ulan coal mines limited
play

Ulan Coal Mines Limited Community Consultative Committee Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ulan Coal Mines Limited Community Consultative Committee Meeting September 2018 Agenda Opening and Welcome Lisa Andrews Lisa Andrews Apologies Business Arising From Previous Minutes Lisa Andrews Confirmation of the Minutes of the Previous


  1. Ulan Coal Mines Limited Community Consultative Committee Meeting September 2018

  2. Agenda Opening and Welcome Lisa Andrews Lisa Andrews Apologies Business Arising From Previous Minutes Lisa Andrews Confirmation of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting Lisa Andrews Correspondence Project Update and Community Development Plan activity Robyn Stoney General Business All Next Meeting Lisa Andrews 2

  3. Introduction Apologies 3

  4. Business arising from previous minutes. BY ACTION ITEMS WHOM 1 Carried over: Investigate salt wicking on banks RS Subject of discussions with our researchers 2 Carried over: Provide time for CCC to provide ideas CCC members to assist community development plan instead of site visit in RS and priorities for the Community Development Plan September. Occurring 11 September 3 Noise monitoring and noise profiling results to be RS To be presented at 11 September meeting and included in slide presentation presented at the next CCC meeting 4 LDP6 average figures to be amended in presentation RS Updated on website before posting on website 5 Check predicted prevailing winds as stated in Project RS Presented in slides for this quarter Approval/EA 6 Request for average wind speed data RS In slide presentation for this meeting 7 Noxious Weeds Act 1993 repealed in July 2017 Replaced by the Biosecurity Act 2015 Review list of Noxious Weeds and update RS State or Regional Priority Weeds now listed in the Central Tablelands Regional Strategic Weed Management Plan 2017-2022* - More in this slide presentation 4 * Central Tablelands Local Land Services, 2017

  5. Monitoring & Environmental Performance

  6. Monitoring - Water Discharge Average Goulburn LDP19 LDP6 Volume River DS 2.78 8.68 13.54 June-18 Discharge from LDP3, 6 and 19 against 5.08 7.74 15.25 July-18 Goulburn River Downstream daily volumes 6

  7. Upstream upgrade The Goulburn River Upstream Gauging Station works • Vegetation removed • Flow velocity sensor fitted into causeway pipe (low flow) • V-notch installed on the causeway (larger flow) • Commissioning completed on the 06/09/18 Vegetation removed & V-Notch installed Data recoded from the velocity sensor 7

  8. Monitoring – Water Average Goulburn Goulburn LDP19 LDP6 EC River US River DS 752 797 463 797 Electrical Conductivity (EC) comparison Jun-18 for Goulburn River & Ulan Creek 773 803 436 800 July-18 discharges 8

  9. Monitoring – Water Average LDP6 Goulburn Goulburn LDP19 pH River US River DS pH comparison for Goulburn River & Ulan Creek June-18 7.19 7.32 7.00 7.97 discharges July-18 7.19 7.32 7.08 8.01 9

  10. Environmental Incidents 2018 YTD Incident 2018 2017 2016 Category (YTD) Incidents Cat 0 6 7 8 Cat 1 8 16 16 Cat 2 0 1 0 Total 14 24 24 10

  11. Community Complaints Complaint 2018 YTD 2017 2016 Type Complaints Complaints Complaints Noise 24 16 4 Dust 1 0 0 Blast 1 0 0 Water 2 2 1 Other 2 1 0 Total 30 19 5 11

  12. Attended Noise Monitoring and Noise Profiling Method 1. The noise analyser was turned on and calibrated. 2. The noise sample was started using ‘start/stop’. 3. When background sounds such as bird calls, planes, traffic went past the instrument was paused. 4. In total each noise sample went for 5min. 5. Noise levels: LA-Min, LA-Max, LA-EQ, LA-50, LA-90. 6. Meteorological data was added later to identify wind speed and stability class at the time.

  13. Results – Property 1 Main Noises Heard: • Wind gust/trees rustling 60 • Bird calls • Consistent machine hum 50 • Dozer movements/Track slap 40 Noise Values (dB(A)) • Dogs barking • Planes LA-Min 30 LA-Max LA-EQ Main Indications 20 LA-50 LA-90 • Max levels were associated 10 with bird calls – high pitch. • Dominant UCML sound – ventilation fans. 0 • No noticeable pattern between weather and noise Time of Sample levels.

