Presented to: Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee Presented by: Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. Presentation Date: June 25, 2014
AGENDA • Transit Development Plan Overview • Miami-Dade Transit Overview • Peer Analysis • Outreach Activities • MDT10Ahead Survey Results • Next Steps 2
Purpose of the Transit Development Plan • Florida Statute requires that Miami-Dade Transit prepare a Transit Development Plan (TDP) to qualify for the State Public Transit Grant Program. • A TDP Major Update is completed every five years and updated annually. – For 2014, Miami-Dade Transit’s TDP is a Major Update • Serves as MDT’s strategic development, and operational guidance document for a 10-year planning horizon. • The TDP is coordinated with other county plans and stakeholder input is gathered for TDP development. 3
Transit Development Plan Sections • Overview of Miami-Dade Transit –MDT’s Accomplishments •Capital Improvements •Service Operations •Customer Information/Convenience • Existing Conditions –Peer Review –Trend Analysis (5-years) • Operating Environmen t –Land Use –Socio-economic characteristics 4
Transit Development Plan Sections • Identify TDP Goals and Objectives • Situation Appraisal –Transit propensity • Ten Year Implementation Program (2015 – 2024) –Capital Improvements –Operating Service Improvements –Transit Needs • Financial Plan (2015 – 2024) –Capital/Operating Budget –Funded (constrained) and Unfunded (unconstrained) projects –Funding Sources 5
Miami-Dade Transit Overview • 15 th Largest Transit System in the U.S. – Service Area - 306 miles – Urbanized population of 2.5 million – Four Modes • Metrobus – 93 routes; 8,828 stations/stops; 824 buses » Busway: ~20 miles exclusive lanes • Metrorail – 24.8 miles; 23 stations; 136 vehicles • Metromov – 4.4 miles; 21 stations; 46 vehicles • Special T – 380 vehicles 6
Miami-Dade Transit Overview • FY 2013 111 Million Annual Total Boardings • 353,000 Average Weekday Boardings • Multimodal Connections: – Tri-Rail – Broward County Transit • Farebox Recovery Ratio 28% 7
MDT’s Planned Capital and Service Improvements •Service Improvements •Capital Improvements – Transit Hubs – Park-and-Rides •Transit Corridors – Enhanced Bus Service •Passenger Convenience – Transit Tracker 8
MDT Performance Indicator Trends (2007 – 2012) 9
Peer Agencies Special Metrobus Metrorail Metromover Transportation Agency Location Service (STS) Heavy Automated Paratransit/Demand Bus Rail Guideway Response Broward County Transit Division (BCT) PEER Pompano Beach, FL Jacksonville Transportation Authority (JTA) PEER PEER Jacksonville, FL King County Department of Transportation (King County Metro) PEER Seattle, WA Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) PEER PEER Boston, MA Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) PEER PEER PEER Philadelphia, PA Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) PEER PEER Washington, DC Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) PEER PEER PEER Baltimore, MD Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) PEER PEER Atlanta, GA The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (GCRTA) PEER PEER PEER Cleveland, OH Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) PEER PEER Chicago, IL Detroit Transportation Corporation (DTC) PEER Detroit, MI Metropolitan Transit Authority - Harris County (MTA Harris County) Houston, TX PEER 10
Bus Peer Comparison Route Miles and Passenger Trips Mean Mean 11
Bus Peer Comparison Vehicle Revenue Hours and Operating Cost Per Trip Mean Mean Mean 12
Bus Peer Comparison Operating Expense and Farebox Recovery Mean Mean 13
Rail Peer Comparison Route Miles and Passenger Trips Mean Mean 14
Rail Peer Comparison Vehicle Revenue Hours and Operating Cost Per Trip Mean Mean Mean 15
Rail Peer Comparison Operating Expense and Farebox Recovery Mean Mean 16
Automated Guideway Peer Comparison Route Miles and Passenger Trips Mean Mean 17
Automated Guideway Peer Comparison Vehicle Revenue Hours and Operating Cost Per Trip Mean Mean 18
Automated Guideway Peer Comparison Operating Expense Mean 19
Stakeholder Involvement and Public Outreach •MDT10Ahead Survey http://www.miamidade.gov/transit/mdt-10-ahead.asp •MDT10Ahead Mini Survey •Social Media Outlets •Special Outreach Events •County Public Meetings •Transportation and Aviation Committee (TAC) Public Hearing •Board of County Commissioners (BCC) 20
MDT10Ahead Survey Results Survey Number Type Completed Public – English 629 Public – Spanish 14 Employee 24 Mini-Survey 788 Total 1,455 The number of respondents per question may vary. As of June 20, 2014 10
Ridership 120% 120 100% 100 32% 32% 80% 80% 38% 38% 69% 69% 60% 60% 12% 12% 94% 94% 10% 10% 28% 28% 40% 40% 12% 12% 9% 9% 45% 45% 20% 20% 6% 6% 22% 22% 16% 16% 2% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 3% 3% Metrorail Metrobus Metrobus STS Busway More than 4 times per week 1-3 times per week A few times per month Rarely or never 11
Ten-Year Priorities 120% 120 100% 100 4% 4% 8% 8% 13% 13% 15% 15% 14% 14% 16% 16% 19% 19% 80% 80% 21% 21% 25% 25% 19% 19% 30% 30% 29% 29% 60% 60% 28% 28% 28% 28% 40% 40% 81% 81% 69% 69% 65% 65% 51% 51% 51% 51% 48% 48% 20% 20% 37% 37% 0% 0% On-Time On me Early/ Ear y/La Late e Frequen Fr equent Weeke eekend nd Serve Ser ve New New Si Simpl pler er Fewer Fewer Ser Servi vice Ser Servi vice Servi Ser vice Areas Ar eas Routes Routes Stops Stops Ver ery i impor portant ant Som omewhat i what impor portant ant Neutr Ne utral Not No t impor portant tant 12
Why Ride Transit? 120% 120 100% 100 8% 8% 8% 8% 7% 7% 13% 13% 15% 15% 80% 80% 24% 24% 10% 10% 20% 20% 20% 20% 22% 22% 24% 24% 23% 23% 17% 17% 60% 60% 24% 24% 40% 40% 68% 68% 68% 68% 66% 66% 57% 57% 57% 57% 56% 56% 45% 45% 20% 20% 0% 0% Can an do do Saves es Tak Takes me e Good od for or Healthi hier er Saves es Conveni enient nt Other her Things ngs Money ney wher here I want ant Environm onment nt Tim ime (Read) ad) to o go go Str trongl ongly agr agree ee Som omewhat agr what agree ee Ne Neutr utral Disagr Di agree 13
MDT’s Service Rating Excellent Poor 6% 16% Excellent Very good Very good Good 23% Average Average 24% Poor Good 31% 14
Upcoming Schedule • Stakeholder input, review, and comment period (January - July 2014) • Public review and comment period (February - July 2014) • Draft Transit Development Plan (July 2014) • Finalize Draft Transit Development Plan (August 2014) • Submit Transit Development Plan to FDOT for review and approval by September 1 st • Present to TAC on November 12 th • Present to BCC on November 18 th 26
Recommend
More recommend
