c c group
play

C&C Group Paul Gregory, Service Delivery Manager June 11, 2014 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

competitive advantage through technology C&C Group Paul Gregory, Service Delivery Manager June 11, 2014 competitive advantage through technology C&C Group The scope of this years audit Scope of Audit Inspection visits undertaken in


  1. competitive advantage through technology C&C Group Paul Gregory, Service Delivery Manager June 11, 2014

  2. competitive advantage through technology C&C Group The scope of this year’s audit

  3. Scope of Audit Inspection visits undertaken in this audit year • 1,257 SVA HHMSs • 1,254 – Main sample • 1 – Re-inspections • 2 – Targeted inspections • 50 CVA HHMSs • 50 – Main sample There was no Specific Sample this year

  4. Cancellations 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 SVA Cancellations CVA Cancellations

  5. No Access 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 CVA No Access SVA No Access

  6. LDSO Attendance • A review of this year’s findings indicates that the change to BSCP27 to improve access to remote equipment doesn’t appear to be being met. • We estimate that we were unable to access remote CT and VT rating plates for approximately 50 of the SVA visits undertaken this year. • We recommend that the PAB formally write to parties reminding them of their obligation in relation to this activity.

  7. competitive advantage through technology C&C Group The Health of the Market

  8. Health of HH Market SVA GOOD NEWS • The health of the SVA HHMS population appears to be improving with a reduction in Category 1 non- compliances recorded this year. • Category 1 non-compliances recorded have reduced from 26 last year to 16 this year. • We have noted a significant reduction in major timing issues this year.

  9. Health of HH Market SVA GOOD NEWS (cont.) • 1.3% of the SVA HHMS sampled recorded a Category 1 non-compliance, although the material impact on Settlement has reduced from 35,262 MWh last year to 6,973 MWh this year. • All Category 1 non-compliances recorded this year have now been rectified.

  10. Health of HH Market SVA BAD NEWS • CT/VT ratio Meter programming non-compliances are increasing year on year. • 71% of HHMS audited had no evidence of or incomplete commissioning.  There are commissioning issues for all HHMS where we have recorded a Category 1 non- compliance.

  11. Health of HH Market SVA BAD NEWS (cont.) • The average rectification timescales for Category 1 non-compliances have increased from 19 days last year to 25 days this year. • Two Category 1 non-compliances remain unresolved from last year.

  12. Health of HH Market CVA GOOD NEWS • Commissioning non-compliances have reduced from 40 last year to 32 this year. • All CDC checks undertaken returned no issues.

  13. Health of HH Market CVA BAD NEWS • The overall count of Category 1 non-compliances has increased by 50% since 2007. • Two Category 1 non-compliances have been recorded this year. One has a material impact on Settlement of 37,531.30 MWh. This NC has yet to be rectified. • The average count of Category 2 non-compliances recorded per visit has increased again this year.

  14. competitive advantage through technology C&C Group Key Issues

  15. Key Issues COMMISSIONING • Lack of commissioning evidence remains a concern. • Though we can’t say commissioning is not being completed evidence suggests the following failings:  The quality of records are judged unacceptable and therefore not submitted for review.  Documentation not readily retrievable for review.  Parties are not fully complying with BSCP27 in terms of provision of commissioning for review.

  16. Key Issues Percentage of HHMS visited with lack of or incomplete commissioning records 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 SVA CVA

  17. Key Issues Commissioning • We are seeing no improvement with commissioning and expect to continue to record non-compliances • We are aware that commissioning changes mandated by Modification Proposal P283 shall be implemented in November this year.  A measure of the impact of P283 on commissioning could be reviewed by conducting a repeat Specific Sample similar to that of last year that looks at newly registered metering systems post November 2014.

  18. Key Issues SVA Category 1.04 CT programming non-compliances 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 Raised

  19. Key Issues Measurement Transformer Certificates • The numbers of Category 2.16 non-compliances being recorded remains high year on year. • Last year we encouraged the development of the NMTES via the process available in BSCP515.  To date, we have seen no new additions to the NMTES and would continue to recommend that this document be developed sooner rather than later.

  20. competitive advantage through technology C&C Group This Year’s Audit Findings

  21. Audit Findings SVA Main Sample Category 1 - Non-Compliances 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1.01 MTD Error 1.02 ME Failure 1.03 Clock 1.04 1.06 Timing Transformer Miscellaneous Ratio Error

  22. Audit Findings CVA Category 1 Non-Compliance Summary • We identified two Category 1 non-compliances this year, both down to ME failure • One non-compliance (unresolved) reported a 37,531.30MWh materiality.

  23. Audit Findings Category 1 Non-Compliances - Rectification • All SVA reported non-compliance resolved • The two CVA Category 1 non-compliances identified this year have followed two distinct separate paths when it comes to rectification. a. ME failure amounting to a VT LV fuse interruption, resolved in 37days. b. ME CT failure is unresolved and has been outstanding for in excess of 150 days.

  24. Audit Findings • SVA CDCC Accuracy Rate 100% 99% 98% 97% 96% 95% 94% 93% 92% 91% 90% 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 Compliant Non-compliant • CVA CDCC Accuracy Rate last 5 years – 100% compliant

  25. Audit Findings SVA Main Sample Category 2 Non-Compliances 1000 800 600 400 200 0

  26. Audit Findings SVA Main Sample Category 2 Non-Compliances Summary • 2,451 Category 2 non-compliances were recorded this year. • The average Category 2 non-compliances identified per inspection is in line with last year at 2.1. • The highest frequency of non-compliances relate to calibration certificates, overall accuracy limits exceeded and missing/incomplete commissioning records. • Commissioning shows no improvement from last year.

  27. Audit Findings • CVA Category 2 Non-Compliances 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

  28. competitive advantage through technology C&C Group Any Questions?

Recommend


More recommend