Status reports of intensive programs I. Cosmology with High-Redhisft - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

status reports of intensive programs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Status reports of intensive programs I. Cosmology with High-Redhisft - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

@Subaru UM Jan.2007 Status reports of intensive programs I. Cosmology with High-Redhisft Type Ia Supernovae S02B-I04 02B 10 nights II. Dark Energy Measurements using SNIa in Elliptical Galaxies S05B-137 05B 5 nights 06A 5 nights S06B-085


slide-1
SLIDE 1

@Subaru UM Jan.2007

Status reports of intensive programs

  • I. Cosmology with High-Redhisft Type Ia Supernovae

S02B-I04 02B 10 nights

  • II. Dark Energy Measurements using SNIa

in Elliptical Galaxies S05B-137 05B 5 nights 06A 5 nights S06B-085 06B 2 nights 07A 2 nights

Mamoru Doi (PI) University of Tokyo

slide-2
SLIDE 2

S02B-I04

Co-investigators

Mamoru Doi1, Naoki Yasuda2, Nobunari Kashikawa2 , Kentaro Motohara1, Tomoki Morokuma1, H.Furusawa2, K.Aoki2, Y.Ohyama2, K.Nomoto1, Saul Perlmutter3, Isobel Hook4, Reynald Pain5, Christpher Lidman6, Ariel Goobar7

SXDS Team

Suprime-Cam Group Supernova Cosmology Project Team

  • 1Univ. of Tokyo, 2NAOJ, 3LBNL, 4Oxford Univ., 5LPNHE,6ESO,7Univ. of Stochholm

S05B-137, S06B-085

Mamoru Doi1, Naoki Yasuda2, Tomonori Totani3, Nobunari Kashikawa2 , Kentaro Motohara1, Tomoki Morokuma1, Naohiro Takanashi1, Koichi Tokita1, Takashi Ihara1, H.Furusawa2, K.Aoki2, Y.Ohyama2, Saul Perlmutter4, Greg Aldering4, Christpher Lidman5, Ariel Goobar6

SXDF Team Supernova Cosmology Project Team

  • 1Univ. of Tokyo, 2NAOJ, 3Kyoto Univ., 4LBNL,5ESO,6Univ. of Stochholm
slide-3
SLIDE 3

I Measuring Expansion of the Universe with SNIa

Constant expansion Deceleration Acceleration ΩM, ΩR

ΩΛ “Empty” universe

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Results from “Standard Lod” measurements CMB and SDSS galaxy survey

ΩM

Dark Energy 75% Matter 25% Flat Universe Tegmark et al. 2006

(1st year results) ( 3 r d y e a r r e s u l t s )

ΩΛ

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ΩΛ (Dark Energy)

A big mystery even for Physics

d e n s i t y ρ∝a - 3 ( 1 + w ) cosmological constant: w = - 1 w = p/ρ= -1 : energy with “negative pressure”

Matter w=0 Radiation w=1/3

  • ∆E=∆V・p

pressure p ∆V Energy

= ½(ΩM-2ΩΛ+2ΩR)

Deceleration Parameter ρΛ ~ 7×10-30 g/cm3 → very small to measure at laboratory

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Measurements with SN Redshift and Distance time a ∝ (1+z)-1

slope H0

(time) = (distance)/c

present Flux photometry spectroscopy

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Type Ia Supernova

  • Standard Candle(Luminosity~constant)

→WD(@binary system) reached Chandrasekar limit (~1.4solar mass)

  • Large Luminosity (~whole galaxy)

→ measurable at cosmological distance ⇔ Core collapse SNe Type II, Ib, Ic By Takanashi,N. ~15% rms

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Recent Results from SNe

(Spergel et al. 2006)

ΩΛ~0.7 ΩM~0.3 CFHT MEGACAM & 8-10m telescopes for spectroscopy Astier et al. 2005 HST&previous data Riess et al. 2004 Riess et al. 2006

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • II. S02B-I04 (10 nights in 2002B)

FoV of ACS/HST

S u p r i m e - C a m :

