unionville chadds ford school district
play

Unionville-Chadds Ford School District CSCI Data Spring 2018 School - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Unionville-Chadds Ford School District CSCI Data Spring 2018 School Climate: NSCCs Definition School climate refers to the quality and character of school life related to norms and values, social interactions, and organizational


  1. Unionville-Chadds Ford School District CSCI Data Spring 2018

  2. School Climate: NSCC’s Definition ➢ School climate refers to the quality and character of school life related to norms and values, social interactions, and organizational structures, as experienced by members of the school community: ❖ Students ❖ Staff ❖ Parents

  3. Background on the Comprehensive School Climate Inventory (CSCI) Developed in 2002, The Comprehensive School Climate Inventory (CSCI) measures how critical groups • – students, school personnel and parents/ guardians – perceive the school’s climate for learning. The CSCI was evaluated by three independent survey development experts at Columbia & Fordham in 2006 • who confirmed the tool was reliable & valid . Three recent studies confirm the CSCI’s strength : • 1) A 2010 study of 102 school climate surveys found the CSCI to be one of only three measures to meet American Psychological Association criteria for reliability and validity (Gangi). 2) A 2011 study of 73 middle school measures, recommended ten as being reliable, valid and aligned with SEL research. Of those, the CSCI was the only school climate measure recommended ( Social Development Research Group ). 3) Clifford, M., M., Condon, R., & Hornung, C. (2012). Measuring School Climate for Gauging Principal Performance: A Review of the Validity and Reliability of Publicly Accessible Measures. American Institute for Research ( www.air.org/focus-area/education/index.cfm?fa=viewContent&content_id=1869 )

  4. School Climate Research Findings I. Individual Experience: A positive school climate affects students’ self-esteem and self-concept ➢ II. Risk Prevention and Health Promotion: Effective risk prevention and health promotion efforts are positively correlated with safe, ➢ caring, participatory and responsive school climate settings III. Academic Achievement: Student academic achievement is strongly correlated to a safe, caring, and responsive school ➢ climate setting IV. Teacher Retention: Positive school climate is associated with greater teacher retention ➢ (For a summary of this research as well as a school climate research data base, see: www.schoolclimate.org/climate/research.php and/or Cohen, et. al 2009)

  5. Social Support - Peers Social & Civic Learning Connectedness/ Engagement Rules & Norms Physical Surroundings Physical Security

  6. The School Climate Improvement Model: A five stage process of school climate improvement

  7. Assessment & Improvement Process School Climate Assessment/Evaluation 1. Measurement Process ➢ Interpretation of Results ➢ Action Planning 2. Drill down to key priorities ➢ Research best practices/ evidence-based programs ➢ Planning for Change 3. Form a representative team/ establishing ground rules ➢ Leadership Commitment/ Fostering “Buy in” ➢ Establishing a “no fault” framework/ culture of trust ➢ Community Engagement/Outreach ➢ Define action plans ➢ Establish benchmarks and clear timelines ➢ Program/Project Implementation 4. Re-assessment/Re-evaluation 5.

  8. Interpreting School Climate Findings  School Profile – Strengths & Needs How positive are overall ratings? • Which dimensions are at the top/bottom? • How do perceptions compare for different population groups- • students, staff, and parents? ➢ Individual & Group Variability How much variability and for whom? • Micro-climates – exposure to different environments, different • experiences Individual differences or divergences in perceptions •

  9. Response Rates

  10. Overall School Profile Example – Pocopson ES • Focus on major differences - .2 or higher – between scores • Note high points and strengths! • Look for consistent findings • Are there areas of disconnect between and within groups? • Consider factors that may inform data: context is key!

  11. Student Climate Scores by School • The general trend of scores is similar for all schools • A lot of strengths in the district shown by positive scores (a score over 3.5) • Safety Rules and Norms, Respect for Diversity, Support-Adults, Social Support-Students, School Connectedness Engagement, and Physical Surroundings are strengths at all schools • Middle and High School scores are lower than elementary scores in Support for Learning and Social and Civic Learning.

