : QI F Bo a rd a nd PCU On: 21/ 12/ 2017

  2.  A. Study Ob je c tive  B. T he Pro je c t  C. T he Asse ssme nt  D. Ma in F inding s  E . Ma in Re c o mme nda tio ns PRE SE NT AT I ON I T E MS

  3. A. ST UDY OBJE CT I VE A.1. Ove ra ll Ob je c tive A.2. Sub Ob je c tive s

  4.  F o c us o n a sse ssing the impa c t o f imple me nting the QI F pro je c ts o n  Asse ss the impa c t o f the 20 pro je c ts the pro je c ts’ ta rg e t g ro ups, the imple me nte d in T e rtia ry E duc a tio n la b o r ma rke t, the b e ne fic ia ry I nstitutio ns in the We st Ba nk a nd institutio n/ s pro g ra ms, pa rtne rs a nd Ga za unde r the Qua lity sta ff I mpro ve me nt F und c o mpo ne nt o f the T e rtia ry E duc a tio n Pro je c t o f the  Ge ne ra te re c o mme nda tio ns tha t E 2WT P – Cyc le 1 a nd 2 will c o ntrib ute to the impro ve me nt o f hig he r e duc a tio n A.1. OVE RAL L OBJE CT I VE

  5.  Asse ss pro c e dure s fo llo we d in  Ga the r fe e db a c k fro m ta rg e t imple me nting pro je c ts c o mmunitie s a nd pa rtic ipa ting T E I s a nd pa rtne rs a s to pe rc e ptio n, stre ng ths a nd  Asse ss dutie s a nd c o ntrib utio ns o f diffe re nt we a kne sse s o f the c o nduc te d pro je c ts. pa rtie s/ pa rtne rs  F a c ilita te a pro c e ss to c a pture le sso ns  Asse ss ro le o f QI F Bo a rd b y e xa mining the le a rne d. T his will he lp the PCU to re plic a te e ffic ie nc y o f the QI F Bo a rd po lic ie s a nd the g o o d wo rk a nd impro ve pro je c t pro c e dure s in disc ussing , a ppro ving a nd se rvic e de live ry. a wa rding sub mitte d QI F pro po sa ls  Ana lyze e xisting a nd po te ntia l  Asse ss impa c t o f e a c h individua l pro je c t o ppo rtunitie s fo r stre ng the ning pro je c t’ s o n pa rtic ipa ting institutio ns’ , ta rg e te d de live ry me c ha nism a nd g e ne ra ting pro g ra m, pa rtne ring institutio ns fo rm re c o mme nda tio ns tha t will c o ntrib ute to priva te se c to r; e nro lle d stude nts, the de ve lo pme nt o f imple me nting future g ra dua te s a nd/ o r o the r re le va nt QI F c yc le s sta ke ho lde rs A.2. SUB OBJE CT I VE S

  6. B. T HE PROJE CT B.1. Pro je c t Ob je c tive s B.2. Pro je c t De sc riptio n

  7. T he E 2WT P pro je c t is e xpe c te d to  On July 2, 2012, the Mo E HEre c e ive d a c o ntrib ute to : fina nc ia l suppo rt fro m the Wo rld Ba nk in the a mo unt o f 6.5 millio n USD unde r  Po ve rty re duc tio n the pro je c t “E duc a tio n to Wo rk  Re duc tio n o f so me o f the drive rs o f T ra nsitio n Pro je c t (E 2WT P)” c o nflic ts  T he ma in de ve lo pme nt g o a l o f the  I mpro ve d live liho o d pro spe c ts a nd pro je c t is to e nha nc e yo ung q ua lity o f life in the We st Ba nk a nd Pa le stinia n tra nsitio n fro m e duc a tio n Ga za . to wo rk thro ug h fo ste ring the linka g e s b e twe e n T e rtia ry E duc a tio n  T he Pa le stinia n Autho rity’ s (PA) I nstitutio ns (T E I s) a nd priva te se c to r stra te g y fo r the de ve lo pme nt o f a e mplo ye rs Pa le stinia n T VE T sub se c to r B.1. PROJE CT OBJE CT I VE S

