testing stringy non gaussianity
play

TESTING STRINGY NON-GAUSSIANITY Sarah Shandera Columbia University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TESTING STRINGY NON-GAUSSIANITY Sarah Shandera Columbia University arXiv:0711.4126 (M. LoVerde, A. Miller, S.S., L. Verde) arXiv:0802.2290 (L. Leblond, S.S.) String Pheno, 2008 NOT ONLY THE LHC... Galaxy Surveys: SZA, ACT, SPT B-mode


  1. TESTING STRINGY NON-GAUSSIANITY Sarah Shandera Columbia University arXiv:0711.4126 (M. LoVerde, A. Miller, S.S., L. Verde) arXiv:0802.2290 (L. Leblond, S.S.) String Pheno, 2008

  2. NOT ONLY THE LHC... Galaxy Surveys: SZA, ACT, SPT B-mode polarization: PLANCK QUIET, EBEX, (Nov?) String Pheno, 2008

  3. STRING COSMOLOGY String theory is a likely place to look for models of very early universe physics: inflation or any alternatives String theory has already provided new ideas for cosmologists (e.g. slow-roll is hard) Depending on scales, Hubble vs. (warped) string, there may be signatures of stringy physics Much more observational information is on its way - potential to uncover interesting (and discriminating) features: non-Gaussianity String Pheno, 2008

  4. PLAN Non-Gaussianity: Why? Qualitative features. What physics is probed by those qualitative features? Potential of near-future observations String Pheno, 2008

  5. PLAN Non-Gaussianity: Why? Qualitative features. What physics is probed by those qualitative features? Potential of near-future observations Focus on scale-dependence, a consequence and probe of warped extra dimensions String Pheno, 2008

  6. I. NON-GAUSSIANITY

  7. PHENO PICTURE 67,*-73&8"70-7,-)#*/ V( φ ) V( ) ! !"#$ ! %#""&%'()#* 2,34'5 ./0)"",-)#*/1 %'+',-)*( φ ! String Pheno, 2008

  8. PHENO PICTURE 67,*-73&8"70-7,-)#*/ V( φ ) V( ) ! !"#$ ! %#""&%'()#* 2,34'5 ./0)"",-)#*/1 %'+',-)*( φ ! D ( k 1 + k 2 )(2 π 2 k − 3 ) P ζ ( k ) � ζ ( k 1 ) ζ ( k 2 ) � = (2 π ) 3 δ 3 Curvature String Pheno, 2008

  9. PHENO PICTURE Amplitude 67,*-73&8"70-7,-)#*/ P ζ ≈ 10 − 9 V( φ ) V( ) ! !"#$ ! %#""&%'()#* Scale-dependence 2,34'5 ./0)"",-)#*/1 %'+',-)*( P ζ ( k ) ∝ k n s − 1 φ ! D ( k 1 + k 2 )(2 π 2 k − 3 ) P ζ ( k ) � ζ ( k 1 ) ζ ( k 2 ) � = (2 π ) 3 δ 3 Curvature String Pheno, 2008

  10. NON-GAUSSIANITY Gaussian: all higher order, connected, n -point functions are zero Fluctuations are exactly Gaussian only for free fields; we know this can’t be true of the inflaton (nearly flat potential usually means nearly free) Non-zero 3-point is a first check (expect it to be easiest to measure) String Pheno, 2008

  11. NON-GAUSSIANITY Gaussian: all higher order, connected, n -point functions are zero Fluctuations are exactly Gaussian only for free fields; we know this can’t be true of the inflaton (nearly flat potential usually means nearly free) Non-zero 3-point is a first check (expect it to be easiest to measure) � ζ ( k 1 ) ζ ( k 2 ) ζ ( k 3 ) � = (2 π ) 3 δ 3 D ( k 1 + k 2 + k 3 ) B ( k 1 , k 2 , k 3 ) String Pheno, 2008

  12. STRING EXAMPLES Multiple fields...Many! Single field with additional structure D3/D7 + cosmic strings (Haack, Kallosh, Krause, Linde, Lust, Zagermann); Any field + sharp features in the potential/geometry (Chen, Easther, Lim; Bean, Chen, Hailu, Tye, Xu); deviations from Bunch-Davies (short inflation) (Holman,Tolley); Landscape inflation (Tye) Single field with derivative interactions DBI brane inflation; p-adic (Silverstein, Tong; Barnaby, Cline) String Pheno, 2008

  13. OBSERVABLES Real space or k-space correlation functions � CMB or galaxy bispectrum k 1 � k 2 � k 3 Sensitive to detailed model Probability density function Count very large objects (galaxy clusters) Sensitive to over-all amount (and sign, scaling,...) of NG String Pheno, 2008

  14. INFLATON TO DENSITY Inflaton Curvature δ φ ζ Curvature Density σ ζ δ Density Structure Gaussian δ Non-Gaussian Non-Gaussian String Pheno, 2008

  15. QUALITATIVE FEATURES Amplitude (how non-Gaussian?) Shape (largest for which triangles?) Sign (positively skewed?) Scale-dependence (growing or shrinking on small scales?) Each of these features can rule out large classes of models String Pheno, 2008

  16. QUALITATIVE FEATURES Amplitude (how non-Gaussian?) Slow roll Shape (largest for which triangles?) Sign (positively skewed?) Scale-dependence (growing or shrinking on small scales?) Each of these features can rule out large classes of models String Pheno, 2008

