verb tenses temporal adverbs episodic verbs and ability
play

Verb Tenses, Temporal Adverbs, Episodic Verbs, and Ability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Verb Tenses, Temporal Adverbs, Episodic Verbs, and Ability Explicated in Transparent Intensional Logic Logika: systmov rmec rozvoje oboru v R a koncepce logickch propedeutik pro mezioborov studia (reg. . CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0216,


  1. Verb Tenses, Temporal Adverbs, Episodic Verbs, and Ability Explicated in Transparent Intensional Logic Logika: systémový rámec rozvoje oboru v ČR a koncepce logických propedeutik pro mezioborová studia (reg. č. CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0216, OPVK) doc. PhDr. Jiří Raclavský, Ph.D. ( raclavsky@phil.muni.cz ) Department of Philosophy, Masaryk University, Brno

  2. 1 1 1 1 Jiří Raclavský (2014): Verb Tenses, Temporal Adverbs, Episodic Verbs, and Ability Explicated in TIL Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract An important period of Transparent Intensional Logic started after Tichý’s adoption of time-moments in the system. Tichý’s analysis of verb tenses, temporal adverbs and temporal prepositions is a proposal rivalling the other proposal at the date of its publishing (1980). On the other hand, there is no known competitor to Tichý’s logical analysis of episodic verbs and verb aspects (Tichý published his analysis also in 1980). Finally, we present the joint work of Tichý and Oddie on ability and freedom, i.e. analysis of some activity notions. Logika: systémový rámec rozvoje oboru v ČR a koncepce logických propedeutik pro mezioborová studia (reg. č. CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0216, OPVK)

  3. 2 2 2 2 Jiří Raclavský (2014): Verb Tenses, Temporal Adverbs, Episodic Verbs, and Ability Explicated in TIL Content Content Content Content I. Preliminaries I I I II II. II II Semantics of temporal discourse III. Semantics of episodic verbs III III III IV IV. Ability, freedom, responsibility IV IV Logika: systémový rámec rozvoje oboru v ČR a koncepce logických propedeutik pro mezioborová studia (reg. č. CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0216, OPVK)

  4. 3 3 3 3 Jiří Raclavský (2014): Verb Tenses, Temporal Adverbs, Episodic Verbs, and Ability Explicated in TIL I. I. I. I. Preliminaries Preliminaries Preliminaries Preliminaries Logika: systémový rámec rozvoje oboru v ČR a koncepce logických propedeutik pro mezioborová studia (reg. č. CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0216, OPVK)

  5. 4 4 4 4 Jiří Raclavský (2014): Verb Tenses, Temporal Adverbs, Episodic Verbs, and Ability Explicated in TIL I. Some basic concepts of TIL used for explication I. Some basic concepts of TIL used for explication I. Some basic concepts of TIL used for explication I. Some basic concepts of TIL used for explication - extensions : truth-values (ο-objects, T, F), individuals (ι-objects), classes of objects (i.e. (ο ξ )-objects; for any type ξ ), logical functions ( ¬ , ∧ , …, ∀ , …), etc. - intensions = function from possible worlds and time-moments: properties (i.e. (ο ξ ) τω -objects), propositions (i.e. ο τω -objects), etc. - constructions (written by certain λ-terms) of intensions / non-intensions as meanings (logical analyses) expressed by linguistic expressions - constructions construct intensions/extensions - e.g. logical analysis (meaning) of the sentence “Peter is happy” is the propositional construction (=construction of a proposition) λ w λ t [Happy Happy wt Peter Happy Happy Peter] Peter Peter Logika: systémový rámec rozvoje oboru v ČR a koncepce logických propedeutik pro mezioborová studia (reg. č. CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0216, OPVK)

  6. 5 5 5 5 Jiří Raclavský (2014): Verb Tenses, Temporal Adverbs, Episodic Verbs, and Ability Explicated in TIL I I I II. Semantics of temporal discourse I. Semantics of temporal discourse I. Semantics of temporal discourse I. Semantics of temporal discourse Logika: systémový rámec rozvoje oboru v ČR a koncepce logických propedeutik pro mezioborová studia (reg. č. CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0216, OPVK)

  7. 6 6 6 6 Jiří Raclavský (2014): Verb Tenses, Temporal Adverbs, Episodic Verbs, and Ability Explicated in TIL II. II. Semantics of temporal discourse II. II. Semantics of temporal discourse Semantics of temporal discourse: introduction of temporal parameter Semantics of temporal discourse : introduction of temporal parameter : introduction of temporal parameter : introduction of temporal parameter - satisfaction of a condition (i.e. property/relation/proposition) such as BE AT HOME is performed in time, condition is a temporal affair (see the philosophical justification in The Transiency of Truth, Tichý 1980, Theoria ) - we need an addition of a temporal parameter to the modal one (already in 1978) - various ‘names’ of time-moments or their classes, i.e. intervals , such as dates (“1/1/1977”/(ο τ )), temporal (e.g. frequency) adverbs, etc., such as “yesterday” /((ο τ ) τ ), “since”, … - their analysis is in fact unproblematical (cf. Tichý 1980) - key paper: The Logic of Temporal Discourse (1980, Linguistic and Philosophy ) Logika: systémový rámec rozvoje oboru v ČR a koncepce logických propedeutik pro mezioborová studia (reg. č. CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0216, OPVK)