  8. A ma jo r c o mpo ne nt o f the E 2WT P is the Qua lity I mpro ve me nt F und Gra nts (QI F ),  T he re a re 3,898 (3,080 fro m WB a nd b y whic h: 818 fro m GS) g ra dua te s tha t ha ve  A to ta l o f 20 g ra nts we re a wa rde d in b e ne fite d fro m the suppo rte d 2 c yc le s to suppo rt 20 (15WB & 5 GS) pro g ra ms fro m b o th c yc le s pro je c ts  T he numb e r o f g ra dua te s fro m c yc le  I mple me nte d in 16 diffe re nt (1) is 2,037 g ra dua te (1,512 fro m WB institutio ns (7 c o lle g e s, a nd 9 a nd 525 fro m GS) unive rsitie s), o f whic h, 2 unive rsitie s  T he numb e r o f g ra dua te s fro m c yc le a nd 2c o lle g e s a re lo c a te d in Ga za (2) is 1,861 g ra dua te (1,568 fro m WB Strip a nd 293 fro m GS)  An a mo unt o f 4,580,749.21 USD ha s b e e n c o mmitte d B.2. PROJE CT DE SCRI PT I ON

  9. Pro je c t c o mpo ne nts: T he 11 (o rig ina lly 12) pro je c ts suppo rte d in c yc le  Upda te d a nd re fo rme d c urric ula to me e t 1 we re in 6 a re a s o f a pplic a tio n, na me ly: re g io na l a nd inte rna tio na l sta nda rds;  1) F a shio n I ndustry; 2) I T a nd Co mpute r  T e ste d a nd imple me nte d mo difie d c urric ula ; Pro g ra mming ; 3) Co nsume r F o o d I ndustrie s  I nsta lle d la te st e q uipme nt a nd re so urc e s; a nd Pro duc tio n; 4) Busine ss Pro fe ssio na l a nd L a b o ur Org a niza tio ns; 5) Co mmunic a tio ns  Ope ra te d la b s a nd c e nte rs; a nd Me dia Studie s, a nd; 6) Pha rma c e utic a l  T Sc ie nc e , He a lth Ca re , He a lth E duc a tio n, a nd ra ine d sta ff a nd pa rtne rs a nd e xpo se d the m to inte rna tio na l e xpe rie nc e thro ug h the So c ia l Se rvic e s. imple me nte d study to urs; T he 9 pro je c ts suppo rte d in c yc le 2 we re in 3  I a re a s o f a pplic a tio n, na me ly: ntro duc e d ne w te a c hing me tho do lo g ie s a nd a ppro a c he s;  1) T o urism Ho spita lity a nd Arc he o lo g y; 2)  Ca rrie d o ut so ft a nd te c hnic a l skills tra ining s Ag ric ultura l E ng ine e ring , E nviro nme nt, a nd F o o d Pro duc tio n, a nd; 3) E nviro nme nt to stude nts. E ng ine e ring , a nd T ra nspo rta tio n Se rvic e s.  Re vie we d inte rnship pro c e ss a nd jo b pla c e me nt. B.2. PROJE CT DE SCRI PT I ON

  10. C. T HE ASSE SSME NT C.1. Appro a c h a nd Me tho do lo g y C.2. So urc e s o f I nfo rma tio n

  11.  Co nduc te d fie ld visits to a ll T E I s in WB  Utilize d a va rie ty o f to o ls, e nsuring tha t  Co nduc te d skype inte rvie ws with a ll T E I s the pro c e ss is a s pa rtic ipa to ry a nd in GS inc lusive a s po ssib le  Me t with o the r ke y sta ke ho lde rs a nd  He ld intro duc to ry me e ting with QI F info rma nts (c o nsiste ntly with PCU, QI F PCU Bo a rd, Wo rld Ba nk, Mo E HE , a nd o the rs)  Co nduc te d lite ra ture re vie w  Ac q uire d upda te d PCBS a nd o the r re le va nt da ta a nd sta tistic s  De ve lo pe d a na lysis fra me wo rk, q ue stio nna ire s, inte rvie w g uide line s,  Ana lyze d q ua ntita tive a nd q ua lita tive a nd o the r re se a rc h to o ls da ta g a the re d  De ve lo pe d de ta ile d inc e ptio n re po rt  Pre se nte d to QI F Bo a rd, a nd the n to T E I s C.1. APPROACH AND ME T HODOL OGY

