TIP Modifications | SLIDE
Lehi – 700 S/Rail Trail Phase III • Utah County - Rail Trail Phase III • Selected 2012 • $1,379,599 - STP P/O • Delayed by ROW issues • Bids came in 15% above estimates • Contingency and additional funds have been applied • Road project delayed by this project. | SLIDE 2
Lehi – 700 S/Rail Trail Phase III • Lehi - 700 S Cycle Track • Selected 2014 • $3,283,550 - CMAQ • Set to begin in 2020 • Portions of the project have already been done since selection | SLIDE 3
| SLIDE 4
Lehi – 700 S/Rail Trail Phase III Lehi’s Request • Transfer up to $300,000 from the existing Lehi 700 South Cycle- Track project to the Rail Trail project. Motion- “I move that the transfer request be approved, and the TIP be modified, as necessary.” | SLIDE 5
Spanish Fork- Provo Sub Railroad Scope Mod. • Selected 2016 • $669,780 – MAG Exchange in 2021 • Engineering Design, Environmental other Fees • No foreseeable funding to complete the project ($23M) • Union Pacific permitting has slowed significantly | SLIDE 6
Spanish Fork- Provo Sub Railroad Scope Mod. • Approved development along the rail line • Need to purchase ROW • Not eligible for corridor preservation funds | SLIDE 7
Spanish Fork- Provo Sub Railroad Scope Mod. Timeline • 2015 – Development was approved. • 2016 – Railroad consultant indicated the need for additional ROW in this location. • 2016 - Developer modified the plat but needs to be compensated. | SLIDE 8
Spanish Fork- Provo Sub Railroad Scope Mod. Request – • Add ROW acquisition to the scope of the project • Remaining funds will be used to begin permitting process. Motion – “I move that the scope of the Provo Sub Railroad project be modified to include ROW acquisition. “ | SLIDE 9
2020 TIP Selection Process Improvements | SLIDE
2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) • The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) lists all funded regional transportation projects (MPO, UDOT, UTA, locals) • The MPO selects projects for State Exchange Funds, MPO Federal Funds, County Transportation Sales Tax Funds every two years. • Next Selection cycle will begin this fall. • New projects will be funded in 2023 and 2024 • Approximately $75m to $85m. • Each cycle - review the adjust the process to make it better. | SLIDE 11
| SLIDE 12
Process Improvement Discussion 1. Inclusion on local plans 2. Airport eligibility 3. Formula distribution of funds 4. Cost estimates and scope 5. TAC scoring to be public 6. Combination of MAG staff and TAC scores. 2020 SELECTION PROCESS | SLIDE 13
Process Improvement – 1 Project must be adopted in a local plan. (General plan, master transportation plan, MAG Staff and TAC capital improvements plan or other Recommendation similar documents) Yes | SLIDE 14