T h e m o s t p o w e r f u l i m a g e r t o f i n d d i s t a n t S N e

~ 2 0 t i m e s m o r e e f f e c t i v e t h a n A C S @ H S T

F i e l d o f V i e w : x 1 0 0 i n t e g r a t i o n t i m e : ×1/5 (Yasuda et al. 2004, AAS)

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Schedules changed

  • riginal plan: FOCAS 4 nights , CISCO 6 nights,

Suprime-Cam 13 nights from SXDS, 2 nights from SN (←ToO) bad weather for Suprime-Cam search FOCAS 2 nights → Suprime-Cam 2 nights telescope actuator trouble FOCAS 1 night → CISCO 1 night CISCO troubles, Strong Astigmatism, etc. CISCO 4 nights → Suprime-Cam 2 nights filter trouble with Suprime-Cam … real schedule: FOCAS 1 night, CISCO 3? nights, Suprime-Cam 13 nights from SXDS, 6 nights from SN

→ optimized for light curve observations with Suprime-Cam

⇔ high quality measurements at z~1.2

slide-12
SLIDE 12

z=??? z=??? z=??? z=??? z=??? z=??? z=??? z=??? z=??? z=??? z=0.505 z=??? z=0.606 z=0.66 z=0.59 z=0.623 z=0.69 z=0.92 z=0.926 z=0.928 z=1.085 z=0.823 z=1.3? z=1.16? z=1.03 z=1.181 z=1.478 z=1.272

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Ia at z=1.18

SN+host at z=1.28 red FOCAS (7200sec) black HST/ACS(12000sec)

consistent (with VLT, Lidman et al. 2004)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Keck 0.269

  • SuF02-059

VLT 0.347? SN2002kz SuF02-028 Keck 0.505* SN2002kt SuF02-019 Keck Ia 0.57 SN2002ko SuF02-001 Keck 0.59 SN2002kw SuF02-077 VLT Ia 0.606* SN2002km SuF02-025 Keck 0.623* SN2002kx SuF02-082 Keck 0.66 SN2002ky SuF02-055 Keck 0.69

  • SuF02-021

VLT 0.823* SN2002kq SuF02-002 Keck 0.92* SN2002ku SuF02-000 Keck 0.926* SN2002kv SuF02-037 ISAAC △ Keck 0.928* SN2002kp SuF02-071 ISAAC/CISCO △ Keck/Gemini/VLT Ia? 1.03 SN2002kn SuF02-017 Keck/Subaru 1.08?

  • SuF02-061

NICMOS ○ VLT/Gemini Ia 1.063* SN2002kr SuF02-060 VLT/Subaru 1.14?

  • SuF02-007

NICMOS ○? VLT Ia 1.181* SN2002ks SuF02-065 VLT 1.272?

  • SuF02-083

NICMOS ○ Keck/VLT/Subaru/HST 1.3-1.5 SN2002lc SuF02-012 △ VLT 1.45-1.48?*

  • SuF02-081

J-band HST spectroscopy type redshift IAUC name

2002 Fall preliminary summary (spectroscopic sample)

*: host galaxy

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Ne found with Suprime-Cam

8 13 48 121 Total 3 5 27 44 2002 Fall 4 5 13 55 2002 Spring 1 3 8 22 2001 Spring HST followup Confir med SN Ia Spectr. Candidates

Final analysis On going

Supernova Cosmology Project follow-up observations with Keck, VLT, Gemini, HST

slide-16
SLIDE 16

HST ACS PSF (x, y, color, time) was not stable

  • Changes with
  • CCD (x, y)
  • SN Phase
  • Day / Night
  • Distortion(t)
  • + CTE

However, unexpectedly, By Naotaka Suzuki (LBNL) +4%

  • 4%

PSF Photometry

slide-17
SLIDE 17

HST ACS Time Dependent Distortion

slide-18
SLIDE 18

HST ACS: 2 Gyro Rotated Field

slide-19
SLIDE 19

SN Ia Light Curves still to be worked out

slide-20
SLIDE 20

A Survey for Faint Optical Variables

★ SXDF (this work) ~1100objects

HST 10-20 objects wide narrow faint bright

First statistical results SXDF deep photometry Optical variability X-ray data from Newton MIR data from Spitzer By Morokuma et al. (2007) → poster

