Team 1803 - 3 level Inverter 1700V Switching JOHN BROUSSEAU(EE), - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

team 1803 3 level inverter 1700v switching
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Team 1803 - 3 level Inverter 1700V Switching JOHN BROUSSEAU(EE), - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lenze Americas Team 1803 - 3 level Inverter 1700V Switching JOHN BROUSSEAU(EE), DANIEL DABKOWSKI(EE), YUANSONG LIU(EE) ADVISOR: PROFESSOR BAZZI Outline Background on Inverters Problem Statement Specifications and Require


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lenze Americas Team 1803 - 3 level Inverter 1700V Switching

JOHN BROUSSEAU(EE), DANIEL DABKOWSKI(EE), YUANSONG LIU(EE) ADVISOR: PROFESSOR BAZZI

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

 Background on Inverters  Problem Statement  Specifications and Require  Approach  Capacitive Coupling  Logic Based Approach  Mixed Approach  Simulation Results  Hardware Results  Upcoming Plans  Timeline

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Inverters

 A power inverter is an electronic device that performs DC to AC

conversion

 A three-phase, two-level inverter varies the line to line output

voltage between Vdc, -Vdc, and 0

 A three-phase, three-level inverter can vary the output between

Vdc, Vdc/2, 0, -Vdc/2, and -Vdc

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Two level inverter output Three level inverter output

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Problem Statement

Some parts of Canada and the United States use

600 Vrms systems

Inverters designed for this market normally used 1400 V

transistors

These Transistors are being phased out Nearest equivalents are 1200 V and 1700 V transistors 1700 V transistors do not switch fast enough for the

application

1200 V transistors will fail due to high voltage stress

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Lenze wants to use a 3 level inverter topology to do two level switching Transistors would be paired, and switched together as a two level inverter The transistors share the load These transistors do not have the same turn on and turn off characteristics They may still experience

  • vervoltage conditions
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Specifications and Requirements

 $2000 budget for this project, main cost will be power

MOSFETs ~$5 each, and PCB

 Simulation of 600 VRMS (850VDC) 3 HP three level

inverter: characterize losses, select components, find

  • utput waveform, and demonstrate voltage sharing

 Scaled down simulation to 240 VRMS (340 VDC) 3 HP  Physical PCB, 240 VRMS input, 3 HP, interface with a

provided Lenze Variable Frequency Drive

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Simultaneous Switching

 Ideal case involves two series

MOSFETs switching simultaneously and evenly balancing the DC voltage, with both having on On-State VDS of VDC/2

 In practice, this is a concern

because each transistor will have slightly different characteristics, such as internal capacitances

 This will cause the transistors to

have different turn-on and turn-off times, which can cause excessive voltage stress across an individual transistor

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Approach Capacitive Coupling

 Utilizes one gate drive signal to power a stack of series

MOSFETs, two in our case

 When all transistors are off, the external resistors divide the

voltage load to not exceed the voltage rating of any one transistor

 Bottom transistor is switched on, which reverse biases the

diode, causing the gate-source voltage of M2 to be set by a capacitive division of C2 and internal gate-source capacitance of M2, which turns on M2, process repeats for each transistor in the stack

 Turn-off is opposite, C2 and internal gate-source

capacitance of M2 drain and turn off the transistor, which then happens for every other transistor in the stack

 Benefit of simplicity and few parts

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Approach Logic Based Solution

 Use solid state components to introduce

additional switching logic

 Sequence the transistors such that they do not

go into overvoltage states

 A combination of logic statements (Top) will

switch the transistors through a series of states (bottom) where there is never more than two on at one time

 Benefits: No risk of overvoltage, always know

which transistors will turn on or off next

 Drawbacks: Slower that switching simultaneously,

several additional parts

A = (NOT C) AND S1 B = (NOT D) AND ((NOT C) OR S1) C = (NOT A) AND ((NOT B) OR S2) D = (NOT B) AND s2

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Approach Mixed Solution

  • Mixed Approach uses a control signal to

determine if the inverter gates should be run in logic-control mode, or through capacitively coupled method

  • Hybrid of the two previous methods
  • Benefit of flexibility
  • Drawback of complexity, current

problem involving slew rates

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Logic Power MOSFETs Controls

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Simulation Results Capacitive Coupling

Good Voltage balancing across both transistors Minor turn-on transients

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Monte Carlo Analysis

Both are equal Top +20% Bottom -20% Top -20% Bottom +20% Max Vds Top 248 243 245 Max Vds bottom 226 226 226

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Simulation Results Logic Based Solution

 Using Simulink, we tested

what happened when one transistor consistently switched slower than the

  • ther three on a phase leg

 Normally, each transistor

  • perated at either VDC/2 or

0 V

 During each cycle, one

transistor spiked to VDC, as expected

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Simulation Results: Logic Continued

 Once the additional

switching logic was added, the transistors switched on and off in the desired sequence (Top)

 Additionally, the

sequenced switching had the desired effect of eliminating voltage spikes (Bottom)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Hardware Results Capacitive Coupling Method

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Upcoming Plans

 Finish hardware testing for capacitive coupling and logic based

method

 Finish simulation of mixed approach to determine feasibility  Purchase parts for three-phase, three-level inverter topology

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Timeline

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Questions