Process Improvement – 2 (Provo) Airport projects are eligible. (Must be a capacity increasing project) 2020 SELECTION PROCESS | SLIDE 15
Process Improvement – 3 (Orem) Formula distribution of funds. County funds would be distributed by population. 2020 SELECTION PROCESS | SLIDE 16
Process Improvement – 4 Cost estimates and scope may be reviewed by a third party. 2020 SELECTION PROCESS | SLIDE 17
Process Improvement – 5 Results of the project selection voting will be made public after the voting is completed. 2020 SELECTION PROCESS | SLIDE 18
Process Improvement – 6 MAG staff scoring will be added to the TAC score to rank each project and create the initial project list. 75% TAC – 25% MAG Staff 2020 SELECTION PROCESS | SLIDE 19
Recommended Motion “I move that the TIP project selection process be amended as presented. “ | SLIDE 20
Process Improvement Discussion Next Steps • Staff will make the proposed changes to the MAG TIP Project Selection Policies. • Project Kickoff meetings for TAC and RPC next month. 2020 SELECTION PROCESS | SLIDE 21
Thank you! Please start discussing potential projects with your staff. Contact MAG staff if you would like developing a project application. | SLIDE 22
23
FORMULA DISTRIBUTION 10 Year MAG Fund Distribution 2013 - 2022 County Sales Tax Funds All MAG Funds (county, fed, state) Census Pop. Current Process Proposed Distribution by Pop. Proposed Distribution by Tax. Current Process Prop. Dist. By Pop. 10yr Change 2018 % Fund Dist. % Funds % Funds Funds Sales Tax Funds All MPO % All MPO % Distribute by Distribute by Population Pop 10yr Funds 10yr Funds Annual 10yr % Annual Funds 10yr Funds Funds 10 yr Funds Population Sales Tax Provo 116,702 18.8% 57.3m 32.3% 33.3m 18.8% 3.3m 30.4m 17.17% 3.0m 78.2m 24.0% 54.2m 16.7% -24.0m -26.8m Orem 97,521 15.7% 36.5m 20.6% 27.8m 15.7% 2.8m 35.4m 19.99% 3.5m 61.7m 19.0% 53.0m 16.3% -8.7m -1.1m Lehi 66,037 10.6% 18.3m 10.3% 18.8m 10.6% 1.9m 20.3m 11.43% 2.0m 23.4m 7.2% 23.9m 7.3% 483k 1.9m Spanish Fork 39,961 6.4% 9.4m 5.3% 11.4m 6.4% 1.1m 12.5m 7.03% 1.2m 22.5m 6.9% 24.5m 7.5% 2.0m 3.1m Pleasant Grove 38,428 6.2% 330k 0.2% 11.0m 6.2% 1.1m 9.5m 5.37% 952k 3.0m 0.9% 13.6m 4.2% 10.6m 9.2m Eagle Mountain 35,616 5.7% 1.4m 0.8% 10.2m 5.7% 1.0m 6.6m 3.70% 656k 16.6m 5.1% 25.3m 7.8% 8.7m 5.1m Springville 33,104 5.3% 4.9m 2.8% 9.4m 5.3% 943k 9.2m 5.18% 919k 8.0m 2.5% 12.6m 3.9% 4.5m 4.3m American Fork 32,519 5.2% 2.0m 1.1% 9.3m 5.2% 927k 13.6m 7.69% 1.4m 9.2m 2.8% 16.5m 5.1% 7.3m 11.7m Saratoga Springs 31,393 5.0% 4.1m 2.3% 8.9m 5.0% 895k 7.2m 4.06% 720k 6.4m 2.0% 11.2m 3.4% 4.8m 3.1m Payson 19,826 3.2% 226k 0.1% 5.7m 3.2% 565k 5.4m 3.06% 543k 422k 0.1% 5.8m 1.8% 5.4m 5.2m Highland 19,183 3.1% 2.8m 1.6% 5.5m 3.1% 547k 3.9m 2.18% 387k 2.8m 0.9% 5.5m 1.7% 2.7m 