  12. Faculty Climate Scores by School • Many highly rated dimensions throughout the district, with a lot of scores above 4.0 and near 5.0 • Very strong scores in Sense of Physical Security, Support for Learning, Social- Support-Adults and Students, School Connectedness/Engage ment

  13. Parent Climate Scores by School • Parent perceptions are mostly positive and there are many strengths throughout the district • Very strong scores in the Interpersonal Relationships category • Very strong scores in Safety Rules and Norms and Sense of Physical Security

  14. Climate Scores by Population • There is a lot of convergence between staff, student, and parent scores and they feel similarly for many dimensions. • Staff generally have slightly higher perceptions than students and parents, but most dimensions are rated positively by all three.

  15. Data Dive: Digging Deeper into Subgroups ➢ What does the data tell you? ➢ Micro-climates? ➢ Gaps in perception or areas of convergence? ➢ Relationship between dimensions ➢ Confirmations ➢ Surprises ➢ What else do you want to know? ➢ Additional research, data ➢ questions raised

  16. Student Climate Scores by Grade - Perceptions are higher in the ES level, but mostly positive all-around - Many of the dimensions remain positively rated as grade level increases - - Biggest drop over time is in Social and Civic Learning - Sense of Social-Emotional Security and Social Media are rated lower than the other dimensions throughout grade level

  17. Student Climate Scores by Race/Ethnicity - Racial/ethnic groups exhibit similar patterns for a majority of the dimensions - Most dimensions are rated positively by different race/ethnic subgroups - Black/African American subgroup had lower scores in some of the dimensions * Differences in different race/ethnic subgroups rated dimensions can be explored further in the individual school reports.

  18. Staff Climate Scores by Years at School - Staff exhibit consistent patterns - Leadership and Professional Relationships, are consistently positive among all staff regardless of their length of tenure - Staff of 20+ years report the most positive perceptions - Staff who have been at the school for 1 year and 2 to 5 years, have slightly higher scores in some dimensions.

  19. Opportunities to Address Within Dimension Rankings

  20. Item-by-Item Survey Responses Example: Student – Social-Emotional Security

  21. UCFSD Strengths and Areas for Improvement Strengths: Most dimensions were rated positively by students, staff, and parents in all schools.  Safety Rules and Norms was a major area of strength across all schools in the district,  regardless of grade level School Connectedness/Engagement was a top strength for students, staff, and parents.  Physical Surroundings was a strength across all population groups  Interpersonal Relationships: Respect for Diversity, Social Support – Adults, and  Social Support – Students was consistently rated very positively across all populations. Areas for Potential Action: Sense of Social-Emotional Security and Social Media emerged as an area for potential  improvement in select schools. Social and Civic Learning was rated less positively by students in the middle and high  schools.

  22. Research to Action Connect school climate data with:  Other school or district-level data (i.e. suspension data, incident reports, teacher turnover, etc.)  Context Understanding First-hand knowledge and experience  Existing school-based goals and initiatives   Consider additional areas of research (e.g. Particular unsafe “hot spots” where incidents occur most frequently)

  23. What’s Next for UCFSD  1. Unpack the results (district and school levels)  2. Focus on common themes  3. Use other district and school-level data to connect to school climate data  4. Use multiple strength areas to mitigate areas needing improvement  5. Prioritize areas for action and begin the work  6. Determine when to conduct future surveys

  24. Free NSCC Resources  BULLYBUST – a national campaign that provides FREE resources to help students and adults prevent bullying. www.bullybust.org.  School Climate Resource Center (SCRC) – interactive, on-demand learning site for educators: http://scrc.schoolclimate.org  National School Climate Standards – adopted by Westbrook District! www.schoolclimate.org/climate/standards.php  School Climate Guide for District Policy Makers and Educational Leaders – www.schoolclimate.org/climate/process.php  School Climate Matters – quarterly e-newsletter with key resources, expert articles, and educator tips www.schoolclimate.org.

Recommend


More recommend