  17. QUALITATIVE FEATURES X Amplitude (how non-Gaussian?) Slow roll (Maldacena) Shape (largest for which triangles?) Sign (positively skewed?) Scale-dependence (growing or shrinking on small scales?) Each of these features can rule out large classes of models String Pheno, 2008

  18. QUALITATIVE FEATURES X Amplitude (how non-Gaussian?) Slow roll (Maldacena) Shape (largest for which triangles?) Derivative terms Sign (positively skewed?) Scale-dependence (growing or shrinking on small scales?) Each of these features can rule out large classes of models String Pheno, 2008

  19. QUALITATIVE FEATURES X Amplitude (how non-Gaussian?) Slow roll (Maldacena) X Shape (largest for which triangles?) Derivative terms Sign (positively skewed?) Scale-dependence (growing or shrinking on small scales?) Each of these features can rule out large classes of models String Pheno, 2008

  20. QUALITATIVE FEATURES X Amplitude (how non-Gaussian?) Slow roll (Maldacena) X Shape (largest for which triangles?) Derivative terms DBI Sign (positively skewed?) Scale-dependence (growing or shrinking on small scales?) Each of these features can rule out large classes of models String Pheno, 2008

  21. QUALITATIVE FEATURES X Amplitude (how non-Gaussian?) Slow roll (Maldacena) X Shape (largest for which triangles?) Derivative terms X DBI Sign (positively skewed?) Scale-dependence (growing or shrinking on small scales?) Each of these features can rule out large classes of models String Pheno, 2008

  22. QUALITATIVE FEATURES X Amplitude (how non-Gaussian?) Slow roll (Maldacena) X Shape (largest for which triangles?) Derivative terms X DBI Sign (positively skewed?) Scale-dependence (growing or shrinking on small scales?) Local model Each of these features can rule out large classes of models String Pheno, 2008

  23. QUALITATIVE FEATURES X Amplitude (how non-Gaussian?) Slow roll (Maldacena) X Shape (largest for which triangles?) Derivative terms X DBI Sign (positively skewed?) Scale-dependence (growing or shrinking on small X scales?) Local model Each of these features can rule out large classes of models String Pheno, 2008

  24. II. PHYSICS PROBED: DERIVATIVE INTERACTIONS AND DBI

  25. GENERAL SET-UP Action is a function of a single field and its first derivatives S = 1 � d 4 x √− g [ M 2 p R − 2 P ( X, φ )] 2 X = − 1 2 g µ ν ∂ µ φ∂ ν φ Sound speed P ,X c 2 s = P ,X + 2 XP ,XX Armendariz-Picon, Damour, Mukhanov; Garriga, Mukhanov String Pheno, 2008

  26. EXAMPLE CASE: DBI P ,X = c − 1 = γ s D3 R 1 γ ( φ ) = � 1 − f ( φ ) ˙ φ 2 ρ 0 -4A r 0 , e 0 φ 2 < f ( φ ) − 1 = Sh ( φ ) − 1 ˙ h ≈ R 4 r 4 = R 4 T 2 3 φ 4 String Pheno, 2008

  27. THE PARAMETERS Non-Gaussianity NL ∝ 1 f eff c 2 s Scale-dependence of the sound speed � k � κ c s ( k ) = c s ( k 0 ) k 0 (Seery, Lidsey; Chen, Huang, Kachru, Shiu) String Pheno, 2008

  28. REASON TO KNOW UV PHYSICS I Suppose we have an action (Creminelli) X 2 X 3 P ( X, φ ) = − V ( φ ) + X + a 1 M 4 + a 2 M 8 + . . . Then X/M 4 ≪ 1 ⇒ c 2 s ∼ O (a few × 10 − 1 ) f eff NL ∝ 1 /c 2 s ∼ O (1) But for DBI, we know the sum � P ( X, φ ) = − f ( φ ) 1 − 2 Xf − 1 ( φ ) + f ( φ ) − V ( φ ) String Pheno, 2008

  29. REASON TO KNOW UV PHYSICS II ‘EFT’ for the inflaton, perturbative calculations from the general sound speed action breaks down when c 4 s ∼ P ζ ∼ 10 − 9 (Cheung, Creminelli, Fitzpatrick, Kaplan, Senatore; Leblond, S.S.) Warped deformed conifold: warp factor goes to a constant and we can use string theory to understand c 4 s < P ζ (talks by Klebanov;) String Pheno, 2008

  30. III. OBSERVATIONAL PROSPECTS

  31. NG ON A RANGE OF SCALES Larger κ = − 0 . 3 range of scales = κ = − 0 . 1 Larger range of geometry String Pheno, 2008

  32. OBSERVATIONS: CLUSTERS Count the number of very large objects (several sigma fluctuations) Sensitive to magnitude of non-Gaussianity on the smallest ‘linear’ scales If NG is large at CMB scales and or has a large running, upcoming surveys can constrain it. LoVerde, Miller, S.S., Verde String Pheno, 2008

  33. SUMMARY Observations will soon be powerful enough to probe interactions of the inflaton Models of inflation from string theory have a range of interactions with surprising features Scale dependent non-Gaussianity, observable by combining CMB and large scale structure data, is a useful qualitative feature: most optimistic case, probes geometry of extra dimensions Large non-Gaussianity would require interesting physics String Pheno, 2008

Recommend


More recommend