system assessment reports
play

System Assessment Reports Information Sessions January 2013 Todays - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

System Assessment Reports Information Sessions January 2013 Todays Presentation Updates to Nova Scotias Municipal Drinking Water Treatment Standards Updates to Terms of Reference for System Assessment Reports Questions


  1. System Assessment Reports – Information Sessions January 2013

  2. Today’s Presentation • Updates to Nova Scotia’s Municipal Drinking Water Treatment Standards • Updates to Terms of Reference for System Assessment Reports • Questions

  3. Nova Scotia’s Municipal Drinking Water Treatment Standards • First introduced in 2002 • Updated in 2012 to include: – Cryptosporidium as a target micro- organism for surface water and GUDI supplies • Chlorine resistant – Minimum requirements for alternate primary and secondary disinfectants – Minimum requirements for membrane filtration – Management of waste streams

  4. Nova Scotia’s Municipal Drinking Water Treatment Standards (cont’d) • Fundamentals: – Based on 3-log reduction for protozoa ( Giardia and Cryptosporidium ) and 4-log reduction for viruses – Filtration for all surface water and GUDI supplies – Disinfection for all supplies – Redundancy for critical processes – Continuous monitoring for critical processes – Management of waste streams

  5. Log Reduction Components • Log removal by physical treatment – Filtration for surface water and GUDI supplies – Performance indicator • Turbidity – Continuous monitoring • Log inactivation by disinfection – Applies to all supplies – Performance indicators • CT concept – chemical disinfectants – Continuous monitoring of chlorine residual • IT concept – UV disinfection – Continuous monitoring of intensity

  6. System Assessment Reports • Due April 1, 2013 • Last assessments were based on assumptions • These assessments must demonstrate performance – with turbidity criteria to be awarded log removal credits – with disinfection criteria to meet CT/IT – with continuous monitoring requirements – with discharge criteria for waste streams • Based on data from last calendar year – can be 2011 – no need to wait for 2012 data

  7. System Assessment Reports (cont’d) • Based on the multiple barrier and source to tap concepts – Source characterization – Treatment and distribution system – Operations and management

  8. Source Characterization – Section 2 • Section 2.1 – Source Description and Schematic – Describe primary source(s) – Describe any sources that are used as back-up supplies – Identify sources on a map – Document precautions for use of back-up supplies • Municipalities that purchase water from an adjoining system – Identify system connections on a map – Document the name of the municipal system that water is purchased from – Proceed to Section 2.3

  9. Microbial Risks – Section 2.2 • Surface Water – Section 2.2.1 – Summarize microbial risks – Summarize water quality variability • Turbidity • Colour • TOC • pH • Alkalinity • Temperature – Provide raw water coliform and protozoa data if available

  10. Microbial Risks – Section 2.2 (cont’d) • Groundwater – Section 2.2.2 – Verify classified in accordance with GUDI protocol – Summarize GUDI status by individual well – Discuss wells that are no longer in use if applicable – For GUDI wells • Table A.1 • MPA results • Protozoa data if available – Inspect the site to verify no changes to surrounding area – Provide raw water coliform data – Corrective action for wells • Qualified hydrogeologist per GUDI Protocol

  11. Chemical Risks – Section 2.3 • Disinfection by-products – Section 2.3.1 – THMs – HAAs – Others – Table 1 in Terms of Reference • Summarize concentrations – Tables A.2 and A.3 – Calculate locational running annual average based on a minimum of four quarterly samples • Exceedances require corrective action

  12. THMs and HAAs – Sampling Locations HAA formation • Identify sampling locations on a map Concentrations (ug/L) Free Chlorine (mg/L) • Verify sampling locations are appropriate THMs HAAs Chlorine Time (hours)

  13. Lead and Corrosion Control – Section 2.3.2 • Lead – Verify sampling locations and frequency is appropriate • Flushed samples • Stagnant samples – Identify sampling locations on a map • Corrosion control – Review the corrosion control program • Langelier Index is not an adequate measure of corrosivity – Summarize water quality results • Exceedances require corrective action

  14. Aluminum – Section 2.3.3 • For facilities using aluminum-based coagulants – Compare average of 12 monthly samples at treatment facility to stipulated limit • Exceedances require corrective action

