BLPC #8 Meeting BLPC #8 Meeting McKinley Elementary School - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BLPC #8 Meeting BLPC #8 Meeting McKinley Elementary School McKinley Elementary School Renovation + Renovation + Addition Addition Decem December 17, 20 ber 17, 2013 13 1

Tonight’s Discussion : UPDATE TOOLE UPDATE PRECEDENT IMAGES CONCEPT DESIGN Building Exterior Schedule Option 1 Site / Landscape Option 2 Building favorites Option 3.a Option 3.b Discussion Selection 2

3 SCHEDULE 01

SCHEDULE : 01 PROJECT MILESTONES: • Concept Design Submission to APS Board ‐ Information – Jan 23, 2014 • Construction Documents – November 30, 2014 • Concept Design Submission to APS Board ‐ Approval – Feb 6, 2014 • Building Permit – January 30, 2015 • Schematic Design – March 25, 2014 • Bidding – March 4, 2015 • Design Development – June 30, 2014 • Construction – June 2015 • Use Permit – September 2014 • Occupancy – September 2016 4

SCHEDULE : September October November December January February March 18 16 20 18 15 19 PFRC 11 24 8 22 5 19 4 17 14 28 11 25 11 BLPC 10 4 3 PTA 23 6 16 25 19 6 20 APS BD Site Review Program Review Concept Design Schematic Design 5

6 Toole Design Group Update

Arlington Public Schools McKinley Elementary School Transportation Recommendations SAN ANTONIO ‐ BEXAR COUNTY PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ACTION PLAN

• 7 field visits • Surveys of staff, students, parents, and visitors (April 2013, October 2013) • Automated traffic recorder, video, and manual counts • Assessment of parking occupancy • Feedback from McKinley SRTS Team, PTA, BLPC, PFRC

• Parking • On ‐ campus infrastructure • Off ‐ campus infrastructure – McKinley Road/Ohio Street – Potomac Street • Arrival and dismissal procedures • Student and parent travel to/from school • Staff and visitor travel to/from school

• 60 on ‐ site parking spaces – 3x the projected increase in peak hour staff and visitors – Will reduce the number of staff and visitors who currently park off ‐ site • Recommendation less than zoning requirement; APS must request waiver.

Existing Cross Section Recommended Cross Section

McKinley Potomac & 9th & 11th IMPROVING CONDITIONS FOR WALKING AND BICYCLING PLANNING STUDY

15 “Brown-paper” Exercise

• THIS COMES CLOSER THAN MOST TO FITTING WITH • LIKE LANDSCAPING. THE POST WAR (WWII), BRICK CONSTRUCTION OF • LIKE BRICK, AND STILL GOOD LIGHT. THE NEIGHBORHOOD. • YAY, GARDEN! CAN GARDEN BECOME YEAR ROUND, • MOST SUITS THE NEIGHBORHOOD. COMMUNITY SPACE? • LIKE THE OVERALL SCALE AND BRICKWORK. • NICE SEATING, THIS FEELS LIKE A MASONRY STYLE THAT • YES – LIKE THE BRICK, BUT TOO INSTITUTIONAL. WOULD BLEND NICELY WITH EXISTING STRUCTURE. WHERE ARE THE TREES? • THIS IS THE NICEST LOOKING EXTERIOR THAT FITS THE • FITS THE NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT TOO FLAT. NEIGHBORHOOD AND GIVES LOTS OF NATURAL LIGHT. 16

• WOOD/LANDSCAPING MAKE ENTRY FEEL VERY NOT • I LIKE THIS ONE. I LIKED THE MIXED MEDIUMS. REAL. • LIKE THE WOOD (?) LOOK. • NICE LANDSCAPING. • NICE SKY! • LOVE IT. AMAZING LANDSCAPE AND SO NOT BOXY! 17

• YES TO NATURAL LIGHT FOR KIDS! • GLAD THERE’S LIGHTING. • LIKE THE USE OF WOOD. • COOL. • AMAZING. • WHO WASHES THESE WINDOWS? • SO MAJESTIC AND FANCY. • LOOKS LIKE A FACTORY. • OK. • I LIKE ALL OF THE CHAIRS INSIDE. 18