1.1m Santaquin 12,274 2.0% 388k 0.2% 3.5m 2.0% 350k 2.3m 1.29% 229k 5.6m 1.7% 8.7m 2.7% 3.1m 1.9m Lindon 10,970 1.8% 1.1m 0.6% 3.1m 1.8% 313k 6.9m 3.87% 686k 2.1m 0.7% 4.2m 1.3% 2.0m 5.8m Alpine 10,504 1.7% 0 0.0% 3.0m 1.7% 299k 2.1m 1.21% 215k 95k 0.0% 3.1m 0.9% 3.0m 2.1m Cedar Hills 10,217 1.6% 0 0.0% 2.9m 1.6% 291k 2.3m 1.28% 227k 0k 0.0% 2.9m 0.9% 2.9m 2.3m Mapleton 10,168 1.6% 0 0.0% 2.9m 1.6% 290k 2.0m 1.11% 197k 7.8m 2.4% 10.7m 3.3% 2.9m 2.0m Vineyard 10,052 1.6% 0 0.0% 2.9m 1.6% 286k 1.6m 0.90% 160k 0 0.0% 2.9m 0.9% 2.9m 1.6m Salem 8,469 1.4% 0 0.0% 2.4m 1.4% 241k 1.8m 1.00% 177k 75k 0.0% 2.5m 0.8% 2.4m 1.8m Utah County 8,428 1.4% 35.7m 20.2% 2.4m 1.4% 240k 2.8m 1.57% 278k 40.8m 12.5% 7.4m 2.3% -33.3m -33.0m Elk Ridge 4,053 0.7% 0 0.0% 1.2m 0.7% 116k 674k 0.38% 67k 0 0.0% 1.2m 0.4% 1.2m 674k Draper 2,198 0.4% 0 0.0% 626k 0.4% 63k 0k 0.00% 0k 0 0.0% 626k 0.2% 626k 0k Woodland Hills 1,567 0.3% 0 0.0% 447k 0.3% 45k 284k 0.16% 28k 0 0.0% 447k 0.1% 447k 284k Genola 1,549 0.2% 0 0.0% 441k 0.2% 44k 355k 0.20% 35k 0 0.0% 441k 0.1% 441k 355k Goshen 936 0.2% 0 0.0% 267k 0.2% 27k 177k 0.10% 18k 0 0.0% 267k 0.1% 267k 177k Cedar Fort 397 0.1% 0 0.0% 113k 0.1% 11k 89k 0.05% 9k 0 0.0% 113k 0.0% 113k 89k Fairfield 141 0.0% 0 0.0% 40k 0.0% 4k 35k 0.02% 4k 0 0.0% 40k 0.0% 40k 35k Mountainland 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0k 0.00% 0k 11.2m 3.4% 11.2m 0.0344 0 0k UDOT 0 0.0% 0 0 0k 0.00% 0k 12.1m 3.7% 12.1m 0.0371 0 0.0k UTA 2.8m 1.6% 0 0 0k 0.00% 0k 13.4m 4.1% 10.6m 0.0326 -2.8m -2.8m Total County 622,213 100% 177.3m 100% 177.3m 100% 17.7m 177.3m 100.0000% 17.7m 325.3m 100% 325.3m 100% 0 0 | SLIDE
Realities • State law - Only regional, new capacity projects are eligible ( No maintenance) • Projects would still have to be approved by the MPO and County Commission ( Not money transfer) • Cities cannot bond against these funds • Would not start until 2023 • Cities receive formula B&C Road Funds and the new 4 th quarter cent sales tax | SLIDE 25
Projected 4 th Quarter Revenue Projected 4 th Annual City % of total Sales Revenue Orem 19.97% $ 1,970,021 Provo 17.17% $ 1,693,544 Lehi 11.43% $ 1,127,733 • Cities can bond against these AF 7.69% $ 759,086 SF 7.03% $ 693,836 funds PG 5.37% $ 529,761 Springville 5.18% $ 510,873 • About 60% to 70% of the Orem SS 4.06% $ 400,966 Lindon 3.87% $ 382,135 proposal EM 3.70% $ 364,830 Payson 3.06% $ 302,277 Highland 2.18% $ 215,128 UT co 1.57% $ 154,704 Santaquin 1.29% $ 127,605 CH 1.28% $ 125,839 Alpine 1.21% $ 119,710 Mapleton 1.11% $ 109,694 Salem 1.00% $ 98,756 Vineyard 0.90% $ 88,442 ER 0.38% $ 37,951 Genola 0.20% $ 19,710 WH 0.16% $ 16,100 Goshen 0.10% $ 9,373 CF 0.05% $ 4,912 Fairfield 0.02% $ 2,012 | SLIDE 26 Total 100.00% $ 9,864,997
Recommend
More recommend