  15. Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality – Section 2.3.4 • Table A.4 • Required every five years for raw and treated water • Verify that sampling locations and frequencies are appropriate • Detections require discussion and enhanced monitoring recommendations • Include lab reports from last round of sampling; indicate date for next round of sampling • Exceedances require corrective action

  16. Guidelines for Monitoring Public Drinking Water Supplies – Section 2.3.5 • Table A.5 • Verify that sampling locations and frequencies are appropriate for raw and treated water – Every year for surface water and GUDI – Every two years for groundwater • Discuss water quality trends • Include lab reports from last round of sampling • Exceedances require corrective action

  17. Source Water Protection Plan Monitoring – Section 2.3.6 • Step 5 of the source water protection program • Summarize parameters being monitored, sampling frequency, concentrations • Discuss water quality trends

  18. Filter Backwash Water – Section 2.4 • If backwash water is discharged upstream of raw water intake, document the impact on the source • If source is impacted, provide recommendations

  19. Source Quantity – Section 2.5 • Compile water withdrawal approvals – Include copy in Appendix • Complete Table A.6 to compare actual withdrawals to approved limits – Monthly withdrawal is m 3 (not m 3 /d) • Provide recommendations – If actual withdrawals exceed approved limits – If growth is forecast to increase withdrawals beyond approved limits

  20. Source Water Protection Plan – Section 2.6 • Identify protection zones on a map • Submit zones in GIS format • Summarize the status of the SWP plan and implementation schedule • Document the dates of the last two SWP meetings • Note the status of meeting actions and SWP plan deliverables • Make recommendations to address concerns

  21. Conclusions and Recommendations – Section 2 • Refer to Terms of Reference – pages 14 and 15 – Microbial risks – Chemical risks – Filter backwash water risks – Source quantity – Source water protection plan • Carry forward to Section 5

  22. Treatment Processes – Section 3 • Compile existing Approval(s) to Operate – Include copy in Appendix • Provide a schematic of treatment process – Source to treated water entering the distribution system

  23. Turbidity and Associated Criteria – Section 3.1.2 • Verify filtration meets turbidity limits – Mandatory to be awarded log removal credits • Surface Water – individual filter effluent turbidity values – Evaluating engineered filtration – 95 th /99 th percentile – If not achieved, recommend corrective action • GUDI – individual well turbidity values – Evaluating natural filtration – 1 NTU, 95 th percentile – If not achieved, contact NSE • Submission options – Calculated or graphed values

  24. Filter 2 Turbidity Measurements and Exceedances # of # of %age of %age of Readings Readings time time Readings exceeding exceeding below . below . /day .15NTU .20NTU 15 NTU 2NTU 708 0 0 1-Aug 100.00% 100.00% 1403 0 0 2-Aug 100.00% 100.00% 725 1 0 3-Aug 99.86% 100.00% 847 0 0 4-Aug 100.00% 100.00% 1241 0 0 5-Aug 100.00% 100.00% 702 2 0 6-Aug 99.72% 100.00% 1131 0 0 7-Aug 100.00% 100.00% 808 1 0 8-Aug 99.88% 100.00%

  25. Filtration Process – Other Requirements • Standard operating practices • Continuous monitoring, alarms, alerting • Inspect turbidimeter – Range, accuracy, maintenance, QA/QC • Redundancy – Surface water – Minimum of two filters • Membrane filtration – Section 3.1.3 – Table B.1 – Integrity testing – Organics rejection rate (if applicable)

  26. Non-GUDI Wells • Evaluating turbidity spikes – Daily grab or continuous measurement – 1 NTU, 95 th percentile – If not achieved, contact NSE • Submit turbidity values for individual wells or combined flow – Option 1: Calculated values – Option 2: Graphed values • Inspect measurement method – Continuous or grab

  27. Primary Disinfection – Section 3.1.4 • Document log inactivation required • Discuss how disinfection is achieved – Chemical disinfectant or UV • Provide a process schematic • Inspect the process and instrumentation – Redundancy (minimum of two units) – Continuous measurements, alarms, alerting – Range and accuracy – Maintenance, QA/calibration program • Standard operating procedures

  28. Primary Disinfection – Section 3.1.4 • Chlorine – Calculate CT – Verify never out of design range otherwise provide daily calculations • Ultraviolet light – Verify IT – Verify never outside of design range otherwise provide daily calculations • See Appendix D of Treatment Standards for CT/IT sample calculations

Recommend


More recommend