2012 SPIM Conference, 7 th December 2012, London th Update on SURF IM Joint Industry Project Patrick O’Brien Patrick O Brien, Group Director Strategic Business & Marketing, Wood Group Kenny Experience that Delivers
Introduction Key Presentation Points: • SURF IM Participation & Workscope • Picture Tour of what is being done g • How SURF IM JIP is evolving for the future Experience that Delivers 1
SURF IM Joint Industry Project y j • Participation: – BG, BHP Billiton, BP, Chevron, Hess, Maersk Oil, Petrobras, Petronas, Shell, Suncor Total Woodside Suncor, Total, Woodside • Scope: – Review of SURF System Design & Operation (An integrated approach) – Review of SURF System Design & Operation (An integrated approach) – Comprehensive Catalogue of Failures & Failure Mechanisms – Identify and catalogue existing inspection and monitoring technology – Evaluate Inspection & Monitoring Technology Gaps and identify emerging Evaluate Inspection & Monitoring Technology Gaps and identify emerging appropriate technologies for SURF inspection & monitoring – Prepare a Best-Practice Guidance Note for SURF Integrity Management • Schedule – Commenced: January 2011 – Complete: Mid 2013 – Complete: Mid 2013 Experience that Delivers 2
SURF Integrity Management Guideline g y g Review Relevant Public Dom ain I ndustry Standards Operators’ Best Operator Best Practice SURF IM Practices Experiences Is sharing possible? Mapping Failure Expertise in Expertise in Modes onto an Modes onto an W ood Group I ntegrity Inspection & Kenny Managem ent & Experience Monitoring Strategy Technology Experience that Delivers 3
SURF IM Work Scope (Graphically) ( y) Design and Operational Requirements I ndustry Experience Failure • Operational Experience Mechanisms • Design Experience • Failure Modes/ Mechanisms SURF I M JI P Holistic Integrity I ndustry I ntegrity Management Scope of W ork p Managem ent g Methodology Methodology Approach Inspection Inspection and p Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Sampling Testing & Analysis Requirements Requirements Assessm ent of I nspection/ I nspection/ Potential New Insp. Condition and Monitoring Monitoring Technologies Experience that Delivers 4 Methods
Assessment of Probability of Occurrence (as input to Risk) Occurrence (as input to Risk) o Probability y P P U Index, P P P [ TSO DU A ] o T Technology Step-Out: h l St O t Design Uncertainty : Anomaly: Uncertainty concerning new Uncertainty from Uncertainty due to anomaly or technology applications • Inputs: design basis defect from construction, • Response: analytical installation or operation. p techniques or tools What we don’t know What we know What we know we don’t know we don’t know we know we know DU P o TSO Increase in P due to uncertainty uncertainty Possible reduction in 1 2 3 4 5 P due to IM measures reducing uncertainty reducing uncertainty Experience that Delivers 5
SURF IM Evolution • Physical and VC Meetings Physical and VC Meetings • 3-Day Physical Meetings – Perth March 2011 – Houston November 2011 – Aberdeen and Oslo May 2012 – London October 2012 – Paris May 2013 P i M 2013 • Meetings take time (1.5 days) to share knowledge on subsea component failures and subsea operations experience and subsea operations experience – Engage local operator offices as we move around • SURF IM Scope Extension – Subsea Processing – SURF IM Business Case – Sharing Experience on Application of New Inspection & Monitoring Techniques Techniques Experience that Delivers 6
Output Preparation Corporate Requirements & Standard Risk Matrix Develop / Review IM Performance Standards/ Processes Regulatory Requirements Integrity Basis Assemble / Review Design Data System Data Previous IM Work (e.g. Risk System analysis, IM Plans) Subdivision & Grouping F b/I Fab/Install, Inspection and / or t ll I ti d / Operational Data Risk Analysis Hazard & Risk Analysis Failure Mode Database HAZID Reporting / Documentation Risk Assessment Failure Database No Reliability All risks Implement Barriers / Assessment acceptable ? Mitigation Measures Yes Database of Available IM Develop Integrity Management Plan Measures Integrity Management Plan Inspection Monitoring Analysis and Testing Operational Procedures Preventative Maintenance Anomaly Limits / KPIs Anomaly Limits / KPIs Anomaly Limits / KPIs Anomaly Limits / KPIs Anomaly Limits / KPIs S Spares Strategy St t Schedule Implement Integrity Management Plan Risk Assessment and / or IM Plan Revision Inspection and / or Periodic Review & Fitness Operational Data Assessment Regulatory / Compliance Review Fitness Statement & (If Required) Recommended Changes No Review / Propose Revision of Neglected Plan executed? Procedures Regulatory / Compliance g y p Yes Yes Reports (If Required) No Develop & Execute Repair / Fit for Purpose? Remediation Plan Experience that Delivers 7 Yes
