wdatcp priorities for industry working together for safe
play

WDATCP Priorities for Industry: Working together for Safe Food, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

WDATCP Priorities for Industry: Working together for Safe Food, Honestly Sold Steve Ingham Administrator, Div. of Food Safety WI Dept. of Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection Mutual understanding of: Scope of the food safety


  1. WDATCP Priorities for Industry: Working together for “Safe Food, Honestly Sold” Steve Ingham Administrator, Div. of Food Safety WI Dept. of Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection

  2. Mutual understanding of:  Scope of the food safety challenge  Macro-factors that might affect future food safety  Hazards and controls associated with ingredients  Hazards and controls associated with processes  Requirements and susceptibility of customers  Strengths and limitations of the food safety regulatory system

  3. Doing the numbers – foodborne illness of microbial origin in the USA  Experienced > Reported > Confirmed > Attributed  31 major pathogens (identified cause): ◦ 9.4M episodes; ◦ 56,000 hospitalizations; ◦ 1,350 deaths ◦ Scallan et al., 2011a. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17: 7 – 15  “unspecified agents”: ◦ 38.4 M episodes; ◦ 72,000 hospitalizations; ◦ 1,700 deaths ◦ Scallan et al., 2011b. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17: 16 - 22

  4. Costs of food-borne illness in USA  Medical cost  Productivity lost  Illness-related mortality (estimated value of life)  $51 to $78 billion  $1,100 - $1,600 per case  Many low-cost cases, few high-cost cases

  5. Comparison with other causes of death in USA  Radon – 21,000 lung cancer-related deaths  Influenza – 3,000 to 49,000 (varies with year and study)  Heart diseases – about 600,000  Homicide – about 17,000  Medical errors – 44,000

  6. Macro-factors that might affect future food safety  Climate  Population growth  Urbanization  Aging populations  Changes in health care delivery  Trade globalization  Travel globalization

  7. Climate change

  8. Population Growth

  9. Food-borne illness episodes attributable to major pathogens  Norovirus: 5.5M  Salmonella spp: 1.0M  Clostridium perfringens : 966K  Campylobacter : 845K  Staphylococcus aureus : 241K  Shigella spp.: 131K  Non-O157 Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC): 113K  Toxoplasma gondii : 87K  Giardia : 77K  O157 STEC: 63K

  10. Major Sources of Food-borne Pathogens  Norovirus: feces, vomitus from humans  Salmonella spp: feces from animals, humans  Clostridium perfringens : soil; feces of animals and humans  Campylobacter : feces of birds and animals  Staphylococcus aureus : skin of animals and humans  Shigella spp.: feces of humans  Non-O157 Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC): feces of cattle and humans  Toxoplasma gondii : feces of animals  Giardia : feces of animals  water  O157 STEC: feces of cattle and humans

  11. Where Chickens Are Raised 12

  12. Where Hogs Are Raised 13

  13. Where Cattle Are Raised 14

  14. Global trade of grains and oilseeds

  15. Concentration of Food Processing and Sales (Stats ca. 2011)  4 companies: over 80% of U.S. beef.  4 companies: 67% of U.S. pork. Plants that slaughter over a million hogs per year supply 95% of market (compared to 27% in 1976).  4 companies: 59% of U.S. chicken.  5 companies: 50% of U.S. supermarket sales 20

  16. And yet… A tale of two systems

  17. Even a small company is in a global market

  18. Dairy Farms – Grade A  Produce ca. 98% of total WI milk  2012 survey results: largest 21% of farms (> 2.6 M lbs per year) produce 71% of grade A milk  These farms would pass EU SCC criterion 98% of the time  Smallest farms (< 550,000 lbs per year): 20% of farms, 2.5% of milk, would pass EU SCC criterion 85% of time

  19. Dairy Farms – Grade B  14% of farms producing 2% of the WI milk

  20. Seems sim Seems simple, doesn’t it? It’s no le, doesn’t it? It’s not! t! Producers Processors Distributors Sellers Consumers

  21. Ingredient issues start at the farm  Chemical and biological inputs  Water quality  Wild and domestic animals  Contamination via neighbors  Feed for animals

  22. Biological Soil Amendments 28 6/23/2014

  23. Harvest Hygiene

  24. Water Quality and Post-Harvest Handling

  25. Global and Local Sourcing of Ingredients

  26. Sanitary Transportation of Food

  27. Transport: what are your specifications? Are they being met?

  28. Safe Food Transport – problems at street level!

  29. Dairy Plants

  30. Food Processing Plants

  31. Understand the process

  32. Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls ◦ Hazard analysis, including intentional adulterants: what can go wrong? ◦ Preventive controls: what can you do to control the hazards? ◦ Monitoring: how will you know? ◦ Corrective actions: “Oops”… ◦ Verification: Proof that preventive controls work

  33. An inspection priority: looking at what the firm measures and records

  34. Consider environmental sampling  Can help verify that preventive controls are effective  WDATCP looking at regulatory testing for indicator bacteria in Zones 1 and 2 of RTE processing areas

  35. Should regulations adopt microbiological performance standards?  Performance standard, examples  Requirement to destroy a specified number of pathogen cells  Requirement to prevent pathogen growth  “How to” standard, example  Hold raw-milk cheese for at least 60 days at a temperature not less than 35°F  Encourage flexibility and innovation  Let the science speak  “Safe Harbors” for those without resources to conduct studies

  36. Don’t forget the basics!

  37. Retail Food Establishments

  38. Know your customers  Accuracy in labeling  Susceptible populations

  39. Civics 101 (why regulatory change can lag behind industry change)  To address “big problems”, elected officials pass LEGISLATION  Often empowers or requires agency to create regulations  Sometimes “little problems” are addressed  Non-elected officials create REGULATIONS and GUIDANCE  May be possible without new legislation  Requirements for meeting the “big picture” goals = regulations  Writing and approving regulations can take years  Information on complying with regulations = guidance which may be the day-to-day reality for industry and regulators  GET INVOLVED!!  Industry and public comments

  40. Regulating food safety today  “Fair, effective, and efficient – regardless of how big the business is!  Is undergoing a transition.  Past  Command and control – “This is what you must do.”  “Snapshot” on-site observations – “This is what I see now.”  Present  How well is establishment controlling the process?  Preventive  Documentation emphasis – “This is what your records show since the last inspection.”

  41. Food Safety Regulation in the Future  More Emphasis on “Upstream”Food Sources • More regulation of on-farm practices (especially produce). • Yet, increasing pressure to exempt “small” and “local”. • More scrutiny of “supply contracts” that dictate food safety requirements. • More scrutiny of private auditing and certification of suppliers. 48

  42. Regulatory challenges ahead…  Regulators are in uncharted territory  Success of regulatory efforts depends on people  Resources for hiring (and keeping) the best  Training!  The “time sink” of compliance actions  How can we better integrate with federal regulators?  FSMA regulations  changes in laws, rules, jurisdictions, training  How can we better receive, process, and transmit information?  Standardization of processes  Avoiding mixed messages

  43. Questions?  Steve.Ingham@wi.gov  608-224-4701

Recommend


More recommend