ccsf facilities master plan
play

CCSF FACILITIES MASTER PLAN Management Team September 16, 2016 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CCSF FACILITIES MASTER PLAN Management Team September 16, 2016 1 PLANNING TEAM tBP /Architecture Phil Newsom Architect, LEED AP Principal-in-Charge, Project Manager Amy Jane Frater AICP, LEED AP Educational Facilities Planner 2 AGENDA


  1. CCSF FACILITIES MASTER PLAN Management Team September 16, 2016 1

  2. PLANNING TEAM tBP /Architecture Phil Newsom Architect, LEED AP Principal-in-Charge, Project Manager Amy Jane Frater AICP, LEED AP Educational Facilities Planner 2

  3. AGENDA • Purpose and Process • Findings of Needs Assessment • Discussion: Organizational Philosophy • Next Steps 3

  4. PURPOSE & PROCESS 4

  5. PURPOSE OF THE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN Provides a roadmap for facilities improvement, renovation, replacement, and new construction based on the Education Master Plan. • Build a 21 st century community college that meets the needs of students today & tomorrow. • Create a flexible, living strategy that is driven by educational vision. • Modernize CCSF facilities to serve for the next 10 years and beyond. • Include our community in the decision-making process. • Fulfill Accreditation requirements for facilities planning. 5

  6. 2014 CCSF EDUCATION MASTER PLAN GOAL 1: Advance student achievement in meeting educational goals. GOAL 2: Transform and sustain College infrastructure. GOAL 3: Provide new and expanded opportunities for organizational development and effective innovation. 6

  7. Facility Master Plan (FMP) is the basis for: • Facilities Budgeting • 5-Year Construction Plans • State Funding Proposals (IPP/FPPs) • Campus Standards • Bond Planning • Project Schedules • Project Planning & Design 7

  8. PLANNING PROCESS & SCHEDULE 8

  9. www.ccsf.edu/fmp • Project information • Sign-up for mailing list • Address to submit comments 9

  10. Phase 1 Needs - FINDINGS • Issues • Facilities Condition Index • Space Needs Analysis • Goals 10

  11. FACILITIES ISSUES • District-wide • Ocean Campus • More Locations 11

  12. DISTRICT-WIDE ISSUES • Positives • Students First • Re-imagine the campus at each location as a learning environment. • Every program should have a home. • Core student services need a consistent brand at each location. • Collegiate space at each location. • Some facilities are outdated. • Flexible tech-rich multi-use educational environments rather than just ‘computer labs.’ • Take more advantage of opportunities to pool facilities – more bang for the buck. 12

  13. OCEAN CAMPUS ISSUES • Inefficient Organization • Outdated Facilities • Circulation Conflicts • Safety • Need Study Space • Need High Tech Space • Need Community Space • Neighborhood Integration • Balboa Reservoir

  14. Fort Mason Site (Civic Center) • Inefficient Layout CENTERS • Need Study Space ISSUES Civic Center • Neighborhood Security • No Collegiate Space John Adams • Underutilized Space • Better Outdoor Space Mission • Underutilized Space Airport • Outdated Space • No Collegiate Space

  15. Chinatown/North Beach • Underutilized Space CENTERS, • Unused Café DISTRICT Downtown OFFICES • Outdated Space • Inefficient Space ISSUES • Need Collegiate, Study Space • Neighborhood Security Gough Street District Offices • Vacate Evans • Outdated Layout Southeast • Outdated Space • Underutilized Space • Inactive Space • Need Collegiate Space

  16. Chinatown/ North Beach • Underutilized Space CENTERS, • Unused Café DISTRICT Downtown OFFICES • Outdated Space • Inefficient Space ISSUES • Need Collegiate, Study Space • Neighborhood Security Gough Street District Offices • Vacate Evans • Outdated Layout Southeast • Outdated Space • Underutilized Space • Inactive Space • Need Collegiate Space

  17. 2012 FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI) • Compares Cost of Repair to Cost of Replacement • Prepared by State Chancellor’s Office 17

  18. 18

  19. 19

  20. SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Develop a strategy for “Good Space – Right Space” per state standards for space. 20

  21. EXISTING CAPACITY LOAD RATIOS Source: CCSF 2015 Space Inventory, CCSF Five Year Construction Plan Campus Lecture Labs Office Library/ AVTV/ Study Instructional Media Ocean 179% 114% 120% 85% 54% More Locations 253% 194% 77% 52% 105% <100% means ‘need more space’ >110% means ‘too much space’

  22. ENROLLMENT FORECAST Source: 2015 State Forecast of Enrollment & WSCH for Facilities Planning Year Enrollment FTES WSCH (Fall) (Fall) (Fall) 2014 46,734 23,147 347,208 ACTUAL (State) 2020 58,413 32,750 491,252 NEAR TERM (State) 2026 73,055 41,739 626,080 LONG TERM (State) 2008 67,485 36,775 551,630 HIGHEST ACTUAL(State) 22

