reimagining public safety
play

Reimagining Public Safety Operationalizing the Oakland City Councils - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

UPDATED ON 7/27 (Major changes from earlier version highlighted in yellow) 2020 Reimagining Public Safety Operationalizing the Oakland City Councils Commitment to Enhancing Public Safety Through More Appropriate, Efficient & Equitable


  1. UPDATED ON 7/27 (Major changes from earlier version highlighted in yellow) 2020 Reimagining Public Safety Operationalizing the Oakland City Council’s Commitment to Enhancing Public Safety Through More Appropriate, Efficient & Equitable Allocation of Resources Submitted for Council and Community Review/Feedback By 7/21/2020 Councilmembers Loren Taylor and Nikki Fortunato Bas

  2. • Background/ Context • Operationalizing The Taskforce • How You Can Get Involved • Next Steps Reimagining Public Safety 2

  3. Reimagining Public Safety 3

  4. The Problem: Our Public Safety System Doesn’t Work for All Oakland’s Equity Scores • INADEQUATE SERVICE LEVELS • Current Response Times and Service Levels are inadequate Related To Public Safety • Many residents feel less safe in the presence of OPD • INEQUITABLE OUTCOMES • Oakland scored 17.3 of 100 on equity scorecard for Public Safety • INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE FOR MANY SITUATIONS • Police and Community members agree that many of the calls police respond to are best answered by an alternative response team (e.g., homelessness, mental health, etc.) • INESCAPABLE PAST • After 17 years under the Negotiated Settlement Agreement, OPD still has 7of 51 tasks that are in complete • Police Commission is helping improve accountability, but must continue to be supported SOURCE: Oakland’s 2018 Equity Indicators Report • INEFFICIENT SPENDING (https://cao-94612.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/2018-Equity- • Significant investment is being made into less effective Punitive Indicators-Full-Report.pdf) Enforcement versus more effective Community Empowerment & Crime Prevention Reimagining Public Safety 4

  5. Oakland City Council Is Initiating A Taskforce To Reimagine Public Safety Taskforce Purpose & Goals The purpose of the reimagining public safety taskforce is to rapidly reimagine and reconstruct the public safety system in Oakland by developing a recommendation for Council consideration to increase community safety through alternative responses to calls for assistance, and investments in programs that address the root causes of violence and crime (such as health services, housing, jobs, etc), with a goal of a 50% reduction in the OPD General Purpose Fund (GFP) budget allocation. Reimagining Public Safety

  6. Other Complementary Efforts Outside of Taskforce’s Scope How do we stop negative, deadly, and inequitable outcomes that result from police interactions (e.g., use of force, abuse of power, loss of life, etc.)? 1. Addressing State policies and legislation to improve Police Officer Transparency & Accountability (including POBAR) - State Legislators 2. Enhancing Oversight & Accountability for Police Officer Misconduct - Oakland Police Commission 3. Establishing Alternative Response Models to Armed Law Enforcement – MACRO Working Group, Alameda County Health Department, and Other Community Based Organizations 4. Increasing investment into prevention and community empowerment – Department of Violence Prevention, Human Services Department, Oakland Parks, Rec, and Youth Development, OFCY Partners, and other Community Based Organizations 5. Improved selection and training of first responders – Oakland Police Department Leadership, Others Reimagining Public Safety 6

  7. Reimagining Public Safety 7

  8. Proposed Team/Advisory Group Structure Co-Facilitators Taskforce For Reimagining Public Safety Policy Link & National City Administrator’s Institute for Criminal Office Council Co-Chairs Justice Reform (NICJR) Nikki Fortunato Bas & Loren Taylor Budget Critical Public Safety Youth Commission Co-Chair Council District/Elected Nominees Board Nominees Members Nominee Partnerships Additions Police Mayor CPAB SSOC Comm. Through Process Large At 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1. Alameda County 2. Oakland Unified School A. Budget D. Advisory B. Alternate District Data & C. Legislative Community Boards Responses 3. Others - TBD Policing Analysis Reimagining Public Safety 8 NOTE: Board/ Commission nominees can be current members of the Board/Commission or another nominee they believe will be valuable contributor to the Taskforce

