rps facilities needs report recap for the period of
play

RPS Facilities Needs Report - Recap For the Period of FY2016 FY2025 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RPS Facilities Needs Report - Recap For the Period of FY2016 FY2025 Presented to a Joint Meeting RPS School Board and City Council May 26, 2015 What is the capacity of the Districts existing facilities? Types of Capacity Grade RPS


  1. RPS Facilities Needs Report - Recap For the Period of FY2016 – FY2025 Presented to a Joint Meeting RPS School Board and City Council May 26, 2015

  2. What is the capacity of the District’s existing facilities?

  3. Types of Capacity Grade RPS Functional RPS Maximum PK 15:1 18:1 K 18:1 24:1 1 – 12 22:1 25:1 EE 9:1 9:1

  4. Capacity Utilized by Administration • Ideal Capacity is: – 85% to 90% of RPS Functional Capacity • Provides greatest flexibility to meet: – Educational needs of the students today and in the future – Forecasted enrollment

  5. Capacity Example Grade Current Computed # Enrollment Of Classes K 43 3 1 40 2 2 54 3 3 46 3 4 58 3 5 37 2 RPS Functional 278 16 RPS Maximum 14 Total Basis 12

  6. Available Seats Functional Capacity Grade 2014-2015 2019-2020 2024-2025 Elementary 1,212 748 1,037 (Utilized) 90.98% 94.43% 92.28% Middle 1,173 790 498 (Utilized) 78.59% 85.58% 90.91% High 1,430 1,586 952 (Utilized) 77.62% 75.18% 85.10% Specialty 1,375 1,351 1,311 (Utilized) 42.03% 43.04% 44.73% Total 5,190 4,475 3,798 81.25% 83.83% 86.28%

  7. Since 2005 the School Board has: • Has closed 17 schools, eliminated 1.0 million square feet and 6,681 seats • Opened four new schools with 575,000 square feet and 3,700 seats • Net reduction 425,000 square feet and 2,981 seats

  8. What if all Schools facilities were made equal? • 4 schools built in 1998 • 4 schools built in the past couple of years • 82% of the District’s schools are more than 20 years old • Approximately one third are at least 70 years old • Another one third are at least 50 years old

  9. Recap of Schools Equalization School Complete Major Moderate Minor Additions No Work Renovation Renovation Renovation Renovation Necessary /Replace Elementary 7 5 4 4 12 5 Middle 3 2 0 1 2 2 High 0 3 1 0 0 1 Specialty 2 1 1 2 0 0

  10. Equalization? • Long-term good, but cannot be done quickly • Not a viable option – Cost is very large – Would need to have a major rezone to meet projected growth, and – Would need to incur additional costs for additions, which will create additional empty seats – Creates no operational efficiencies since no schools are combined

  11. Total All Schools Actual vs. Capacity Total Capacity: 27,673 30,000 25,000 23,820 23,765 23,669 23,875 23,481 23,198 23,140 23,078 22,862 22,715 22,483 20,000 Student Count 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Capacity (Functional) Enrollment

  12. All Elementary Schools Actual vs. Capacity 16,000 Total Capacity: 13,430 14,000 12,744 12,706 12,716 12,682 12,711 12,627 12,577 12,000 12,498 12,425 12,393 12,218 10,000 Student Count 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Capacity Enrollment

  13. South Elementary Schools Actual vs. Capacity 8,000 Total Capacity: 6,450 6,786 6,772 6,768 6,767 6,754 6,723 7,000 6,650 6,645 6,589 6,501 6,301 6,000 5,000 Student Count 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Capacity Enrollment

  14. North Elementary Schools Actual vs. Capacity 8,000 Total Capacity: 6,980 7,000 5,952 5,944 5,958 5,944 5,932 5,917 5,924 5,914 5,904 5,848 5,804 6,000 5,000 Student Count 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Capacity Enrollment

  15. All Middle Schools Actual vs. Capacity Total Capacity: 5,480 6,000 4,982 4,957 4,899 4,859 4,810 5,000 4,690 4,544 4,414 4,358 4,307 4,280 4,000 Student Count 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Capacity Enrollment