  23. SPACE NEEDS – Ocean Campus 2026-27 Source: CCSF Enrollment Data, 2015 State Forecast of Enrollment & WSCH, CCSF Five Year Construction Plan, 2015 Space Inventory (Adjusted) OCEAN HAVE NEED DIFFERENCE (= Have - Need) Type of Space 2015 Space Need Ocean Inventory Ocean ASF ASF ASF 2,600 Unprogrammed 2,600 0 12,000 Classroom 118,900 107,000 63,100 Labs 163,900 100,800 17,700 Office 120,200 102,500 -47,500 Library/Study 81,600 129,100 -17,400 AVTV Instructional Media 18,900 36,300 30,500 23 Total Cap Load ASF 506,100 475,700

  24. SPACE NEEDS – Centers 2026-27 Source: CCSF Enrollment Data, 2015 State Forecast of Enrollment & WSCH, CCSF Five Year Construction Plan, 2015 Space Inventory (Adjusted) CENTERS HAVE NEED DIFFERENCE (= Have - Need) Type of Space 2015 Centers Space Need ASF Inventory Centers ASF ASF 22,400 Unprogrammed 22,400 0 21,900 Classroom 109,100 87,200 105,000 Labs 181,500 76,500 -11,600 Office 76,900 88,500 -51,900 Library/Study 27,200 79,100 -12,200 AVTV Instructional Media 4,100 16,300 73,500 Total Cap Load ASF 421,100 347,600 24

  25. Facilities Master Plan Goals

  26. FACILITIES MASTER PLAN GOALS Draft by FMP Working Group 053116 Our first principle is to serve students with what is most important to them: community and technology. These elements are becoming inextricably intertwined. The entire physical environment of each campus can be a learning environment. The physical environments of District locations should be developed around this principle. We want to move toward a future when we no longer plan for technology as a special feature, it will become part of the baseline of facilities development. There are many types of community: learning, social, formal, informal. We will plan facilities that encourage more interaction in study, academics, outside of class with peers/faculty/staff/mentors, group study, and socialization around academics. Technology is assumed, ubiquitous. Technology and community are redundant (no longer needed, superfluous), not separate.

  27. FACILITIES MASTER PLAN GOALS Draft by FMP Working Group 053116 EMP 1 EMP 2 EMP 3 Student College Institutional GOAL Achievement Infrastructure Innovation 1. Students first. X 2. Create an environment that promotes the “whole” student and promotes well-being. X X 3. Create spaces that promote collaborative social and community learning. X X 4. Create spaces that promote collaborative social learning. X X 5. Create facilities that support and develop a sense of community X X 6. Create spaces for formal and informal study for individuals and groups. X X X 7. Develop a one-stop shop for first contact Student Services. X X 8. Second contact services location to support students where they are. X X

  28. FACILITIES MASTER PLAN GOALS Draft by FMP Working Group 053116 EMP 1 EMP 2 EMP 3 Student College Institutional GOAL Achievement Infrastructure Innovation 9. Develop facilities that create a convenient ‘flow’ between related Student Development/Student Services functions. X X 10. Provide appropriate space for support services at all District locations. X X X 11. Provide appropriate space for support staff. X X X 12. Provide spaces that support instruction and support services appropriately and equitably. X X X 13. Provide a venue for all-College events. X X 14. Provide good space that is right-sized and fits the College enrollment. X X X 15. Commitment to a high quality of design for new and older X spaces/buildings.

  29. FACILITIES MASTER PLAN GOALS Draft by FMP Working Group 053116 EMP 1 EMP 2 EMP 3 Student College Institutional GOAL Achievement Infrastructure Innovation 16. Provide intuitive wayfinding and better signage. X X 17. Provide universally accessible design. X X X 18. Provide facilities that are sustainable and maintainable. X 19. Develop an aesthetically pleasing, collegiate environment at each X location. 20. Ensure feelings of personal and educational safety. X X 21. Use Total Cost of Ownership analysis to develop facilities that are cost effective to construct and maintain. X 22. Plan for near-term improvements that will improve facilities to support instruction and support services during implementation of long-range X X X plans.

  30. FACILITIES MASTER PLAN GOALS Draft by FMP Working Group 053116 More goals drafted 082916: EMP 1 EMP 2 EMP 3 Student College Institutional GOAL Achievement Infrastructure Innovation 23. Develop safe pathways within every District location, and between each X campus and its surrounding community. 24. Improve access between each campus and the surrounding community X for all transportation modes, such as pedestrians, bicycles, transit and vehicles. 25. Continue to accommodate vehicles at the Ocean Campus. X

  31. ORGANIZATIONAL PHILOSOPHY

Recommend


More recommend