  9. Taskforce Membership Total KNOWLEDGE, EXPERIENCE, & EXPERTISE Who Nominates? Additional Criteria Positions NEEDED ON TASKFORCE 1 Each Councilmember (Incl. One representative from each 9 At-Large & Mayor) district • Active Members of Oakland Community Who Nominates 2 Each of three public safety Knowledge of Oakland’s Public 3 (Required of All) related citizen commissions Safety System • Committed to the Goals and Success of The • Community Policing Advisory Taskforce (Required of All) Board (CPAB) • Representation from Impacted Communities • Safety Services Oversight • Formerly incarcerated individuals Committee (SSOC) • Victims of violent crime and their family • Police Commission members 3 Budget Advisory Commission Knowledge and Familiarity with 1 • Immigrant community Oakland City Budget • From Community Impacted by police violence 4 Youth Advisory Commission Youth Voice (Ages 13-21) 2 • Historically underrepresented populations 5 Taskforce Co-Chairs (Bas & Knowledge/expertise/ experience 2 • Health/ Public Health Expertise Taylor) not already represented by other • City of Oakland labor/union representation nominees • Law Enforcement Operation/Budget Knowledge TOTAL MEMBERS 17 Reimagining Public Safety 9

  10. Taskforce Member Responsibilities Active Membership & Participation Required of Selected Taskforce Members • Thorough preparation for and active participation in all taskforce meetings (1-2 meetings per month) • Active participation in at least one Advisory Board (E ach Advisory Board to be co-chaired by a taskforce member) • Participate in and support various community engagement efforts • Other responsibilities – to be determined NOTE: Members are expected to be fully committed and prioritize participation on this taskforce. As such, there will be no alternate members, and no delegation of voting rights. Reimagining Public Safety 10

  11. Facilitator Selection Selection Criteria: Recommended • Facilitator that builds confidence in the process - Facilitator who has the experience Co-Facilitators and values to advance the goal of shifting policing resources from enforcement and punishment to prevention and wellness; who values transparency and accountability; and who is able to engender the trust and confidence of diverse stakeholders from those • National Institute who have been impacted by police violence to law enforcement. of Criminal Justice • Oakland Knowledge and History - with knowledge/ experience/ relationships here that Reform - David will be leveraged to ensure greater impact Muhammad (CEO) • Proven History of Deep Community Engagement/ Collaboration - Experience/expertise leading difficult conversations and engaging large, broad, and • PolicyLink – diverse stakeholder groups Michael McAfee (CEO), Anand • Open to Something Novel - someone who is not stuck in one way of thinking, but instead open to new possibilities to come out of the process. Analysis around why Subramanian punitive policing and incarceration is not always the answer and a belief that investing (Managing Director) in root causes rather than just police will achieve safety. Working knowledge of alternative models as well as a grounding in transformative justice. • Public Safety System Knowledge - knowledge of the history of policing in Oakland, but not a current sworn officer Reimagining Public Safety 11

  12. New Slide Advisory Board – Proposed Scope D. A. B. C. Budget Data & Alternate Community Legislative Analysis Responses Policing To research and To review, analyze, and To oversee and conduct To develop a perspective on develop perspectives/ develop a perspective data analysis where how we will design on alternate responses on relevant legislation needed to inform community engagement that impacts the extent to policing that should taskforce decision- and participation into the to which, and in what be considered in making process, and reimagined public safety Oakland with a view of ways proposals can be analysis of other system achieving adopted/ implemented Advisory Boards To leverage the knowledge transformational justice To include, but not be To include, but not be of the CPAB and include a limited to: State Law, To include, but not be limited to calls for review of the NSC/ NCPC limited to: Oakland Measure Z, service, overtime, system. Also, to include Homelessness, Mental The Negotiated budget and appropriate those areas that remain in- Health, Quality of Life Settlement Agreement, staffing levels scope for police and for Issues/disturbances, as the OPOA Contract those areas that are shifted well as civilianization. to alternate response models. Reimagining Public Safety 12

Recommend


More recommend