review of alice experiments
play

Review of ALICE Experiments (Jin-Hee Yoon) Dept. of Physics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Review of ALICE Experiments (Jin-Hee Yoon) Dept. of Physics 2017. 6. 17 @ 2 Outline Introductjon Review of Alice Results ITS upgrade Conclusion Objects Searching for the


  1. Review of ALICE Experiments 尹 珍 姬 (Jin-Hee Yoon) Dept. of Physics 2017. 6. 17 @ 제 2 회 대칭성 탐사단 워크샾

  2. Outline  Introductjon  Review of Alice Results  ITS upgrade  Conclusion

  3. Objects  Searching for the initjal stage of Universe  From QCD calculatjon, ­ Confjning at normal temperature  At high momentum transfer  α S becomes weak  asymptotjc freedom  Quark-Gluon Plasma(QGP)

  4. Lattjce QCD Calculatjon  15 MeV GeV/fm 3 

  5. Phase Diagram RHIC, LHC Early universe quark-gluon plasma (QGP) T c hadron gas Temperature Colour super nuclei nucleon gas conductor neutron stars net baryon density ρ 0

  6. How to produce?  Theoretjcally  Experimentally Heavy Ion Collision

  7. Evolutjons

  8. QGP in the Universe

  9. Observables?  High energy process  Low energy process ­ ­ Energy loss by quarks, gluons Radiatjon of hadrons and photons and other partjcles (multjplicity, pT spectra, PDF..) ­ ­ Quarkonia and heavy fmavour Azimuthal asymmetry, expansion

  10. Variables  Center of Mass Energy   Rapidity  Pseudo Rapidity  At high energy,

  11. A Large Ion Collider Experiment Detector : 16X26 m 10000 tons Collaboratjons : 1500 members, 154 instjtute, 37 countries

  12. ALICE COLLABORATION

  13. Partjcipatjng Instjtutes Participants (39) - 6 Univs. + 1 Insti- tute - Prof : 10 - PhD : 5 - Graduates : 24 Korea-CERN Symposium

  14. Collisions

  15. 2015 Pb-Pb Event Display p P b @ 5 T e V

  16. Centrality “Central” “Peripheral” Small impact parameter Large impact parameter Large system volume Small system volume Large partjcle multjplicity Small partjcle multjplicity Map these measurements into IP using Models!

  17. Charged partjcle multjplicity

  18. Sofu Probes – Direct photons  Inclusive – Decay = Direct  Prompt ­ Hard scatuering ­ High pT ­ Informatjon on PDF, QCD…  Thermal ­ Thermal productjon ­ Low/medium pT ­ Informatjon on early thermal state(QGP?)

  19. Radial Flow Thermal + Collectjve expansion velocity MeV

  20. PT spectra of charged partjcles  Get fmatuen for more central  Stronger efgect for heavier partjcles  Heavier partjcles have larger momentum with same velocity

  21. Elliptjc Flow SCIENCE Vol: 298 2179 (2002) 7 Li Anisotropy in momentum Spatjal anisotropy space

  22. Elliptjc Flow   v 2 @LHC is 30% larger th an @RHIC.  Transfer of the anisotrop y from in space to in mo mentum space  viscosi ty info.  =0.2 (perfect fmuid)

  23. Strangeness Enhancement  In elementary pp collisions,  Strangeness products are suppressed relatjve to the productjon of light fmavors  For a large system, strangeness is enhanced.  How to confjrm?

  24. Nuclear Modifjcatjon Factor  : enhancement    : suppression

  25. Hard Probes – Jet Quenching

  26. QUARKONIA  : pair of c & antj-c  ­ Inside the QGP, quarks are color-screened  suppression ­ Debye length depends on Temp.  thermometer Less suppression than RHIC due to recombinatjon ALICE µµ Phenix µµ

  27. QUARKONIA  Suppression is independent of centrality.  Need to measure total charm productjon around pT~0 GeV.

  28. Small systems as reference? Nuclear initjal state Nuclear initjal state Hadronic initjal Cold matuer in the fjnal Hot matuer in the fjnal state & fjnal state  No phase transitjon in pp or pA collisions is expected.  But striking similarity across difgerent systems !

  29. Strangeness

  30. The p T spectra become harder as the multiplicity increases.

  31. • No baryon number dependency. • No mass dependency. • No MC models cannot reproduce this result.

  32. ITS Upgrade  Improve IP resolutjon by 3~5 tjmes ­ Closer to IP : 39 mm  23 mm ­ Reduce the material budget : 1.14%  0.3 % ­ Spatjal resolutjon : 12mmX100mm  5mmX5mm  Improve tracking effjciency and pT resolutjon at low pT

  33. Conclusion  Heavy-ion collisions during RUN1 and RUN2 periods.  ­ Energy density ~ 15 GeV/fm 3 >> ­ T=300 MeV ­ Elliptjc fmow from hydro-dynamics  QGP as a perfect fmuid ­ suppression smaller than at RHIC  dissociatjon + recombinatjon  Similaritjes among difgerent systems (pp,p-Pb, Pb-Pb) ­ Collectjvity in small systems? ­ Strangeness enhancement from low to high multjplicity pp collisions  Need high precision measurements of the productjon of heavy quarks, quarkonia, jet and di-leptons over a large momentum ra nge.  Looking forward to Upgrades

Recommend


More recommend