welcome meeting guidelines
play

WELCOME MEETING GUIDELINES Participants should be respectful This - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

INTERSTATE 75 / COUNTY ROAD 99 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC MEETING August 13, 2020 | 5 p.m. WELCOME MEETING GUIDELINES Participants should be respectful This meeting is being recorded. All o o and considerate of the opinions questions


  1. INTERSTATE 75 / COUNTY ROAD 99 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC MEETING August 13, 2020 | 5 p.m. WELCOME

  2. MEETING GUIDELINES Participants should be respectful This meeting is being recorded. All o o and considerate of the opinions questions and comments received of others are considered public record. Demeaning, derogatory, o Please keep questions and o inflammatory, or vulgar language comments as specific as possible or actions will not be permitted and relevant to this project The moderator may interrupt, o Please limit spoken questions and o warn, or mute a speaker if comments to two minutes or less statements are too lengthy, For technical assistance, call o personally-directed, abusive, or obscene (419) 999-6830 3 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  3. AGENDA & COMMENTS QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS AGENDA Chat Box: Located to the right side of o Announcements o the video box Introductions o Text: Text Y305 to 73224, then follow o Presentation o prompts Question and Comment Session Voicemail: (855) 925-2801, code 9532 o o *2 to record Speak Live: (855) 925-2801, code 9532 o *3 to enter queue Comment Form: Located below the o video box All comments carry equal weight o 4 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  4. INTRODUCTIONS SLM 6.69 o C hris Hughes, ODOT District 1 Deputy Director CR-62 CR-62 o Jenn Gasser, ODOT District 1 Project Manager o Nate Tessler, ODOT District 1 Environmental SLM 1.29 Coordinator SLM 5.63 SLM 0.04 o Matt Selhorst, HDR Project Manager SLM 1.96 CR-65 CR-65 CR-68 5 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  5. ODOT WELCOME WELCOME TO THE MEETING! Chris Hughes, ODOT District 1 Deputy Director 6 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  6. OVERVIEW SLM 6.69 o ODOT is working to make travel around the I-75 and CR 99 interchange easier and safer CR-62 CR-62 o CR 99 improvements are an ODOT priority. Area drivers experience: Travel delays o SLM 1.29 Higher than average crash rates o SLM 5.63 SLM 0.04 o Current feasibility study Explores recommended alternatives in detail o SLM 1.96 CR-65 CR-65 Identifies a Preferred Alternative o o Project Partners CR-68 Hancock County o City of Findlay o 7 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  7. STUDY AREA 8 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  8. STUDY OVERVIEW � PROPOSED SCHEDULE 2020 2021 2022 2023 Jan-March April-June July -Sept Oct - Dec Jan-March April-June July -Sept Oct - Dec Jan-March April-June July -Sept Oct - Dec Jan-March April-June July -Sept Oct - Dec Feasibility Study Design Right of Way Acquisition Construction 9 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  9. STUDY COMPONENTS Scope of Study o Traffic projections o Analyze alternative improvements for I-75 Interchange and CR 99 o intersections Geometrics to address traffic demands, right-of-way impacts, o utility impacts, construction traffic maintenance, costs Engage stakeholders/public o Recommend a preferred alternative o Deliverables o Feasibility study with preferred alternative o Plan, profile, cross sections, cost estimate for preferred alternative o 10 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  10. PURPOSE o Amount of Crashes: Create more efficient and safer intersection travel through this corridor; o Limited Capacity: Reduce crashes due to speeding and distracted driving by allowing for less congestion at intersections; and o Future Development: Plan for new development leading to congestion through this corridor, especially on the exit ramps. 11 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  11. CRASH HISTORY 93 crashes (27 injury, 66 Property Damage Only) between 2017-2019 for the corridor Rear-End- 40 o Angle- 16 o Sideswipe - 8 o 12 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  12. CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT 13 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  13. TRAFFIC � CAPACITY ANALYSIS Current 2020 traffic 2044 No Build projections Intersection PM Level Delay Intersection PM Level Delay of (Seconds) of (Seconds) Service Service Technology/CR 99 D 28.2 Technology/CR 99 F >100 I-75 Southbound/CR 99 C 33.1 I-75 Southbound/CR 99 F >100 I-75 Northbound/CR 99 D 50.8 I-75 Northbound/CR 99 F >100 Speedway B 10.2 Speedway F >100 Ventura F >100 Ventura F >100 N. Main D 31.1 N. Main D 41.3 14 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  14. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES o Alternative 1 � Traditional Diamond Interchange, Widen Existing Bridge o Alternative 2 � Traditional Diamond Interchange, New Bridge o Alternative 3 � Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) o Alternative 4 � Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI), Separate Pedestrian Access 15 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  15. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES � ALT. 1 WIDEN EXISTING STRUCTURE Insert plan view exhibit 16 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  16. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES � ALT 2. NEW STRUCTURE Insert plan view exhibit 17 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  17. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES � ALT. 3 DDI (3) Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) Insert revised plan view exhibit 18 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  18. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES � ALT. 4 DDI WITH SEPARATE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 19 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  19. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES - ALT. 4 DDI WITH SEPARATE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 20 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  20. DDI OPERATIONAL VIDEO To watch, go to: https://youtu.be/-I90S3p6XJs