  8. 7 7 7 7 Jiří Raclavský (2014): Verb Tenses, Temporal Adverbs, Episodic Verbs, and Ability Explicated in TIL II. Semantics of temporal II. Semantics of temporal discourse II. Semantics of temporal II. Semantics of temporal discourse discourse: discourse : logical : : logical logical logical structure of a common structure of a common structure of a common structure of a common sentence sentence sentence sentence - Tichý argues that simple analysis Tense(UnderlyingProposition) is wrong - he suggests rather structure: Tense (FrequencyAdverb(UnderlyingProposition)), ReferenceTime) - cf . “X was at least once drunk in 1977”: λ w λ t [Past Past Past t [AtLeastOnce Past AtLeastOnce AtLeastOnce w λ w ’λ t ’ [BeDrunk AtLeastOnce BeDrunk BeDrunk w ’ t ’ X BeDrunk X X X ]]] 1977 1977 1977 1977] - past tense – WAS - frequency adverb – AT LEAST ONCE - reference time – 1977 - underlying proposition – X IS DRUNK Logika: systémový rámec rozvoje oboru v ČR a koncepce logických propedeutik pro mezioborová studia (reg. č. CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0216, OPVK)

  9. 8 8 8 8 Jiří Raclavský (2014): Verb Tenses, Temporal Adverbs, Episodic Verbs, and Ability Explicated in TIL II. Semantics of temporal discourse II. Semantics of temporal discourse: definition of II. Semantics of temporal discourse II. Semantics of temporal discourse : definition of : definition of : definition of a a tense a a tense tense tense - the sentence “In 1977, X was at least once drunk” is true if the proposition “X is drunk” was true within the time-interval 1/1/1977 - 31/12/1977 at least once - in Tichý’s explication, grammatical tense operates on what is the result of applying the function ‘at least once’ to the proposition ‘X is drunk’, and the reference time - tenses are thus (ο (ο(οτ)) (οτ)) τ -objects - definitions of all tenses (simple-past, present-perfect, …, ) in (Tichý 1980) - e.g.: ast t l i ] ⇔ df [Sng Sng.λ o [ [ ∃ ∃ .λ t ‘ [ [ i t ‘] ∧ ∃ ∃ ∧ ∧ [ t ‘ < ∧ < t ] ] ∧ < < ∧ [ o = ∧ ∧ = [ l λ t ‘‘ [[ i t ‘‘] ∧ ∧ ∧ ∧ [ t ‘‘ < < < < t ]] ]] ] ]] [P P P Past ast ast Sng Sng = = where i / (οτ); l / (ο(οτ)); < < ( > < < > > , ≤ > ≤ ≤ ≤ , ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ) / (οττ); o / ο ; Sng Sng Sng Sng/(ο(οο)) (‘singularizer’); Logika: systémový rámec rozvoje oboru v ČR a koncepce logických propedeutik pro mezioborová studia (reg. č. CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0216, OPVK)

  10. 9 9 9 9 Jiří Raclavský (2014): Verb Tenses, Temporal Adverbs, Episodic Verbs, and Ability Explicated in TIL II. Semantics of temporal discourse: definitions of tenses II. Semantics of temporal discourse: definitions of tenses II. Semantics of temporal discourse: definitions of tenses II. Semantics of temporal discourse: definitions of tenses - explications of selected tenses (most of them from Tichý 1980, definition of present tense is mine) - simple past (préteritum – minulý čas): t t l i ] ⇔ df [Sng Sng.λ o [ [ ∃ ∃ .λ t ‘ [ [ i t ‘] ∧ ∃ ∃ ∧ ∧ [ t ‘ < ∧ < t ] ] ∧ < < ∧ [ o = ∧ ∧ = [ l λ t ‘‘ [[ i t ‘‘] ∧ ∧ ∧ ∧ [ t ‘‘ < < < < t ]] ]] ] ]] [Pas Past Pas Pas t t Sng Sng = = - present perfect (perfektum – předpřítomný čas): Pf t l i ] ⇔ df [Sng Sng.λ o [ [ ∃ ∃ .λ t ‘ [ λ t ‘‘ [[ t ‘ < ∃ ∃ < t ‘‘] ∧ < < ∧ ∧ ∧ [ t ‘‘ ≤ ≤ t ]] ⊂ ≤ ≤ ⊂ ⊂ i ]] ⊂ [Pf Pf Pf Sng Sng ∧ ∧ ∧ ∧ [ o = = [ l λ t ‘‘‘ [[ i t ‘‘‘] ∧ ∧ ∧ ∧ [ t ‘‘‘ ≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ t ]] ]] ] ]] = = - present time (prézens – přítomný čas): Pr t l i ] ⇔ df [Sng Sng.λ o [ [ ∃ ∃ .λ t ‘ [[ i t ‘] ∧ ∧ [ t ‘ = = t ]]] ∧ ∧ [ o = = [ l λ t ‘‘ [[ i t ‘‘] ∧ ∧ ∃ ∃ ∧ ∧ ∧ ∧ ∧ ∧ [Pr [ t ‘‘ = = t ]] ]]]] Pr Pr Sng Sng = = = = = = Logika: systémový rámec rozvoje oboru v ČR a koncepce logických propedeutik pro mezioborová studia (reg. č. CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0216, OPVK)

Recommend


More recommend