  12. Qua lita tive Ana lysis Qua ntita tive Ana lysis  Visite d a ll T E I s in the We st Ba nk e xc e pt  T ra c e d a ll g ra dua te s who ha ve fo r o ne ; I nte rvie we d a ll T E I s in Ga za b e ne fitte d fully fro m pro je c t o ve r Skype inte rve ntio ns  I nte rvie we d in to ta l 245 pe rso n a t T E I s  T he se a re ma inly the 2016-2017  208 WB a nd 37 GS g ra dua te s who ha ve g ra dua te d o ne ye a r a g o a nd ha ve b e e n e xpo se d  102 te a c hing sta ff a nd ma na g e me nt; fully to pro je c t a c tivitie s 37 e mplo ye rs a nd pa rtne rs; a nd 106 stude nts a nd g ra dua te s  97% (401 o ut o f 412) g ra dua te s o f the  I nte rvie we d o the r ke y info rma nts: QI F ye a r 2016/ 2017 re spo nde d Bo a rd; PCU, Wo rld Ba nk, .. C.2. SOURCE S OF I NF ORMAT I ON

  13. D. MAI N F I NDI NGS D.1. I mpa c t o n Stude nts a nd Gra dua te s D.2. I mpa c t o n T E I s D.3. I mpa c t o n Pa rtne rs a nd L a b o r Ma rke t I nstitutio ns D.4. I mpa c t o n So c ie ty a nd o n Hig he r E duc a tio n Syste m D.5. Asse ssme nt o f pro c e dure s fo llo we d in imple me nting the pro je c ts

  14. Pe rc e nta g e Une mployme nt Se lf E mployme nt  61% Pa le stine ; 52% WB; 79% GS  23% o f E mplo ye d; 18% WB; 44% GS  Ra ng e : 0% (I SC) - 100% (PT CDB)  44% I T Gra dua te s; 8% He a lth Gra ds  31% Co lle g e Gra ds; 74% Univ. Gra ds  53% Dipl. Gra ds; 62% Ba c h. Gra ds Work in F ie ld of Study  12% Me dia ; 16% He a lth; 41% I T ; 83%  T o ta l 80%; 97% He a lth Gra ds; 43% Busine ss; 87% F o o d I ndustry; 100% Me dia Gra ds F a shio n De sig n  42% Ma le s in WB; 92% F e ma le s in GS Continuing Hig he r E duc a tion  69% o f Une mplo ye d Ha ve No t  T o ta l 5% Wo rke d At All Sinc e Gra dua tio n D.1. I MPACT ON ST UDE NT S & GRADUAT E S – E MPL OYME NT SUMMARY OF RE SUL T S F OR GRADUAT E S 1 YE AR AF T E R GRADUAT I ON

  15. Compa rison to Ba sle ine  Une mplo yme nt Amo ng Pro g ra m Une mployme nt Cha ng e in Pa le stine Gra dua te s Co mpa re d in Q3 2017 T o  Be twe e n 2013 a nd Q3 2017, Yo uth Ag e d (20-24) Ye a rs Ho lding Une mplo yme nt Amo ng Yo uth Ag e d An Asso c ia te Diplo ma a nd Ab o ve in (20-24) Ye a rs Of Ag e s I nc re a se d By: 2013 De c re a se d By:  5.6% in T o ta l  4.1% fo r Bo th Se xe s in Pa le stine  1.6% WB; 9.2% GS  1.4% Ma le s; 7.7% F e ma le s  2.8% Ma le s; 6.7% F e ma le s  1.3% WB; 0.6% GS D.1. I MPACT ON ST UDE NT S & GRADUAT E S – E MPL OYME NT SUMMARY OF RE SUL T S F OR GRADUAT E S 1 YE AR AF T E R GRADUAT I ON

Recommend


More recommend