tisbury elementary school
play

Tisbury Elementary School JUNE 7, 2017 AGENDA| 1. Latest Community - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SLIDE TITLE| Slide SubTitle Building Committee Presentation for: Tisbury Elementary School JUNE 7, 2017 AGENDA| 1. Latest Community Survey 2. Public Forum & Evaluation Criteria 3. Traffic Study Update 4. General Permitting Update 5.


  1. SLIDE TITLE| Slide Sub‐Title Building Committee Presentation for: Tisbury Elementary School JUNE 7, 2017

  2. AGENDA| 1. Latest Community Survey 2. Public Forum & Evaluation Criteria 3. Traffic Study Update 4. General Permitting Update 5. Discussion of Options 1. New 2‐Story School on the Manter Well Site (Site & Cost, Plans, Massing & Views) 2. New 3‐Story School on the Tisbury School Site (Site& Cost, Plans, Massing & Views) 3. New 2‐Story School on the Tisbury School Site (Site& Cost, Plans, Massing & Views) 4. Addition / Renovation (Site& Cost, Plans, Massing & Views) 5. Base Repair 6. Upcoming Events

  3. COMMUNITY SURVEY| GENERAL INFORMATION • Dates survey was available: May 17 th – May 26 th • Locations survey was available: ‐ online through Survey Monkey ‐ in print at select locations around town • Total number of responses: 138 • Responses to Question 8 have not been included ‐ Q8 (optional): name, email address, phone number • 162 “false” submissions were removed from data set ‐ 162 responses came from the same IP address and submitted in quick batches and some over the span of hours and at unusal times

  4. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q1: PLEASE TELL US ABOUT YOURSELF? (STREET NAME OR ZIP CODE) Answer Response Response Options Percent Count 1.3% 1 02535 6.49% 5 02539 28.57% 22 02557 18.18% 14 02568 20.78% 16 02575 No Zip Code 24.68% 19 Answered Skipped Question Question 138 0

  5. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q2: WHAT IS YOUR AGE? Answer Response Response Options Percent Count Under 25 1 1.4% 26‐35 5 8.0% 36‐45 22 27.5% 46‐55 14 19.6% 56‐65 16 18.8% 66+ 19 24.6% Answered Skipped Question Question 138 0

  6. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q3: WHAT IS YOUR PREFERENCE BETWEEN RENOVATION/EXPANSION OR NEW CONSTUCTION? Answer Options Response Response Answered Skipped Percent Count Question Question 138 0 Renovation/Expansion of existing Tisbury School 50.00% 69 New construction (current site or Manter site) 50.00% 69

  7. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q4: WHAT IS YOUR PREFERENCE OF THE TWO (2) SITE OPTIONS FOR THE TISBURY SCHOOL? Answer Options Response Response Answered Skipped Percent Count Question Question 138 0 Current location (40 W. William Street) 59.4% 82 40.6% 56 Manter site

  8. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q5: IF NEW CONSTRUCTION IS SELECTED BY THE SBC, WHAT IS YOUR PREFERENCE FOR SITE LOCATION? Answer Options Response Response Answered Skipped Percent Count Question Question 138 0 Current location at 40 W. William Street (new) 55.8% 77 44.2% 61 Manter site (new)

  9. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q6: CHOOSE UP TO THREE (3) FACTORS THAT ARE MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU?

  10. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q6: CHOOSE UP TO THREE (3) FACTORS THAT ARE MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU? Answer Options Response Response Percent Count Total cost of project 26.8% 37 Maintenance and/or Operation costs of building 13.8% 19 Environmental impact 35.5% 49 Location of students during construction (existing or temporary space) 35.5% 49 Reuse/renovation of existing Tisbury School building 38.4% 53 Flexibility/adaptability of school building 27.5% 38 Future expansion potential for school building 14.5% 20 Outdoor educational or recreational space 21.0% 29 Proximity to Town Center 39.1% 54 Student safety/security 38.4% 53 Answered Question Skipped Question 138 0

  11. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q7: HOW DO YOU USE THE SCHOOL FACILITIES? (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)

  12. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q7: HOW DO YOU USE THE SCHOOL FACILITIES? (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) Answer Options Response Response Percent Count 31.2% 43 My child is a student at the Tisbury School 68.8% 95 Town Meeting 43.5% 60 Community Use 44.2% 61 Playground 13.0% 18 Gymnasium 26.8% 37 Other / None of the Above Answered Question Skipped Question 138 0

  13. PUBLIC FORUM & EVALUATION CRITERIA | CRITERIA WEIGHTING SITE/OPTION SELECTION TOP 1O CRITERIA VOTES TOTALS TOTALS STEP 1 (EXISTING VS MANTER) IMPACT ON TOWN – LONG TERM 40 EXISTING SITE 35 PLANNING MANTER SITE 29 IMPACT ON TOWN – LOCATION 37 BUILDING EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM FIT 37 TOTALS STEP 2 (ADD/RENO VS NEW) IMPACT TO EDUCATION – SHORT TERM 29 ADDITION/ RENOVATION 22 DESIGN FLEXIBILITY 26 NEW CONSTRUCTION 15 PERMITTING/ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 20 TOTALS STEP 3 (TWO VS THREE STORY) COMMUNITY USAGE/ ACCESS 19 TWO STORY EXISTING SITE 0 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 15 THREE STORY EXISTING SITE 22 POTENTIAL FOR EXPANSION 14 CONSTRUCTABILITY/PHASING 9

