MV2011L2-0004 Snap Lake Working Group De Beers update: North Pile, Paste and TDS
Airstrip Emulsion Plant North Pile Disposal Facility Water Management Ammonium Nitrate Pond Storage Facility Former Construction Camp Fuel Storage Facilities Warehouses and Workshops Intake Vent Raise Laydown Area Organics Pile Camp Area Processing Facility Mine Offices/Maintenance shops Treated Water Discharge Water Treatment Plant
Summary of Paste Research
Background Original Mine Design proposed the production of paste tailings • • Driver was to minimize environmental footprint It was envisaged that paste tailings would be used as follows: • • Placed underground as part of mine backfilling • Placed at the tailings facility as part of an upstream construction approach. 50% Underground planned backfill • Remainder placed in the North Pile (Processed Kimberlite containment facility) •
Paste History Original paste plant not fully commissioned. • Commissioning and paste project commenced 2010. • Snap Lake Mine uses deep cone thickening. • Significant early operational challenges were encountered. • Only one other Diamond mine (of which we are aware) has successfully produced • Paste • Kimberley Mines (South Africa) does not experience the harsh arctic environment which presents its own challenges 5
Background and Initial Design of Snap Lake Paste System 6
Background 2001-2006 2001 AMEC engaged Mine Systems to undertake initial paste test work • • Large kimberlite particle size tended to break down during flow loop testing 2001-2005 Golder prepared the detailed design of the North Pile • • Snap Lake Mine carried out a review of the test work • Golder contracted to review the paste backfill, and disposal system 7
Background 2007-2010 Paste pipelines partially commissioned during initial project phase • • Pumping system was not fully constructed or commissioned • Tailings deposition completed by pumping fine PK and trucking coarse and grits North Pile Starter Cell embankments constructed of coarse and grit PK • Planned that upstream embankments would be constructed at the remaining • cells using full mix pk (paste) Paterson Cooke commissioned to audit the system • • Noted performance issues with deep cone thickening to produce sufficient density to carry larger particle sizes without segregating 8
East Cell Perimeter Embankments 9
Background 2010-2011 10
Background 2010-2011 Pipeline replaced with smaller diameter piping (200 mm to 150 mm) to increase • velocities Segregation of material occurring within the pipeline • 11
Results and Conclusions Originally assumed that kimberlite would be disposed of via spigots at 2º inclined • beach Assumed that tailings would be of sufficient strength to allow for berm raises. • Despite thickened nature of full paste mix with solids between 70—76% product • did not achieve required strengths • Product has lows yields and does not stack due to lower than anticipated yield stresses and rheology of the product Resulted in a change in pile construction to placement of coarse and grit • processed kimberlite 12
Advanced Stage Redesign 2012 addition of 1,500 m of piping to facilitate underground trials • Engineer on site for three months to assist plant operators with performance • enhancements on trials Procedures were developed for operating the paste plant • End of 2012 approval given for dedicated underground paste team • • Dedicated to constructing barricades and pipelines, monitoring pours etc. 13
Centrifuge Trial To improve paste densities, centifuge technology was trialed • Intended to dewater material used in paste and improve control of solids • concentration in final product. • Final product removed some untrafines , but showed good flow characteristics and produced a cake with a density of 1.8 t/m³ • Subsequent testing completed demonstrated that rheology had changed since initial testing commenced • Variations in the kimberlite dyke and safety concerns required certified engineered barricades be designed 14
2013 Updated Hydraulic Analysis and Mechanical Design- Underground First paste pour occurred in February 2013 • • Ended early due to pressure causing concern over damaging the system • Trials continued throughout the year Various percentages of cement were added to improve yield stresses (up to 2%) • Progress improved with the addition of a dedicated crew • Pressure testing later determined that the mechanical supports for the pipeline • needed to be redesigned 15
Technical Challenges Production of stable paste suitable for underground operation and tailings facility • is not possible for all ore types: • Rheology of the ore not consistent producing low strength paste • Variability of ore type, hence gradation, physical properties, and fluid characteristics. • The tendency for kimberlite particles to break down in a pipe and flowing stream. 16
Layout of the Orebody and Underground Mine Workings Geometry of the orebody and layout of development make it a challenge to • achieve 50% backfill • Shallow dipping dyke at 10-15º • Modified room and pillar mining system • Positive gradient of ore stopes • Density Difference between intact rock and paste backfill Based on this, it is projected that less than 30% of processed kimberlite will be • deposited underground 17
Future of Paste Backfill Alternatives are currently being assessed • Although only a small volume of backfill has successfully been placed, future work • will build upon successes to date 2014 work will include: • • Underground booster pump station design and • Expanding under ground reticulation system • Second centrifuge 18
Conclusion De Beers Snap Lake Mine has demonstrated that paste backfill can be placed in the • underground mine workings Paste tailings have been deposited in to the “North Pile” although the beach angles and • paste strength are lower than required to successfully be used for upstream embankment construction The Snap Lake Mine operator bench strength has increased • Stope layouts and overall underground mine geometry and mining methods will make • attaining the required underground placement rates highly unlikely Continued testing and research in the future will be done on the rheology of the kimberlite • in order to ensure the safe and efficient underground deposition 19
Questions?
North Pile Update
North Pile Footprint 22
North Pile Current Status Deposition of PK slurry into the Starter cell commenced in the second half of 2007. • Design and construction of the East Cell commenced in 2010 • First deposition into the East Cell was in 2012. • The Starter cell has undergone three phased raises in the height since the original design. • Cone penetration tests (CPT) were undertaken in the Starter Cell in the fourth quarter of • 2013. Results indicate that further upstream increase in embankment height of the Starter cell is at present not geotechnically feasible. DBCI expects production rates to increase above name plate rates over life of mine. • 23
Estimated Dates for capacity to be met: Starter and East Cells 24
Present Situation and Future Requirements Currently in West Cell Design Phase • The following conservative design assumptions and facts have been included for • the design of the North Pile extension: Waste host rock, and PK will be deposited on surface. Currently, it is estimated that • less than 30 % PK in the form of paste will be deposited underground for the remainder of the life of mine. Paste technology and paste strengths will not meet the requirements of the original • envisaged North Pile design requirements. Upstream heightening of the Starter cell embankments will not be geotechnically • feasible. Although downstream options are feasible 25
West Cell Options To ensure that production operations are not disrupted the North Pile extension • needs to be constructed by the end of 2015. Several options are currently being considered to increase the North Pile capacity • for life of mine. • Raising the height of the current Starter and East Cells by changing angle of embankment slopes from 3:1 slope to 2:1 to facilitate a downstream embankment or • Expanding the current North Pile footprint; or • A combination of both. 26
High Level Timelines for West Cell Construction Geotechnical drilling and trenching Completed 2013 • Detailed design and layouts Ongoing • Submission of design package to MVLWB for approval Aug 2014 • Commence quarrying and excavation of water catchment structures Q4 2014 • Construction of West Cell structure 2015 • Deposition into West cell Q1 2016 • Conceptual studies into North Pile expansion Ongoing • Expansion designs and communication to regulators 2016/ 2017 • 27
Permitted Footprint 28
Draft Layout West Cell – Phase I 29
Conceptual Layout West Cell – Phase II W3 W1 W4 W2 30
West Cell Footprint Options 31
Starter Cell Conceptual Expansions 32
East Cell Conceptual Expansions 33
Closure Conceptual 34
Questions?
Chloride Discussion
Recommend
More recommend