  14. Results – Property 2 Main Noises Heard: 60 • Wind gust/trees rustling • Bird calls 50 • Dozer movements/Track slap • Dogs barking • Planes 40 Noise Values (dB(A)) • Ulan Water Operations LA-Min • Moolarben Coal Operations 30 LA-Max LA-EQ Main Indications 20 LA-50 LA-90 • Max levels were associated 10 with bird calls – high pitch and road traffic. • Dominant UCML sound – 0 dozers and track-slap. • No noticeable pattern between Time of Sample weather and noise levels.

  15. Wind Speeds and Direction Patterns – Spring 2017 September November October For 13% (Property 2) and Wind is away from Wind is toward Property 2 7% (Property 1) of the time, both properties, and at a speed which is wind is in the direction of the noise would be worst case for the receiver receiver and at a speed reduced 52% of the time which is worst case for the receiver 15

  16. Wind Speeds and Direction Patterns – Summer 2018 December January February For 18% (Property 2) and For 17% (Property 2) and Wind is in the direction of 12% (Property 1) of the time, 10% (Property 1) of the Property 2 and at a speed wind is in the direction of the time, wind is in the direction which is worst case for the receiver and at a speed of the receiver and at a receiver approximately 9% which is worst case for the speed which is worst case of the time receiver for the receiver 16

  17. Wind Speeds and Direction Patterns – Autumn 2018 March April May For 9.5% (Property 2) and For 4% (Property 2) and Cross winds should reduce 14% (Property 1) of the time, 17% (Property 1) of the time, noise at the receivers wind is in the direction of the wind is in the direction of the receiver and at a speed receiver and at a speed which is worst case for the which is worst case for the receiver receiver 17

  18. Wind Speeds and Direction Patterns – Winter 2018 June July August Stable, calm cold conditions, Stable, calm cold conditions, Cross winds should reduce inversions more common. inversions more common. noise at the receivers Breezes away from and across Breezes across noise noise propagation pathway propagation pathway should should operate to reduce noise operate to reduce noise 18

  19. Regional weed prioritisation process Identified at Ulan Category Objective Weeds in this category These species are not known to be present in the region. PREVENTION To prevent the weed species arriving They have a high to very high weed risk (highly invasive and high threat) and have (equivalent of and establishing in the Region. a high likelihood of arriving in the region due to potential distribution and/ or an W1) existing high risk pathway. To permanently remove the species ERADICATION and its propagules from the Region. These species are present in the region to a limited extent only and the risk of re- (equivalent of OR to destroy infestations to reduce invasion is either minimal or can be easily managed. W2) They have a high to very high weed risk and high feasibility of coordinated control. the extent of the weed in the region with the aim of local eradication. These species have a limited distribution in the region. CONTAINMENT To prevent the ongoing spread of Regional containment strategies aim to prevent spread of the weed from an Fireweed (equivalent of the species in all or part of the invaded part of the region (core infestation), and/or exclude the weed from an African Olive W3) Region. uninvaded part of the region (exclusion zone). Blackberry To prevent the spread of weeds to ASSET Bridal Creeper key sites/assets of high economic, These weed species are widespread and unlikely to be eradicated or contained PROTECTION Cooltai Grass environmental and social value, or to within the wider regional context. (equivalent of Green Cestrum reduce their impact on these sites if Effort is focussed on reducing weed threats to protect priority high value assets. W4) Serrated tussock spread has already occurred. St John’s Wort ALERT Species that are high risk, have suitable habitat in the region, though currently (equivalent of have no identified high-risk pathway for invasion. W5) Bathurst Burr COMMUNITY Blue heliotrope Species that are high priority for asset protection and are actively managed under CONCERN Prickly Pear a number of current programs. It is not feasible to contain or eradicate these (equivalent of Scotch thistle species however minimising their impacts, is reasonably practicable. W5) 19

  20. UCML Reports & Overview of Activities

  21. Progress of the Project Ulan West Ulan Underground • LW4 Start Date was 3 November • LWW4 commenced 5 2017. Extraction of 3.8 September 2017 and has kilometres of a total 4.5 progressed 3.1 kilometres kilometres of a total 3.5 kilometres. • Current development panel is LWW4 will be completed by LW05 the end of August. • Pad installation for Dewatering • Current development infrastructure above LW06 is panels are MGW05 and under construction MGW06 • LWW05 is being set up and Projects is anticipated to commence • Goulburn River final stormwater in November/December controls installed in July 2018 East Pit (discharge) Open Cut Discharge has recommenced at • Care and maintenance low rates • CHPP renovation project The strategy is to continue to reduce levels in the East Pit without increasing the EC 21 Employee Numbers- 626

Recommend


More recommend