  14. TRAFFIC SURVEY| LOCUS MAP

  15. TRAFFIC SURVEY| TRAFFIC COUNT LOCATIONS

  16. TRAFFIC SURVEY| EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS (ATR) – STATE ROAD

  17. TRAFFIC SURVEY| SCHOOL TRIP ORIGIN/DESTINATION

  18. TRAFFIC SURVEY| TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE

  19. TRAFFIC SURVEY| EXISTING VOLUMES & LOS – EXISTING SCHOOL

  20. TRAFFIC SURVEY| EXISTING VOLUMES & LOS – MANTER SITE

  21. TRAFFIC SURVEY| FUTURE NO‐BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES & LOS – EXISTING SITE

  22. TRAFFIC SURVEY| FUTURE NO‐BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES & LOS – MANTER SITE

  23. TRAFFIC SURVEY| FUTURE BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES & LOS – EXISTING SITE

  24. TRAFFIC SURVEY| FUTURE BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES & LOS – MANTER SITE

  25. TRAFFIC SURVEY| RECOMMENDATIONS EXISTING SITE • Improvements to crosswalks and sidewalks; • Review of traffic signage and regulations and improve signage, markings, etc. to meet current standards for schools; and • Reach out to parents via social media. MANTER SITE • Install school zone and signs; • Review of traffic signage and regulations and improve signage, markings, etc. to meet current standards for schools; and • Reach out to parents via social media.

  26. GENERAL PERMITTING UPDATE| TISBURY SCHOOL MANTER SITE SITE MVC X * MHC x NHESP ** X ** SPR x x SP x x CC * MVC – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) ** NHESP Tisbury Site Bushy Rockrose No Longer Listed as of 2012 Manter Site Gerhard’s Underwing Moth Special Concern Faded Gray Geometer Threatened Note: NHESP Mapping is being updated and being reviewed under public comment. Presently neither sites show protection status. Subject to change.

  27. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, MANTER SITE| SITE PLAN NEW 2 STORY ON MANTER Turf Play Area (SF) 111,000 SF Hard Surface Play 4,200 SF Area (SF) Structured Play 8,720 SF Area (SF) TOTAL 123,920 SF * Parking Spaces 70 Parent Drop off 295 (LF) PROJECTED COST CONSTRUCTION COST: $37,999,000 – $40,659,485 PDP CONSTRUCTION COST: $40,899,064

  28. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, MANTER SITE| FLOOR PLANS FIRST FLOOR PLAN

  29. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, MANTER SITE| FLOOR PLANS SECOND FLOOR PLAN

  30. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, MANTER SITE| VIEWS EAST VIEW EAST ELEVATION

  31. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, MANTER SITE| MASSING

  32. NEW 3‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| SITE PLAN NEW 3 STORY ON TISBURY Turf Play Area (SF) 73,205 SF Hard Surface Play 4,200 SF Area (SF) Structured Play 16,113 SF Area (SF) TOTAL 93,518 SF * Parking Spaces 70 Parent Drop off 297 (LF) PROJECTED COST CONSTRUCTION COST: $35,379,000 ‐ $38,379,903 PDP CONSTRUCTION COST: $ N/A

  33. NEW 3‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| FLOOR PLANS FIRST FLOOR PLAN

  34. NEW 3‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| FLOOR PLANS SECOND FLOOR PLAN

  35. NEW 3‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| FLOOR PLANS THIRD FLOOR PLAN

  36. NEW 3‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| VIEWS SOUTH WEST VIEW WEST ELEVATION

  37. NEW 3‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| MASSING

  38. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| SITE PLAN NEW 2 STORY ON TISBURY Turf Play Area (SF) 63,499 SF Hard Surface Play 4,200 SF Area (SF) Structured Play 12,613 SF Area (SF) TOTAL 80,312 SF * Parking Spaces 58 Parent Drop off 325 (LF) PROJECTED COST CONSTRUCTION COST: $35,554,000 ‐ $38,653,069 PDP CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 40,677,692

  39. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| FLOOR PLANS FIRST FLOOR PLAN

  40. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| FLOOR PLANS SECOND FLOOR PLAN

  41. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| VIEWS SOUTH WEST VIEW WEST ELEVATION

  42. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| MASSING

  43. ADDITION‐RENOVATION| SITE PLAN ADD/RENO ON TISBURY Turf Play Area (SF) 65,037 SF Hard Surface Play 3,522 SF Area (SF) Structured Play Area 11,793 SF (SF) TOTALS: 80,352 SF * Parking Spaces 80 Parent Drop off (LF) 358 PROJECTED COST CONSTRUCTION COST: $35,634,000 ‐ $39,420,168 PDP CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 39,771,397

  44. ADDITION‐RENOVATION| FLOOR PLANS FIRST FLOOR PLAN

  45. ADDITION‐RENOVATION| FLOOR PLANS SECOND FLOOR PLAN

  46. ADDITION‐RENOVATION| FLOOR PLANS THIRD FLOOR PLAN

  47. ADDITION‐RENOVATION| VIEWS SOUTH VIEW SOUTH ELEVATION

  48. ADDITION‐RENOVATION| MASSING

  49. BASE REPAIR| EXISTING ON TISBURY Turf Play Area (SF) 93,224 SF Hard Surface Play 3,366 SF Area (SF) Structured Play Area 6,075 SF (SF) TOTALS: 102,665 SF * Parking Spaces 71 Parent Drop off (LF) 165 PROJECTED COST CONSTRUCTION COST: $17,111,554 ‐ $23,248,000 PDP CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 17,119,724

Recommend


More recommend