the role of national ecosystem
play

The role of national ecosystem assessments in influencing policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The role of national ecosystem assessments in influencing policy making Dr Claire Brown, Head of Ecosystem Assessment Programme The Aim Provide insights from experiences of the added value to policy making in undertaking an national ecosystem


  1. The role of national ecosystem assessments in influencing policy making Dr Claire Brown, Head of Ecosystem Assessment Programme

  2. The Aim Provide insights from experiences of the added value to policy making in undertaking an national ecosystem assessment 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 2 2013

  3. What is an ecosystem assessment  Links ecosystems, services and people  Connects different sectors  Communicates complex information  Engages stakeholders  Is not primary research! 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 3 2013

  4. Why conduct an ecosystem assessment  Respond to decision makers need for information  Highlight trade-offs between decision options  Model future prospects to avoid unseen, long term consequences  Provide critical judgement of options and uncertainty  Improve the way benefits of ecosystem services are described and valued  Help to build a bridge between development and environmental communities  Uncover and bring together a fragmented evidence base 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 4 2013

  5. Who conducts an ecosystem assessment 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 5 2013

  6. Challenges in undertaking an ecosystem assessment 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 6 2013

  7. Valuation of ecosystem services  The importance of ecosystem services can be measured in monetary and non monetary terms  Different values of human well-being:  Economic  Health  Social  A different way of looking at these might be:  Direct use  Indirect use  Non-use  Option values 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 7 2013

  8. Valuation steps 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 8 2013

  9. 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 9 2013

  10. The merits of monetary valuation  Makes the case for the conservation of natural capital  A common decision-making unit  Financial costs of policy options  Allows for comparisons of different benefits of ecosystem services using the same unit  Also can talk about the loss of ecosystem services 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 10 2013

  11. The limitations of monetary valuation  Can be contested and the usefulness is being discussed in many different circles  Technical challenges  robust and exact values  double counting  understanding of ecological relationships  tipping points  Fundamental objections of putting monetary value on nature  money as a human welfare indicator 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 11 2013

  12. Non-monetary valuation  Qualitative methods to demonstrated social benefits  Multi criterion assessment – combine different types of values  Still a growing area of research on how these can be measured and communicated 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 12 2013

  13. Policy Impacts 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 13 2013

  14. EU Working Group on Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services  Action 5 improve knowledge of ecosystems and their services in the EU • mapping and assessing the state of ecosystems and their services in country by 2014 • assess economic value of services and promote integration into accounting and reporting by 2020  Anticipated will contribute to the internalisation of ecosystem services safe guarding into design and implementation of different policies 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 14 2013

  15. Spanish National Ecosystem Assessment  First Phase 2009-2012:  Second phase 2013 –  socio-economic valuation  increase impact into policy  Breakdown barriers and build bridges between scientific knowledge and decision making  Awareness rising , including business sector  Helps underpin the Spanish Biodiversity Strategy 2011-2017 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 15 2013

  16. Portugal Millennium Ecosystem Assessment  Catalysed the incorporation of the ecosystem services into several legal documents, such as • Legal Regime of Nature and Biodiversity Conservation • National Strategy for the Forest • Management Plans of Protected Areas  Undertaking a TEEB-like assessment  Includes future scenarios and modelling  Policy analysis include green accounting 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 16 2013

  17. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Outlines the commitments for the environment, including:  Natural Capital committee  Committed to supporting a new international coalition of business coordinated by the TEEB for Business Coalition  New Nature Improvement Areas  Follow up Phase 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 17 2013

  18. UK NEA Lessons Learned  Policy impact  Data and advice  Governance structure  Team Familiarisation  Management and communication 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 18 2013

  19. Practical guidance for successful ecosystem assessments  Define clear, policy relevant questions  Carefully plan and set boundaries of scope and scale  Be inclusive  Apply a clear governance structure  Promote the assessment concept  Understand the decision-making context  Exchange with experts  Use and present different types of information 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 19 2013

  20. Acknowledgements • Lucy Wilson • Cristina Secades • Ulf Narloch • Nadine Bowles-Newark • Hollie Booth • Megan Tierney Contact: claire.brown@unep-wcmc.org Sub-global Assessment Network: www.ecosystemassessments.net 15 February, National Ecosystem Assessments and Policy Making 20 2013

Recommend


More recommend