Integrity Through Field Life g y g Risk Management and Integrity Management S trategy Design Design Concept Concept Detail Detail De- De- Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility Feasibility FEED FEED FEED FEED Operate Operate Operate Operate Selection Selection Design Design Commission Commission Manufacture Installation Installation Testing (FAT, SIT) Pre-Commission Storage/Preservation Commission Experience that Delivers 8
Failure Modes Categorisation g Failure Drivers • Fatigue • Accidental Damage • Corrosion/Erosion • Flow Assurance/ Flow Restriction • Electrical; • Temperature • Pressure P Experience that Delivers 9
Mapping Failure Modes to IM Strategy g gy Map failure modes by identification of existing baseline and M f il d b id tifi ti f i ti b li d emerging technology: Equipment Failure Consequence Integrity Management Measures Failure No. Sub- Failure Failure Failure Record of C C Monitoring Inspection Testing and Equipment Equipment Initiator Initiator Mechanism Mechanism Occurrence C S C S C E C E C C Monitoring Inspection Procedures Procedures Maintenance Maintenance F component Driver Mode Result O Analysis Subsea Piping - Jumpers, Flowlines and Spools ocarbon containment ental Damage 1. Dropped objects due to 3rd party 1. Deck lifting and 2. Anchors and mooring vessels Deformation handling External SP 001 1. Jumpers 3. Dragged line or over stress Happened 1. Metal loss 2. Vessel exclusion damage Subsea Piping 2. Flowlines 4. ROV impact due to to NA M H 1. Pressure 1.GVI defect zone collapse 3. Spools 5. Natural disaster (iceberg localized operator(s) assessment 3. Dropped object Accide Loss of Hydro or rupture or rupture interaction, storm, etc) impact reporting 6. Trawl board/fishing activity 4. ROV handling Experience that Delivers 10
Technology Review Process gy Failure Modes Baseline Baseline Assessm ent I nspection & Technology Monitoring Catalogue ( Task 1 .0 ) Measures I dentification of Em erging TRL Assessm ent Public Dom ain T Technologies h l i Review Operator Experiences Technology Gaps How is I ntegrity Assessed? Experience that Delivers 11
Baseline Inspection & Monitoring Technology Technology Compilation of Baseline Technology • Identification of technologies available to support baseline Inspection & Monitoring Measures Inspection & Monitoring Measures • Completion of catalogue with technologies available to be deployed for assessment of specific defect or deterioration. • Classification based on Failure Drivers – Facilitate mapping of technologies to failure mode assessment assessment – Systematic approach to ensure comprehensive review – Presentation using a Flowchart format f • Compilation of technology datasheets Experience that Delivers 12
Baseline Technology Mapping Electrical Power / Communications Electrical Power / Communications Experience that Delivers 13
Baseline Technology Mapping Erosion / Internal Corrosion Erosion / Internal Corrosion Experience that Delivers 14
Technology Datasheets Compilation gy Technology Datasheet Technology Datasheet – Catalogue Catalogue Method 1.3 Intelligent NDT Inspection Pigging Magnetic Flux Leakage Magnetic Flux Leakage To utilize magnetic fields to detect flaws and cracks in steel sections. MFL are PURPOSE currently used extensively in intellignet pigs as a NDT inspection technique 1 Applicable Control Systems Systems S t Subsea Piping Subsea Structures (main piping) Umbilicals Xmas Tree 2 Strategic Level 2 Strategic Level DDD : Defect, Detection and Degradation Monitoring DDD : Defect, Detection and Degradation Monitoring ELR : Exposure, Load and Response Monitoring SLM : Safety Limit Monitoring GLC : General Layout and Configuration Monitoring 3 Scope of Global Integrity / Condition. Condition C diti Local Integrity / Condition. Assessment Exposure / Environment. 4 Level of Intrusion External. Internal. In-line In-line. Experience that Delivers 15
Recommend
More recommend