  16. South Middle Schools Actual vs. Capacity Total Capacity: 2,612 3,000 2,798 2,794 2,777 2,764 2,744 2,652 2,516 2,500 2,378 2,338 2,324 2,290 2,000 Student Count 1,500 1,000 500 0 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Capacity Enrollment

  17. North Middle Schools Actual vs. Capacity 3,500 Total Capacity: 2,868 3,000 2,500 2,184 2,163 2,122 2,095 2,066 2,034 2,036 2,038 2,028 1,990 1,969 2,000 Student Count 1,500 1,000 500 0 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Capacity Enrollment

  18. All High Schools Actual vs. Capacity 7,000 Total Capacity: 6,391 6,000 5,439 5,317 5,203 5,071 4,985 4,961 4,930 4,905 4,900 4,854 4,805 5,000 4,000 Student Count 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Capacity Enrollment

  19. South High Schools Actual vs. Capacity 3,500 Total Capacity: 2,860 3,000 2,818 2,757 2,665 2,500 2,562 2,490 2,456 2,449 2,443 2,423 2,394 2,328 2,000 Student Count 1,500 1,000 500 0 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Capacity Enrollment

  20. North High Schools Actual vs. Capacity 4,000 Total Capacity: 3,531 3,500 3,000 2,633 2,621 2,562 2,560 2,538 2,509 2,451 2,440 2,449 2,411 2,411 2,500 Student Count 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Capacity Enrollment

  21. Options

  22. Options

  23. Option 1 • No new schools, major renovations, or rezoning • Old buildings and systems remain • High annual CIP • Higher operating cost • Portables will be needed to address increasing student population • Not a viable option

  24. Option 2 • Rezone to address projected student enrollment • Significantly impacts the concept of schools as centers of the community • Significant increase in operating costs • Negatively impacts quality of education • Continue to have old buildings and systems • Continue to have higher operating costs • Continue to have higher annual CIP amounts • Portables will be needed to address increasing student population • Not a viable option

  25. Option 3 • Equalize schools • Not a viable option • Continue high operating cost • Does not address capacity issues from projected enrollment growth • Does not create any efficiencies • Very expensive

  26. Option 4: Use of lower cost tools • Establish Pre-K centers for all Pre-K programs • Rezone elementary schools in over/under-crowded regions to balance utilization where it does not impact the community school concept. • Consolidate 4 elementary schools into 2 existing locations • Consolidate 1 elementary school into an existing elementary school with an addition • Consolidate 2 middle schools into 1 existing location • Consolidate 1 high school • Consolidate 4 secondary schools into 2 existing locations • Move to full-time CTE program center • All of these options can be implemented very quickly • Does not address capacity issues from projected enrollment growth • Not the recommended option

  27. Option 5 (Elementary): Use of lower & higher cost tools • Evaluate the establishment of Pre-K centers for all Pre-K programs • Rezone elementary schools in over/under-crowded regions to balance utilization where it does not impact the community school concept. • Consolidate 2 elementary schools • Consolidate 1 elementary school into an existing elementary school with an addition • Combine 4 elementary schools into 2 NEW elementary schools • Combine 3 elementary schools into 1 NEW elementary school and 1 renovated/addition elementary school • 1 New elementary school, resulting in one school closed • Rezone so there is an equitable split in the south • Renovations to remaining existing buildings

  28. Option 5(Secondary): Use of lower & higher cost tools • Consolidate 4 middle schools into 2 NEW Middle Schools • Consolidate 1 high school • Construct new high school to meet projections • Consolidate 4 secondary schools into 2 existing locations • Renovations to remaining existing buildings

  29. Option 5 Projected Implementation Costs 80,000,000 70,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030

  30. Recap of Option #5 Phase II Phase III Total Phase I # # # # Elementary (4) (5) 0 (9) 2 2 1 5 1 1 0 2 (2) 1 1 (4) Middle (2) 0 (1) (3) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 (1) 0 (1) (2) High 0 (1) (1) (2) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) (1) Total (6) (6) (2) (14) 3 3 1 7 1 1 0 2 (3) (3) (1) (7)

Recommend


More recommend