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Variable objects found in multi-epoch imaging of Suprime-Cam

Morokuma et al. 2006

Variable component only

→ First statistical results of optical faint variables Basic Data for future surveys poster

  • Low-luminosity AGN population not found with deep X-ray survey
  • Possible most distant RR-Lyrae in our Galaxy
  • SN rate studies
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Publications, plans

IAUC7649 Doi et al. 2001 (7SNe), IAUC7971 Yasuda et al. (6SNe), IAUC8119 Doi et al. 2003 (13SNe) AAS Yasuda et al. 2004

Lidman et al. 2005 (VLT spectroscopy) Yasuda et al. 2007 (Suprime-Cam) Suzuki,N.? et al. 2007 (HST) Morokuma et al. 2007a,b,.. (variability, AGN, ..) Oda et al. 2007? (SN rate) (Also contributed SXDS)

After final HST photometry

Future further usage SN cosmology

  • nly using SDSS band data

Suprime-Cam, SNLS, SDSS

Subaru

Zero point photometry with USNO 1m

AAS 2007 Becker et al.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

High-z Cluster surveys by SCP (2005-2006) HST imaging (S.Perlmutter et al) 219 orbits Subaru spectroscopy (M.Doi et al.) 14 nights VLT spectroscopy (C.Lidman et al.) 16 hours+DDT Keck spectroscopy (S.Perlmutter et al.) 6 nights+ with cluster search/study teams RCS (Gladders, Yee et al.) RDCS (Rosati et al.) IRAC (Eisenhardt et al.) XMM (Mullis et al.)

RDCS 1252.9 @ z=1.23 (ISAAC and ACS)

  • III. SNIa on elliptical host galaxies
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Sullivan et al. 2003 Host galaxy morphology of SNe with HST blue:late type red:E/S0 E/S0 σ=0.16 mag ⇔ All sample σ~0.5 mag

Host extinction

slide-25
SLIDE 25

SNe found

Redshift successfully determined so far total 23 SNe Subaru 19 SNe

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Preliminary SN Light curves

J z

i

Maggie z=1.31

J z

Tomo z=1.41 Midge z=0.98 Shaya z=1.35 J z

i

z

i

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Example spectra with FOCAS

z=0.851 z=1.3 Spectroscopy of SN with good Light Curves total 18 Sne Subaru 12 SNe

slide-28
SLIDE 28

LGAO for distant SNe

Submitted,2006/09

Spectroscopy with Subaru/FOCAS Found with HST/ACS

KeckII+NIRC2+LGAO

slide-29
SLIDE 29

H=23.9±0.14mag Exposure time 3600sec PSF(FWHM) 0.053 arcsec

Keck+LGAO+NIRC2

Pretty good accuracy

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Young power

Tomoki Morokuma (UTokyo, D3) SN faint spectroscopy, variability Naohiro Takanashi (UTokyo, D2) fitting SN light curve Takeshi Oda (KyotoU, D2) comparing SN rate with models Kohichi Tokita (UTokyo, D1) fitting SN spectra Yutaka Ihara (UTokyo, M2) studying SN progenitor Kohki Konishi (UTokyo, M2) studying SNIa spectral evolution …. (with SDSS SN follow-up programs etc.) See Posters

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Least χ2fitting of Spectra (by K.Tokita)

6000 7000 8000 9000

Flux

Ia t=Max z=1.156

SuF02-007

6000 7000 8000 9000

Flux

SuF02-065

Ia t=-1day z=1.166

Flux

6000 7000 8000 9000

S02-002

Ia t=7day z=1.032

S02-002

Flux

6000 7000 8000 9000

Ic t=-3day z=1.084

X axis : observed wavelength (A) Y axis : Flux (erg/sec/cm2/A)