  21. ALTERNATIVE TRAFFIC SIMULATIONS - TRADITIONAL 22 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  22. ALTERNATIVE TRAFFIC SIMULATIONS - DDI 23 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  23. CR 99 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS o Install turn lanes to Technology, Speedway Drive, and Ventura Drive intersections o New traffic signals at Technology Drive and Ventura Drive o Upgrade existing traffic signals o Multiuse path on south side of CR 99 and sidewalk on north side of CR 99 24 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  24. CR 99 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS CR 99/Technology Drive Intersection : Add Traffic Signal and Westbound and Eastbound left turning lanes o Insert revised plan view exhibit 25 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  25. CR 99 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS CR 99/Ventura Drive Intersection : Add Traffic Signal and Eastbound and Westbound left turning lanes o 26 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  26. CR 99 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS CR 99/N. Main Street Intersection : Maintain Existing o 27 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

  27. ALTERNATIVE COMPARISON Estimated Cost Property (includes CR 99 Alternatives Interchange Capacity and Safety Benefits Requirements improvements) Alternative 1: Widen existing • Dedicated turn lanes improve traffic flow and reduce risk of crashes bridge (Traditional interchange 6.8 acres $14-17 million • Max queue expected at I-75 NB ramp intersection: 570' configuration) Max queue expected at Speedway: 680' • Alternative 2: Add second bridge • Dedicated turn lanes improve traffic flow and reduce risk of crashes 6.9 acres $14-17 million (Traditional interchange • Max queue expected at I- 75 NB �a�� ���e��ec����: 570� configuration) Max queue expected at Speedway: 680' • Eliminates queues for left turning vehicles to I-75 • Alternative 3: Construct a • Max queue expected at I-75 NB ramp intersection: 410� Diverging Diamond Interchange Ma� ��e�e e��ec�ed a� S�eed�a�: 560� • $16-19 million 7.7 acres with bicycle/pedestrian access on • Reduces crashes by 33% compared to traditional configuration CR 99 bridge Value of Safety benefits = $2-3 million savings over 20-30 yrs. • compared to Traditional configuration • Eliminates queues for left turning vehicles to I-75 Alternative 4: Construct a • Max queue expected at I-75 NB ramp intersection: 410� Diverging Diamond Interchange Ma� ��e�e e��ec�ed a� S�eed�a�: 560� • $18-22 million 7.4 acres with separated • Reduces crashes by 33% compared to traditional configuration 28 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation bicycle/pedestrian bridge Value of Safety benefits = $2-3 million savings over 20-30 yrs. • compared to Traditional configuration

  28. NEXT STEPS o Receive comments by September 13 o Recommend preferred alternative o Complete feasibility study and begin design Mail: Jennifer Gasser, P.E. ODOT District 1 1885 North McCullough Street Lima, Ohio 45801 Email: Jennifer.Gasser@dot.ohio.gov Phone: (419) 999-6871 29 | HAN- IR 75 & CR 99 Interchange Rehabilitation

Recommend


More recommend