the infn projec t
play

The INFN Projec t Marcello A. Giorgi INFN& - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The INFN Projec t Marcello A. Giorgi INFN& Universit di Pisa Joint EPS-ECFA session @ EPS HEP 2011 Grenoble July 23,2011 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 1 Approved ! SuperB has been approved as the first in a list of 14


  1. The INFN Projec t Marcello A. Giorgi INFN& Università di Pisa Joint EPS-ECFA session @ EPS HEP 2011 Grenoble July 23,2011 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 1

  2. Approved ! SuperB has been approved as the first in a list of 14 “flagship” projects within the new national research plan (December 2010). The national research plan has been endorsed by “CIPE” (the institution responsible for infrastructure long term plans) (April 2011). A financial allocation of 250 M € in about five years has been approved for the “superb flavour factory”. At the end of 2010 an initial sum of 19 M € has been allocated. A sum of the order of 50 M € is expected in 2011 budget. 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 2

  3. Priorities The site choice The management plan The governance model The WBS Start Spending for: Integrating the team: enrollment of new people Civil engineering projects Preliminary site related works The transition from TDR to construction phase 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 3

  4. Site Requirements defined in a document by the collaboration and reviewed by an International Review Committee: • Size • Electric power supply • Water for cooling • Low ground vibrations. • Close to INFN and other research infrastructures. Preferred: inside LNF or nearby . 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 4

  5. Options considered LNF but: • Need to go deep underground Enea • Surface space strongly constrained • Half below the “ Enea ” lab • Strong limitations on possible light source beamlines • More difficult evolution into an international structure INFN Other locations far from LNF : • Piemonte ( near Torino) • Sardinia • Campania • Puglia And in the Rome area: Private land (green field) The campus of Tor Vergata (one big University not a Green Field) 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 5

  6. Tor Vergata Choice A letter from the Rector on May 28,2011 has made the site available The decision to move with this solution was taken by the May 29 INFN board of directors . The site has been decided ! It is not a GREEN FIELD! Site About 4.5 Km LNF 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 6

  7. Organization & Structure : 3 Phases 1. – INFN: the past and present phase – Consortium: as soon as possible as an independent legal entity • More flexibility in the organisation • Can directly associate foreign partners (EGO like) • An “intermediate solution” – Initial partners: INFN, Tor Vergata and soon IIT – European consortium (ERIC): the final structure 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 7

  8. Governance Cern like organisation – A director general and a directorate • Departments under director’s supervision – Scientific evaluation committee • Science • Machine – Finance evaluation committee A known and working scheme! 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 8

  9. Governance Cern like organisation – A director general and a directorate • Departments under director’s supervision – Scientific evaluation committee • Science • Machine – Finance evaluation committee A known and working scheme! The Name of the Structure Cabibbo Lab 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 9

  10. Meanwhile • Moving towards the completion of TDR. • Machine parameters are stable. • Detector R&D is in an advanced status, of testing on beam the prototypes • A well integrated group of theorists and experimentalists is focusing on the program for discovery with a careful evaluation of sensitivities and looking at interplay between different measurements looking at complementarities of various flavor measurements. 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 10

  11. REQUIREMENTS FROM PHYSICS Parameter Requirement Comment 10 36 cm -2 s -1 @ U (4 S ) Luminosity (top-up mode) Baseline/Flexibility with headroom at 4. 10 36 cm -2 s -1 75 ab -1 Integrated luminosity Based on a “New Snowmass Year” of 1.5 x 10 7 seconds (PEP-II & KEKB experience-based)  threshold to CM energy range For Charm special runs (still U (5 S ) asymmetric……) bg ≈0.237 Minimum boost 1 cm beam pipe radius. First ~(4.18x6.7GeV) measured point at 1.5 cm e - Polarization Enables  CP and T violation studies, ≥80% measurement of  g -2 and improves Boost up to 0.9 in runs at sensitivity to lepton flavor-violating low energy under evaluation decays. Detailed simulation, needed for charm physics to ascertain a more precise requirement, are in progress. 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 11

  12. Collider Parameters are “stable” LER arc HER arc HER Energy: FF RF 6.7 GeV Polarization l * ~ 0.5m 80% for e - I.P. LER Energy: 4.2 GeV e+ FF e- LER arc HER 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 12 arc

  13. Future Super B Factories ( goal is 75 ab -1 in 5 years) Or Super KEKB Peak Luminosity >10 36 0.8 x 10 36 Integrated 75 ab -1 50 ab -1 Luminosity Site Tor Vergata Campus KEKB Laboratory Collisions mid 2016 2015 Polarization 80% electron beam No Low energy 10 35 @ charm threshold No running Approval status Approved Approved 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 13

  14. is then the tool for unique quality measurements Experiment: No Result Moderate Precision Precise Very Precise Theory: Moderately clean Clean Need lattice Clean Physics Group Benefit from polarised e − beam very precise with improved detector Statistically limited: Ang. analysis with >75ab -1 Right handed currents SuperB measures many more modes systematic error is main challenge control systematic error with data SuperB measures e mode well, LHCb does μ Clean NP search Theoretically clean 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 14 b fragmentation limits interpretation

  15. END 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 15

  16. SuperB Luminosity model 30.00 Peak Luminosity (10^35) 20.00 10.00 0.00 100.00 Integrated Luminosity(1/ab) 80.00 75 ab -1 60.00 40.00 20.00 0.00 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 7/23/2011 M.A.Giorgi 16

Recommend


More recommend