• NICE MIX. • VERY CLASSY SIGN OUT FRONT. • NICE DESIGN – PRESERVES BRICK COLOR AND FEEL OF • STAIRS REMIND ME OF OUR NATURAL GRADING. NEIGHBORHOOD. • YES! THIS IS THE FEEL OF MADISON MANOR! TRADITIONALLY RED BRICK COLONIAL !! THIS SCHOOL IS THE CENTER OF A NEIGHBORHOOD! • LOOKS LIKE A COLLEGE. VERY TALL. TOO TALL FOR US. • LIKE USE OF BRICK, BUT FEELS SO GENERIC. • THIS FEELS CLOSE TO MCKINLEY’S STYLE. • WE ARE GOING TO COLLEGE. 19

• I LIKE THIS ONE, IT IS NOT IMPOSING. • I LIKE THE OVERHANG TO PROTECT THE ENTRANCE • WEEDS! FROM ELEMENTS. 20

• NICE TIERED LANDSCAPING. • I LIKE IT. • I LIKE THE TIERED LANDSCAPE – GOOD WAY TO MAXIMIZE GRADE. • GOOD USE OF THE HILL. 21

• PRETTY, I LIKE THE GREEN SPACE. • HAS A NICE FEEL. • NICE GREEN SPACE. • NICE USE OF TERRACING FOR GREEN SPACE. • GOOD FOR OUTDOOR LEARNING. • GREAT OUTDOOR SPACE FOR MULTI ‐ PURPOSE, AND USES THE GRADE. • NICE AREA, IT LOOKS AMAZING AND BOSS! • BEST PLAYING FIELD. • WOULD BE EXCELLENT SEATING FOR SOCCER/BASEBALL FIELD WHERE TRAILERS ARE NOW. • SEE THE AVBOREIUM AMPHITHEATER WITH TREES AT SWATHMORE. AVOID SLOPE/STONE SEATS/RANDOM TREES. SHADE/LIGHT/VISIBILITY. 22

• GREAT IDEA, BUT HIGH MAINTENANCE? • MORE NATURAL AND INDIGENEOUS PLANTS/TREES. • I LIKE THIS SPACE. • LOVE THIS. EASY TO MAINTAIN. COULD ALSO WORK • MORE OF THIS. BEES ON THE ROOF. INTO CURRICULUM. • LOVE CLASSROOM GARDENS. • NICE IDEA. SHOW ME THE MONEY TO KEEP IT. • LOVE THIS! 23

• I LIKE HOW THE SMALL GROUP SPACE IS OPEN TO AND • WE DON’T GARDEN AT MCKINLEY! INTEGRATED WITH THE LARGE GROUP SPACE. • YES, GREAT WAY TO HELP CHILDREN UNDERSTAND • YES, SMALL GROUP SPACE. THAT FOOD COMES FROM THESE ENVIRONMENTS. • CHAIRS = NO. BENCHES = YES. NOT JUST THE GROCERY STORE. • WOOD IS NOT SUSTAINABLE AFTER EXPOSURE TO • NICE. I LIKE THE NATURAL FEEL. ELEMENTS. • NICE TIERED GARDEN, GOOD USE OF SPACE. • GREAT GREEN SPACE AND NATURAL GATHERING SPOT. • NICE, BUT THIS IS THE SCHOOL OF THE ARTS. SHOULD HAVE AN ARTS EMPHASIS. 24

• WHERE DOES THIS GO? UP IN THE WOODS BEHIND • YES, USE NATURE TO SUPPORT STEM AND STEAM. SCHOOL? • THIS IS GREAT – LOTS OF PLACES TO EXPLORE AND BE • YES, NATURAL MATERIALS. PART OF NATURE. • SAND AND MULCH – UGH. I AM FOREVER PICKING MULCH OUT OF KIDS SHOES AND CLOTHES. 25

Concept Concept Desi Design: gn: Opt Option on Refi Refinem nement nt 26

Concept Design : 01 OPTION 1 – SITE PLAN 27

Concept Design : OPTION 1 – FLOOR PLANS 01 Existing School: 57,400 sf Minor Renovation: 30,400 sf Major Renovation: 20,000 sf N Demolition: 7,000 sf New Construction: 37,000 sf Total – Option 1: 87,400 sf 28

29 Concept Design : OPTION 1 – NE AERIAL PERSPECTIVE 01

Concept Design : OPTION 1 – SE AERIAL PERSPECTIVE 01 30

Concept Design : OPTION 1 – ELEVATIONS 01 EAST SOUTH 31

32 MCKINLEY RD. 60’ FROM OPTION 2 – SITE PLAN Concept Design : 01

Concept Design : OPTION 2 – FLOOR PLANS 01 Existing School: 57,400 sf Minor Renovation: 30,400 sf Major Renovation: 20,000 sf N Demolition: 7,000 sf New Construction: 38,000 sf Total – Option 2: 88,400 sf 33

Concept Design : OPTION 2 – NE AERIAL PERSPECTIVE 01 34

Concept Design : OPTION 2 – SE AERIAL PERSPECTIVE 01 35

Concept Design : OPTION 2 – ELEVATIONS 01 EAST NORTH SOUTH 36

37 OPTION 3.a – SITE PLAN Concept Design : 01

Concept Design : OPTION 3.a – FLOOR PLANS 01 Existing School: 57,400 sf Minor Renovation: 30,400 sf Major Renovation: 20,000 sf N Demolition: 7,000 sf New Construction: 37,000 sf Total – Option 1: 87,400 sf 38

39 Concept Design : OPTION 3.a – NE AERIAL PERSPECTIVE 01

40 Concept Design : OPTION 3.a – SE AERIAL PERSPECTIVE 01

Concept Design : OPTION 3.a – ELEVATIONS – EAST ADDITION 01 EAST NORTH SOUTH 41

Concept Design : OPTION 3.a – ELEVATIONS – SOUTH ADDITION 01 EAST WEST SOUTH 42

Concept Design : 01 OPTION 3.b – SITE PLAN 43

Concept Design : OPTION 3.b – FLOOR PLANS 01 Existing School: 57,400 sf Minor Renovation: 30,400 sf Major Renovation: 20,000 sf N Demolition: 7,000 sf New Construction: 45,000 sf Total – Option 1: 95,400 sf 44

Concept Design : OPTION 3.b – NE AERIAL PERSPECTIVE 01 45

Concept Design : OPTION 3.b – SE AERIAL PERSPECTIVE 01 46

Concept Design : OPTION 3.b – ELEVATIONS – EAST ADDITION 01 EAST NORTH SOUTH 47

Concept Design : OPTION 3.b – ELEVATIONS – SOUTH ADDITION 01 EAST NORTH SOUTH 48

Concept Design : 01 OPTION 3.c – SITE PLAN 49

Concept Design : OPTION 3.c – FLOOR PLANS 01 Existing School: 57,400 sf Minor Renovation: 30,400 sf Major Renovation: 20,000 sf N Demolition: 7,000 sf New Construction: xx,xxx sf Total – Option 1: xx,xxx sf 50

51 Discussion

DISCUSSION 01 Option 3a Option 3b Option 1 Option 2 (3.c sim) 52

Next Meeting – BLPC #9 – 1.14.14 : CONCEPT DESIGN REFINEMENT UPDATES NEXT STEPS Option Re-Cap Schedule Refinement Budget Cost CONCEPT DESIGN APPROVAL 53

54 Extra Slides – not used

• DON’T LIKE YELLOW BRICK. WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS. • LIKE BRICKWORK (ONLY RED BRICK). • AGREED! • SIGN AND EAGLE MAKE BOLD STATEMENT AND CREATE • NO TREES.  IDENTITY. • ALMOST FEELS FEDERAL. • TOO LONG. • NO. 55

• TOO MODERN AND BOXY. • VERY DIFFERENT WITH EXPOSED PIPES/DUCTS; HANGING LAMPS. • WAY TOO MUCH GLASS. • AWESOME. • TOO MUCH GLASS AND STERILE LOOKING. 56